Termination for Patient Safety Sample Clauses

Termination for Patient Safety. If either Party determines in good faith, based on a review of the Clinical Data, Sample Testing Results or other Study-related Know-How or other information, that the Study may unreasonably affect patient safety, such Party shall promptly notify the other Party of such determination. The Party receiving such notice may propose modifications to the Study to address the safety issue identified by the other Party and, if the notifying Party agrees, shall act to implement immediately such modifications; provided, however, that if the notifying Party, in its sole discretion, believes that there is imminent danger to patients, such Party need not wait for the other Party to propose modifications and may instead terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice to such other Party. Furthermore, if the notifying Party, in its sole discretion, believes that any modifications proposed by the other Party will not resolve the patient safety issue, such Party may terminate this Agreement effective upon written notice to such other Party.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Termination for Patient Safety. In the event Sponsor believes that patient safety considerations may indicate that any Clinical Trial or part thereof should cease, Sponsor shall promptly consult with TKL regarding such belief and the reasons therefore, and TKL shall cooperate with Sponsor in making any changes necessary to address and cure such safety considerations. Sponsor may terminate the Clinical Trial immediately if Sponsor determines that patient safety considerations require such termination.
Termination for Patient Safety. If either Party determines in good faith that the MSD Compound Study or Collaborator Clinical Trial may unreasonably adversely affect patient safety, such Party shall promptly notify the other Party of such determination. The Party receiving such notice may propose modifications to the MSD Compound Study or Collaborator Clinical Trial to address the safety issue identified by the other Party and, if the notifying Party agrees, shall act to immediately implement such modifications; provided, however, that if the notifying Party, in its sole discretion, believes that there is imminent danger to patients, such Party need not wait for the proposed modifications and may instead terminate this Agreement immediately by notice to the other Party with immediate effect. Furthermore, the notifying Party may terminate this Agreement by notice to the other Party with immediate effect if, in its sole discretion, it believes that the modifications proposed by the other Party will not resolve the patient safety issue. [***] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is omitted because it is not material and would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.
Termination for Patient Safety. If either Party has a reasonable good faith belief, based on its review of the Clinical Data or other relevant information, that the Gilead Arm may unreasonably adversely affect patient safety, such Party shall promptly notify the other Party thereof. Upon receipt of such notice, the Parties shall meet promptly to discuss such matter in good faith and consider any potential modifications to the Gilead Arm to address such safety concern. If the Parties are not able to agree upon such modifications within [***] days after receipt of such notice, then either Party may terminate this Agreement effective immediately upon written notice to the other Party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if either Party, in its reasonable discretion, believes that the Gilead Arm presents a serious and imminent danger to patients, such Party may terminate this Agreement effective immediately upon written notice to the other Party describing such danger (without any obligation for the Parties discuss such matter for any period of time).
Termination for Patient Safety. If either Party determines in good faith, based on a review of the Clinical Data or other Study-related Know-How or other information, that the Study may unreasonably affect patient safety, such Party shall promptly notify the other Party of such determination. The Party receiving such notice may propose modifications to the Study to address the safety issue identified by the other Party and, if the notifying Party agrees, shall act to immediately implement such modifications; provided, however, that if the notifying Party, in its sole discretion, believes that there is imminent danger to patients, such Party need not wait for the other Party to propose modifications and may instead terminate this Agreement CONFIDENTIAL Pieris Study PRS‐343‐PCS_09_20 and Lilly’ I4T-NS-I025 Page 13 [***] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted because the information (I) is not material and (II) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.
Termination for Patient Safety. If COMPANY in good faith determines that (a) the COMPANY Compound is being used in the COMPANY Arm in a manner that is unsafe or contrary to this Agreement, the COMPANY Protocol or the Master Protocol, or (b) administration of the COMPANY Compound to subjects in the COMPANY Arm may unreasonably affect those subjects’ safety based on (i) a review of the safety information produced independently of the COMPANY Arm, (e.g., serious adverse events reported through the SDEA), or (ii) information provided by the data safety monitoring board, then COMPANY shall promptly notify GCAR. COMPANY and GCAR shall cooperate to develop modifications to the COMPANY Arm to address the safety issue(s) identified by COMPANY (which may include temporarily suspending administration of the COMPANY Compound). Upon agreement of both Parties, the Parties shall act to implement immediately such modifications; provided, however, that if either Party believes that any proposed modification(s) will not resolve the patient safety issue, either Party may immediately terminate this Agreement effective upon written notice to such other Party.

