Common use of SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES Clause in Contracts

SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES. 4.3.1 Participant shall manage all certified product models (new and/or annual retests) through the website interface. The documentation uploaded through this process shall include completed test report, component‐specific installation instructions, dated photos of structural integrity testing, and photo of the entire model being submitted. By completing this process, Participant stipulates that the sample tested is representative of all units produced and offered for sale. Independent of the website interface, Participants must track retest dates for all certified product models. This information, along with test documentation, must be used if questioning the information on the website interface. Discrepancies must be submitted to the XXXXX Administrator, along with the appropriate documentation kept by the company, for investigation. For new equipment which may not specifically fit into the designated types listed within the specification ASTM F1487, it is suggested Participant notify Validator upon concept and initial product development. Participant shall provide preliminary design detail and documentation of proposed new equipment to Validator. Time to review new equipment design concept and hazard analysis will be invoiced as per Appendix C Fee Schedule, Engineering Documentation Review. Validator will review design concept, and provide support for identifying gaps within proposed risk assessment. Participant may refer to Appendix D for an outline of general expectations to be included within hazard analysis/risk evaluation. For submittal of new equipment that does not specifically fit into the designated types listed within the specification, Participant shall submit applicable test results, including supporting documentation of hazard analysis/risk evaluation, per section 1.6.1 of the Standard. Validator will review documentation for content and thoroughness. Time to review new equipment design concept and hazard analysis will be invoiced as per Appendix C Fee Schedule, Engineering Documentation Review. Participant shall maintain, record, control, retain and retrieve all documentation related to design, production, product testing, and marketplace. Documentation shall be made available to Validator upon further request and/or during annual inspection(s). In the event Participant and/or Validator encounter discrepancies or disagree with interpretation of applicable product testing or hazard analysis, Validator and/or Participant may elect to defer to the Equipment Certification Committee for interpretation and guidance. Procedures for requests of interpretation are noted in Section 9 of the procedural guide.

SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES. 4.3.1 Participant shall manage all certified product models (new and/or annual retests) through the website interface. The documentation uploaded through this process shall include completed test report, component‐specific installation instructions, dated photos of structural integrity testing, and photo of the entire model being submitted, and a copy of any private label agreements, if applicable. By completing this process, Participant stipulates that the sample tested is representative of all units produced and offered for sale. Independent of the website interface, Participants must track retest dates for all certified product models, including all private labeled models, if applicable. This information, along with test documentation, must be used if questioning the information on the website interface. Discrepancies must be submitted to the XXXXX Administrator, along with the appropriate documentation kept by the company, for investigation. For new equipment which may not specifically fit into the designated types listed within the specification ASTM F1487, it is suggested Participant notify Validator upon concept and initial product development. Participant shall provide preliminary design detail and documentation of proposed new equipment to Validator. Time to review new equipment design concept and hazard analysis will be invoiced as per Appendix C Fee Schedule, Engineering Documentation Review. Validator will review design concept, and provide support for identifying gaps within proposed risk assessment. Participant may refer to Appendix D for an outline of general expectations to be included within hazard analysis/risk evaluation. For submittal of new equipment that does not specifically fit into the designated types listed within the specification, Participant shall submit applicable test results, including supporting documentation of hazard analysis/risk evaluation, per section 1.6.1 of the Standard. Validator will review documentation for content and thoroughness. Time to review new equipment design concept and hazard analysis will be invoiced as per Appendix C Fee Schedule, Engineering Documentation Review. Participant shall maintain, record, control, retain and retrieve all documentation related to design, production, product testing, and marketplace. Documentation shall be made available to Validator upon further request and/or during annual inspection(s). In the event Participant and/or Validator encounter discrepancies or disagree with interpretation of applicable product testing or hazard analysis, Validator and/or Participant may elect to defer to the Equipment Certification Committee for interpretation and guidance. Procedures for requests of interpretation are noted in Section 9 of the procedural guide.

SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES. 4.3.1 Participant shall manage all certified product models (new and/or annual retests) through the website interface. The documentation uploaded through this process shall include completed test report, component‐specific installation instructionsalong with dated photos, dated photos or some other means of showing the date the photographs were taken, of structural integrity testing, and photo of the entire model being submitted. By completing this process, Participant stipulates that the sample tested is representative of all units produced and offered for sale. Independent of the website interface, Participants must track retest dates for all certified product models. This information, along with test documentation, must be used if questioning the information on the website interface. Discrepancies must be submitted to the XXXXX Administrator, along with the appropriate documentation kept by the company, for investigation. For new equipment which may not specifically fit into the designated types listed within the specification ASTM F1487F1487‐17, it is suggested Participant notify Validator upon concept and initial product development. Participant shall provide preliminary design detail and documentation of proposed new equipment to Validator. Time to review new equipment design concept and hazard analysis will be invoiced as per Appendix C Fee Schedule, Engineering Documentation Review. Validator will review design concept, and provide support for identifying gaps within proposed risk assessment. Participant may refer to Appendix D for an outline of general expectations to be included within hazard analysis/risk evaluation. For submittal of new equipment that does not specifically fit into the designated types listed within the specification, Participant shall submit applicable test results, including supporting documentation of hazard analysis/risk evaluation, per section 1.6.1 of the Standard. Validator will review documentation for content and thoroughness. Time to review new equipment design concept and hazard analysis will be invoiced as per Appendix C Fee Schedule, Engineering Documentation Review. Participant shall maintain, record, control, retain and retrieve all documentation related to design, production, product testing, and marketplace. Documentation shall be made available to Validator upon further request and/or during annual inspection(s). In the event Participant and/or Validator encounter discrepancies or disagree with interpretation of applicable product testing or hazard analysis, Validator and/or Participant may elect to defer to the Equipment Certification Committee for interpretation and guidance. Procedures for requests of interpretation are noted in Section 9 of the procedural guide.

SUBSEQUENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES. 4.3.1 Participant shall manage all certified product models (new and/or annual retests) through the website interface. The documentation uploaded through this process shall include completed test report, component‐specific installation instructionsalong with dated photos, dated photos or some other means of showing the date, of structural integrity testing, and photo of the entire model being submitted. By completing this process, Participant stipulates that the sample tested is representative of all units produced and offered for sale. Independent of the website interface, Participants must track retest dates for all certified product models. This information, along with test documentation, must be used if questioning the information on the website interface. Discrepancies must be submitted to the XXXXX Administrator, along with the appropriate documentation kept by the company, for investigation. For new equipment which may not specifically fit into the designated types listed within the specification ASTM F1487F1487‐17, it is suggested Participant notify Validator upon concept and initial product development. Participant shall provide preliminary design detail and documentation of proposed new equipment to Validator. Time to review new equipment design concept and hazard analysis will be invoiced as per Appendix C Fee Schedule, Engineering Documentation Review. Validator will review design concept, and provide support for identifying gaps within proposed risk assessment. Participant may refer to Appendix D for an outline of general expectations to be included within hazard analysis/risk evaluation. For submittal of new equipment that does not specifically fit into the designated types listed within the specification, Participant shall submit applicable test results, including supporting documentation of hazard analysis/risk evaluation, per section 1.6.1 of the Standard. Validator will review documentation for content and thoroughness. Time to review new equipment design concept and hazard analysis will be invoiced as per Appendix C Fee Schedule, Engineering Documentation Review. Participant shall maintain, record, control, retain and retrieve all documentation related to design, production, product testing, and marketplace. Documentation shall be made available to Validator upon further request and/or during annual inspection(s). In the event Participant and/or Validator encounter discrepancies or disagree with interpretation of applicable product testing or hazard analysis, Validator and/or Participant may elect to defer to the Equipment Certification Committee for interpretation and guidance. Procedures for requests of interpretation are noted in Section 9 of the procedural guide.