Tests of hypotheses Sample Clauses

Tests of hypotheses. Table 3 summarizes the path coefficients for the hypothesized model, and standardized coefficients are presented in Fig. 2. Both clauses of Hypotheses 1a and 1b were supported; procedural justice was positively related to intrapersonal need fulfillment (β = 0.16, p = .04) and interpersonal justice was positively related to interpersonal need fulfillment (β = 0.17, p = .005). Hypotheses 2a and 2b were also supported by the data, as the paths from job autonomy to intrapersonal need fulfillment and from coworker support to interpersonal need fulfillment were positive and statistically significant (β = 0.14, p = .04 and β = 0.37, p < .001, respectively). In addition, when estimating Model 2, the paths from procedural justice and job autonomy to interpersonal need fulfillment (β = 0.08, p = .34 and β = 0.09, p = .16, respectively) and from interpersonal justice and coworker support to intrapersonal need fulfillment (β = 0.10, p = .12 and β = 0.07, p = .32, respectively) were not significant; this lends support to our general thesis regarding the distinctiveness of intrapersonal and interpersonal need fulfillment and its respective differential pre- dictors. Hypothesis 3 was also supported, in that the path coefficients from POS to both intrapersonal and interpersonal need ful- fillment were positive and statistically significant (β = 0.46, p < 0.001 and β = 0.37, p < .001, respectively).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Tests of hypotheses. Table 5 models new venture survival and reports the results of the hypothesis testing. The initial model provides a baseline test of the core industry, firm, and team effects of interest (H1- H5). These core tests are thus repeated as the business model interactions associated with each of the sub-hypotheses are introduced in Models 2-11. Separate models for each interaction sub- hypotheses were run to address concerns with multicollinearity. Because the reported results are based on a Xxx hazards regression, the z-score coefficients are in the opposite direction of what would be reported in standard regressions; this is because negative coefficients correspond with a reduced hazard rate (or a positive effect on venture survival) and positive coefficients correspond with an increased hazard rate (or a negative effect on venture survival).

Related to Tests of hypotheses

  • Statement of Wages An Employer shall, on every pay day, provide to each employee a statement of wages of her pay period stating:

  • Accounts Not Required to Be Reviewed, Identified, or Reported Unless the Reporting Financial Institution elects otherwise, either with respect to all Preexisting Individual Accounts or, separately, with respect to any clearly identified group of such accounts, where the implementing rules in the jurisdiction provide for such an election, the following accounts are not required to be reviewed, identified, or reported as Reportable Accounts:

  • What Forms of Distribution Are Available from a Xxxxxxxxx Education Savings Account Distributions may be made as a lump sum of the entire account, or distributions of a portion of the account may be made as requested.

  • Disclosure Statement for Xxxxxxxxx Education Savings Accounts 1. Who is Eligible for a Xxxxxxxxx Education Savings Account? Anyone may contribute to a Xxxxxxxxx Education Savings Account regardless of his or her relationship to the beneficiary. The beneficiary of a Xxxxxxxxx Education Savings Account

  • Charge Nurse A charge nurse is an experienced nurse who is assigned the responsibility for the nursing activity and patient care on a single nursing unit for one (1) or more shifts. Nurses assigned charge responsibilities will have these additional responsibilities considered in their direct patient care assignments.

  • How Are Contributions to a Xxxxxxxxx Education Savings Account Reported for Federal Tax Purposes? Contributions to a Xxxxxxxxx Education Savings Account are reported on IRS Form 5498-ESA.

  • Entity Accounts Not Required to Be Reviewed, Identified or Reported Unless the Reporting Singaporean Financial Institution elects otherwise, either with respect to all New Entity Accounts or, separately, with respect to any clearly identified group of such accounts, where the implementing rules in Singapore provide for such election, a credit card account or a revolving credit facility treated as a New Entity Account is not required to be reviewed, identified, or reported, provided that the Reporting Singaporean Financial Institution maintaining such account implements policies and procedures to prevent an account balance owed to the Account Holder that exceeds $50,000.

  • E-Verification If applicable, Contractor represents and warrants that it will ensure its compliance with the Mississippi Employment Protection Act of 2008, and will register and participate in the status verification system for all newly hired employees. Mississippi Code Annotated §§ 71-11-1 et seq. The term “employee” as used herein means any person that is hired to perform work within the State of Mississippi. As used herein, “status verification system” means the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 that is operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, also known as the E-Verify Program, or any other successor electronic verification system replacing the E-Verify Program. Contractor agrees to maintain records of such compliance. Upon request of the State and after approval of the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security when required, Contractor agrees to provide a copy of each such verification. Contractor further represents and warrants that any person assigned to perform services hereafter meets the employment eligibility requirements of all immigration laws. The breach of this agreement may subject Contractor to the following:

  • Registry-­‐Level Fees (a) Registry Operator shall pay ICANN a registry-­‐level fee equal to (i) the registry fixed fee of US$6,250 per calendar quarter and (ii) the registry-­‐level transaction fee (collectively, the “Registry-­‐Level Fees”). The registry-­‐level transaction fee will be equal to the number of annual increments of an initial or renewal domain name registration (at one or more levels, and including renewals associated with transfers from one ICANN-­‐accredited registrar to another, each a “Transaction”), during the applicable calendar quarter multiplied by US$0.25; provided, however that the registry-­‐level transaction fee shall not apply until and unless more than 50,000 Transactions have occurred in the TLD during any calendar quarter or any consecutive four calendar quarter period in the aggregate (the “Transaction Threshold”) and shall apply to each Transaction that occurred during each quarter in which the Transaction Threshold has been met, but shall not apply to each quarter in which the Transaction Threshold has not been met. Registry Operator’s obligation to pay the quarterly registry-­‐level fixed fee will begin on the date on which the TLD is delegated in the DNS to Registry Operator. The first quarterly payment of the registry-­‐level fixed fee will be prorated based on the number of calendar days between the delegation date and the end of the calendar quarter in which the delegation date falls.

  • Verifications If Partner acquires Red Hat Products and/or Services directly from Red Hat, during the Term and for at least two (2) years thereafter, Partner will keep and maintain commercially reasonable written records regarding Partner’s use and distribution of the Red Hat Products and Services and business activities related to the Program(s) ("Records"). Red Hat may, at its own expense, verify the Records to determine Partner’s compliance with this Agreement. This verification may take the form of requests for information, documents or records (to which Partner will respond promptly), on-site visits (for which Partner shall grant Red Hat the requisite access), or both. The Parties will act reasonably and cooperate with each other in respect of such verifications. Any on-site visit will occur during regular business hours and will not interfere unreasonably with Partner’s business. For an on-site visit, Red Hat will give Partner at least thirty (30) day’s prior written notice.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.