Related to Termination for Patient Safety

  • Contractor Certification for Contractor Employees Introduction Texas Education Code Chapter 22 requires entities that contract with school districts to provide services to obtain criminal history record information regarding covered employees. Contractors must certify to the district that they have complied. Covered employees with disqualifying criminal histories are prohibited from serving at a school district. Definitions: Covered employees: Employees of a contractor or subcontractor who have or will have continuing duties related to the service to be performed at the District and have or will have direct contact with students. The District will be the final arbiter of what constitutes direct contact with students. Disqualifying criminal history: Any conviction or other criminal history information designated by the District, or one of the following offenses, if at the time of the offense, the victim was under 18 or enrolled in a public school: (a) a felony offense under Title 5, Texas Penal Code; (b) an offense for which a defendant is required to register as a sex offender under Chapter 62, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure; or (c) an equivalent offense under federal law or the laws of another state. I certify that: NONE (Section A) of the employees of Contractor and any subcontractors are covered employees, as defined above. If this box is checked, I further certify that Contractor has taken precautions or imposed conditions to ensure that the employees of Contractor and any subcontractor will not become covered employees. Contractor will maintain these precautions or conditions throughout the time the contracted services are provided. OR SOME (Section B) or all of the employees of Contractor and any subcontractor are covered employees. If this box is checked, I further certify that: (1) Contractor has obtained all required criminal history record information regarding its covered employees. None of the covered employees has a disqualifying criminal history.

  • Termination for Force Majeure 15.5.1. The License Agreement may be terminated for Force Majeure Reasons as specified in Article -14.

  • Contractor Responsibility for System Agency’s Termination Costs If the System Agency terminates the Contract for cause, the Contractor shall be responsible to the System Agency for all costs incurred by the System Agency and the State of Texas to replace the Contractor. These costs include, but are not limited to, the costs of procuring a substitute vendor and the cost of any claim or litigation attributable to Contractor’s failure to perform any Work in accordance with the terms of the Contract.

  • Reporting Total Compensation of Recipient Executives 1. Applicability and what to report. You must report total compensation for each of your five most highly compensated executives for the preceding completed fiscal year, if— i. the total Federal funding authorized to date under this award is $25,000 or more; ii. in the preceding fiscal year, you received— (a) 80 percent or more of your annual gross revenues from Federal procurement contracts (and subcontracts) and Federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act, as defined at 2 CFR 170.320 (and subawards); and (b) $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal procurement contracts (and subcontracts) and Federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act, as defined at 2 CFR 170.320 (and subawards); and iii. The public does not have access to information about the compensation of the executives through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. (To determine if the public has access to the compensation information, see the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission total compensation filings at xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/answers/execomp.htm.) 2. Where and when to report. You must report executive total compensation described in paragraph A.1. of this award term: i. As part of your registration profile at xxxxx://xxx.xxx.gov. ii. By the end of the month following the month in which this award is made, and annually thereafter.

  • Termination for continuing Force Majeure Event Either Party may, by written notice to the other, terminate this Framework Agreement if a Force Majeure Event endures for a continuous period of more than one hundred and twenty (120) Working Days.

  • Pregnancy and Maternity Services This plan covers physician services and the services of a licensed midwife for prenatal, delivery, and postpartum care. The first office visit to diagnose a pregnancy is not included in prenatal services. This plan covers hospital services for mother and newborn child for at least forty-eight

  • Termination for Catastrophe In event of Catastrophic Damage, this contract may be modified un- der B8.32, following rate redetermination under B3.32, or terminated under this Subsection. Such termination shall not be considered a termination under B8.34.

  • Medical Records Retention Grantee shall retain medical records in accordance with 22 TAC §165.1(b) or other applicable statutes, rules and regulations governing medical information.

  • Contractor Selection In this section, please describe the selection process, including other sources considered and the rationale for selecting the contractor. Please answer all questions: a. What specific skill set does this contractor bring to the project? Please attach a copy of the contractor’s resume if an individual or link to contractor website if a company: Little to Great Scientists is an international leader in early childhood, elementary, middle and high school science education. xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/ b. How was the Contractor selected? Quotes, RFP/RFQ, Sealed Bid or Sole Source designation from the City of New Haven Purchasing Department? This contractor was selected because of their continued commitment to NHPS. They possess the knowledge base, resources, and motivation to support hands-on science education in New Haven. No other contractors were considered for this partnership. c. Is the contractor the lowest bidder? N/A If no, why? Why was this contractor selected? This contractor was selected because of their unique expertise in hands-on science learning and their continued commitment to New Haven Public Schools. They possess the knowledge and resources to support science learning at Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx School. d. Who were the members of the selection committee that scored bid applications? N/A e. If the contractor is Sole Source, please attach a copy of the Sole Source designation letter from the City of New Haven Purchasing Department. N/A

  • TERMINATION FOR CAUSE BY CONTRACTOR 4.06.1 Contractor may terminate its performance under this Agreement only if the City defaults and fails to cure the default after receiving written notice of it. Default by the City occurs if the City fails to perform one or more of its material duties under this Agreement. If a default occurs and Contractor wishes to terminate the Agreement, then Contractor must deliver a written notice to the Director describing the default and the proposed termination date. The date must be at least 30 days after the Director receives the notice. Contractor, at its sole option, may extend the proposed termination date to a later date. If the City cures the default before the proposed termination date, then the proposed termination is ineffective. If the City does not cure the default before the proposed termination date, then Contractor may terminate its performance under this Agreement on the termination date

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!