Common use of STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Clause in Contracts

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and Xxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Xxxxxxx’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is greater than $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and Xxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Xxxxxxx’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Local Affairs, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Grantee from receiving future grants and bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Consultant under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 appliessection shall apply. Grantee Consultant agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 101, 00-000-000, and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxConsultant’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §C.R.S 24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxConsultant’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxConsultant’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxConsultant’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeConsultant’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Consultant shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Consultant demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Principal Representative, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Consultant and prohibit Grantee Consultant from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Consultant may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeConsultant, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime any time thereafter, this §19 Statewide Contract Management System applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxContractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxContractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Transportation and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxContractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxContractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT CDOT, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-105- 102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400- 000-103- 601000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxContractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxContractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Colorado Department of Revenue, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-105- 102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxContractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxContractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the State Purchasing Office, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management SystemSystem (CMS). Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and Xxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Grant Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Xxxxxxx’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Public Safety, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Xxxxxxx agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management SystemSystem (CMS). Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and Xxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Xxxxxxx’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Colorado Department of Public Safety, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-00- 000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is greater than $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. XxxxxxxGrantee’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxGrantee’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and XxxxxxxGrantee’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxGrantee’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Grantee demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Local Affairs, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Grantee and prohibit Grantee from receiving future grants and bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Consultant under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 appliessection shall apply. Grantee Consultant agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 101, §00-000-000, and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxConsultant’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS C.R.S §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxConsultant’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxConsultant’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxConsultant’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeConsultant’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Consultant shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Consultant demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Principal Representative, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Consultant and prohibit Grantee Consultant from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Consultant may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeConsultant, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime any time thereafter, this §19 Statewide Contract Management System applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of concerningthe monitoringof vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant onstate contractsand inclusionof contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxContractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxContractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to tailoredto match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall informationshall be entered into enteredinto the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Transportation and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee the Local Agency under this Grant Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime any time thereafter, this §19 21 applies. Grantee The Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants agreements/contracts and inclusion of Grant agreement/contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxThe Local Agency’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantAgreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxxthe Local Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant Agreement administration process and Xxxxxxxthe Local Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Agreement Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Xxxxxxxthe Local Agency’s obligations under this Grant Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Granteethe Local Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Agreement term. Grantee The Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx the Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT CDOT, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar the Local Agency and prohibit Grantee the Local Agency from bidding on future GrantsAgreements. Grantee The Local Agency may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Granteethe Local Agency, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. A. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor by any one State Ordering Entity under this Grant Addendum is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee 15 applies to that State Ordering Entity’s Orders. i. Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §24-102- 205, §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor Contractor performance on state Grants Contracts and inclusion of Grant Contract performance information in a statewide Statewide Contract Management Systemmanagement system. ii. XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantAddendum, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-103.5- 101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. iii. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant Contract administration process and XxxxxxxContractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Statewide Contract Management System. iv. At the end of the current Contract term, the State Ordering Entity shall complete and submit a performance Evaluation in a form equivalent to Attachment 3 (Sample Contractor Performance Evaluation). B. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxContractor’s obligations under this Grant Addendum shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein by State Ordering Entities and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 thirty (30) days of the end of the Grant Addendum term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work Work progress. . C. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the State Purchasing & Contracts Office, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grants. Grantee Contracts. D. Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (ai) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation Evaluation (CRS §2400- 000-105-102(6000(6)), or (bii) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Local Agency under this Grant contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime any time thereafter, this §19 § 21. Statewide Contract Management System applies. Grantee Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor Local Agency performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management SystemStatewide contract management system. XxxxxxxLocal Agency’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation evaluation and Review review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grantcontract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rulesfiscal rules, Policies policies and Guidanceguidance. Evaluation and Review review of Xxxxxxxthe Local Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxLocal Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. Areas of Evaluation evaluation and Review review shall include, but shall not be limited to to, quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxLocal Agency’s obligations under this Grant contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeLocal Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System Statewide contract management system at intervals established herein and a final Evaluationevaluation, Review review and Rating rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant contract term. Grantee Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation evaluation and Reviewreview, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation evaluation and Review review determine that Xxxxxxx Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Transportation, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Local Agency and prohibit Grantee Local Agency from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Local Agency may contest the final Evaluationevaluation, Review