Subject Matter Exclusions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 14.2, any Dispute not resolved internally by the Parties pursuant to Section 14.1 that involves the validity, infringement or enforceability of a Patent included in a license granted in this Agreement (a) that is issued in the United States shall be subject to actions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or submitted exclusively to the federal court located in the jurisdiction of the district where any of the defendants reside; and (b) that is issued in any other country (or region) shall be brought before an appropriate regulatory or administrative body or court in that country (or region), and the Parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction and venue of such courts and bodies.
Subject Matter Exclusions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 14.2, any Dispute not resolved internally by the Parties pursuant to Section 14.1 that involves the validity or infringement of a Patent Covering an Immunocore Product (a) that is issued in the United States shall be subject to actions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or submitted exclusively to the federal court located in the jurisdiction of the district where any of the defendants resides; and (b) that is issued in any other country shall be brought before an appropriate regulatory or administrative body or court in that country, and the Parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction and venue of such courts and bodies.
Subject Matter Exclusions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of Sections 13.1 and 13.2 shall not apply to any Dispute relating to: (i) the determination of validity of claims, infringement or claim interpretation relating to a Party’s patents, trademarks or copyright; or (ii) any antitrust, anti-monopoly or competition law or regulation, whether or not statutory.
Subject Matter Exclusions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of Sections 13.1 and 13.2 shall not apply to any Dispute relating to: [*****] Research Collaboration and License Agreement (Tau) 35 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED UNDER RULE 406 UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. [*****] INDICATES OMITTED MATERIAL THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. THE OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL FINAL EXECUTION VERSION [*****]. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing provision of this Section 13.3, any Dispute relating to Genentech and/or its Affiliate(s)’s assertion of non-infringement of or by any of its activities with respect to ACI IP Rights, including without limitation any assertion by Genentech or its Affiliates that the making, using, selling, offering for sale and importation of any Tau-Active Antibody(ies) and/or Licensed Product(s) do not infringe ACI IP Rights (“Patent Infringement Dispute”) shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 13.1 and 13.2, provided that at least [*****] of the [*****] arbitrators provided in Section 13.2 shall have had, by the time of the actual arbitration, at least [*****] years of experience as a practicing patent attorney registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office so as to better understand the patent-related issues addressed in the Patent Infringement Dispute.
Subject Matter Exclusions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 16.2, any dispute not resolved internally by the Parties pursuant to Section 16.1 that involves the validity or infringement of a Patent that claims an ADC (a) that is issued in the United States shall be subject to administrative proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or submitted exclusively to the United States District Court for the [**]; and (b) that is issued in any other country shall be brought before an appropriate regulatory or administrative body or court in that country, and the Parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction and venue of such courts and bodies.
Subject Matter Exclusions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Clause 18.2, any Dispute not resolved internally by the Parties pursuant to Clause 18.1 that involves the validity or infringement of a Patent Covering a Therapy or Candidate shall be brought before an appropriate regulatory or administrative body in the country in which such Patent is granted or applied for, and the Parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction and venue of such courts and bodies.
Subject Matter Exclusions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 14.2, any Dispute not resolved internally by the Parties pursuant to Section 14.1 that involves the validity, enforceability, or infringement of a Patent Covering a Licensed PROTAC or a Licensed Product (a) that is issued in the United States shall be subject to actions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or submitted exclusively to the federal court located in the jurisdiction of the district where any of the defendants resides; and (b) that is issued in any other country shall be brought before an appropriate regulatory or administrative body or court in that country, and the Parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction and venue of such courts and bodies. In addition, notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 14.1 or 14.2, deadlocked decisions of the JRC or JPT (except with respect to JRC approval of an Exclusive Target’s initial Optimization Plan) shall be finally resolved per Section 2.2.1(e) and 2.2.2(e), respectively. Deadlocked decisions of the JRC regarding approval of an Exclusive Target’s initial Optimization Plan is exclusively governed by Section 5.6.1.
Subject Matter Exclusions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of Sections 14.1 and 14.2 shall not apply to any Dispute relating to: (i) the validity, infringement, enforceability or claim interpretation relating to a Party’s patents, trademarks or copyright, which, for Patents that is issued in the United States, be subject to actions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or submitted exclusively to the federal court located in the jurisdiction of the district where any of the defendants reside; or (ii) any antitrust, anti- monopoly or competition law or regulation, whether or not statutory.
Subject Matter Exclusions. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Article 10, any dispute not resolved internally by the Parties pursuant to the required negotiation procedure in this Article 10 that involves the validity or infringement of a Patent that claims a Licensed Product(a) that is issued in the United States shall be subject to actions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or submitted exclusively to the federal court located in the jurisdiction of the district where any of the defendants resides; and (b) that is issued in any other country shall be brought before an appropriate regulatory or administrative body or court in that country, and the Parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction and venue of such courts and bodies.
Subject Matter Exclusions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Clause 21.2, any Dispute not resolved internally by the Parties pursuant to Clause 21.1 that involves the validity or infringement of a Patent Covering a Product (a) that is issued in the US shall be subject to actions before the US Patent and Trademark Office and/or submitted exclusively to the Federal Court of the Southern District of New York, New York, US; and (b) that is issued in any other country shall be brought before an appropriate regulatory or administrative body or court in that country, and the Parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction and venue of such courts and bodies.
