Common use of STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Clause in Contracts

STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. If the maximum amount payable to Architect/Engineer under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at anytime thereafter, this section shall apply. Architect/Engineer agrees to be governed, and to abide, by the provisions of CRS 00-000-000, 00-000-000, 00-000-000, 24-103.5-101, 00-000-000, and 00-000-000 concerning the monitoring of vendor performance on state contracts and inclusion of contract performance information in a statewide contract management system. Architect/Engineer’s performance shall be subject to Evaluation and Review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, State law, including C.R.S 24-103.5-101, and State Fiscal Rules, Policies and Guidance. Evaluation and Review of Architect/Engineer’s performance shall be part of the normal contract administration process and Architect/Engineer’s performance will be systematically recorded in the statewide Contract Management System. Areas of Evaluation and Review shall include, but shall not be limited to quality, cost and timeliness. Collection of information relevant to the performance of Architect/Engineer’s obligations under this Contract shall be determined by the specific requirements of such obligations and shall include factors tailored to match the requirements of Architect/Engineer’s obligations. Such performance information shall be entered into the statewide Contract Management System at intervals established herein and a final Evaluation, Review and Rating shall be rendered within 30 days of the end of the Contract term. Architect/Engineer shall be notified following each performance Evaluation and Review, and shall address or correct any identified problem in a timely manner and maintain work progress. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Architect/Engineer demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the Principal Representative, and showing of good cause, may debar Architect/Engineer and prohibit Architect/Engineer from bidding on future contracts. Architect/Engineer may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS 24-105- 102(6)), or (b) under CRS 24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS 00-000-000, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Architect/Engineer, by the Executive Director, upon a showing of good cause.