review and Rating rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeLocal Agency, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee the Local Agency under this Grant Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 26 applies. Grantee The Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants agreements/contracts and inclusion of Grant agreement/contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxThe Local Agency’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantAgreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxxthe Local Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant Agreement administration process and Xxxxxxxthe Local Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Agreement Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Xxxxxxxthe Local Agency’s obligations under this Grant Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Granteethe Local Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Agreement term. Grantee The Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx the Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT CDOT, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar the Local Agency and prohibit Grantee the Local Agency from bidding on future GrantsAgreements. Grantee The Local Agency may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-105- 102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Granteethe Local Agency, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.. By CDOT Vendor #: for Xxxxxx X. Xxxx, Executive Director Date By CORPORATIONS: Attest (Seal) By Clerk and Recorder, City and County of Denver City Attorney for the CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER By By Manager of Public Works Assistant City Attorney REGISTERED AND COUNTERSIGNED: By: Manager of Finance CONTRACT CONTROL NUMBER: By: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Auditor

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Local Agency under this Grant contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime any time thereafter, this §19 Statewide Contract Management System applies. Grantee Local Agency agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor Local Agency performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxLocal Agency’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grantcontract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxLocal Agency’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxLocal Agency’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxLocal Agency’s obligations under this Grant contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeLocal Agency’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant contract term. Grantee Local Agency shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Local Agency demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Transportation, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Local Agency and prohibit Grantee Local Agency from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Local Agency may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeLocal Agency, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Borrower under this Grant Loan Agreement is greater than $100,000 or greater100,000, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Borrower agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants Loans and inclusion of Grant Loan Agreement performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. XxxxxxxBorrower’s performance shall may be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantLoan Agreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxBorrower’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant Loan Agreement administration process and XxxxxxxBorrower’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxBorrower’s obligations under this Grant Loan Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeBorrower’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Loan Agreement term. Grantee Borrower shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Borrower demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Colorado Energy Office, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Borrower and prohibit Grantee Borrower from receiving future grants and bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Borrower may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeBorrower, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and Xxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Xxxxxxx’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is greater than $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2424- 103-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management System. XxxxxxxGrantee’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxGrantee’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and XxxxxxxGrantee’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxGrantee’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Grantee demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Local Affairs, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Grantee and prohibit Grantee from receiving future grants and bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-105- 102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. A. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor by State Ordering Entities under this Grant Price Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 18 applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor Contractor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantPrice Agreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxContractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. . B. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxContractor’s obligations under this Grant Price Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein by State Ordering Entities and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Price Agreement term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work Work progress. . C. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee & Administration D. Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §2400- 000-105-102(6000(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause. E. At the end of the current contract term or sooner in the event the Price Agreement is terminiated prior to the full term, the Contractor shall complete and submit a performance evaluation in a form substantially equivalent to Exhibit D (Sample Contractor Performance Evaluation) attached hereto and incorparted herein.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime any time thereafter, this §19 Statewide Contract Management System applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §2400-103.5000-101000, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxContractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxContractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Transportation and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), by exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 201, 202, or 202204, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor by State Ordering Entities under this Grant Price Agreement is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantPrice Agreement, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxContractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxContractor’s obligations under this Grant Price Agreement shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein by State Ordering Entities and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Price Agreement term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the State Purchasing Office, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Grantee Contractor under this Grant Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 Statewide Contract Management System applies. Grantee Contractor agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants contracts and inclusion of Grant contract performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this GrantContract, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of XxxxxxxContractor’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant contract administration process and XxxxxxxContractor’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxContractor’s obligations under this Grant Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of GranteeContractor’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Contract term. Grantee Contractor shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the Department of Transportation and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx debar Contractor and prohibit Grantee Contractor from bidding on future Grantscontracts. Grantee Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of GranteeContractor, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. ‌‌ If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 18 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by comply with the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §2400-103- 601000-000, §24-24- 103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. The State is required to conduct Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant administration process and Xxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Xxxxxxx’s obligations under this Grant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT HC, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. ‌ If the maximum amount payable to Grantee under this Grant Subgrant is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this §19 applies. Grantee agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS §00-000-000, §00-000-000, §24-103- 601, §24-103.5-101 and §00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state Grants and inclusion of Grant Subgrant performance information in a statewide Contract Management Systemcontract management system. Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant, State law, including CRS §24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Xxxxxxx’s performance shall be part of the normal Grant Subgrant administration process and Xxxxxxx’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of XxxxxxxGrantee’s obligations under this Grant Subgrant shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Grantee’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Grant Subgrant term. Grantee shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Xxxxxxx demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and & Administration (Executive Director), upon request by CDOT the DNR, and showing of good cause, may xxxxx Xxxxxxx and prohibit Grantee from bidding on future Grants. Grantee may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Grantee, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.