The Formal Evaluation Clause Samples

The Formal Evaluation for a teacher on a full-time special assignment shall be conducted pursuant to Section 7 above.
View SourceView Similar (7)
The Formal Evaluation. 13.4.1 The final written evaluation shall be delivered and discussed at a conference, scheduled specifically for that purpose, between the Administrator and the employee. 13.4.2 It shall be held no later than sixty (60) days prior to the last instructional day scheduled on the school calendar. 13.4.3 The Administrator shall present the written evaluation and discuss its contents with the employee. The employee shall sign the written evaluation, signifying awareness and provision of the opportunity to attach a written response in accordance with Education Code section 44031. The employee shall receive a copy of the written evaluation and the original shall be placed in the personnel file. 13.4.4 The evaluation shall not be subject to the grievance procedure as to content, but grievance may be brought with respect to procedures followed during the evaluation process.
View SourceView Similar (2)
The Formal Evaluation. (Appendix C-3) 1. The final written evaluation shall be delivered and discussed at a conference, scheduled specifically for that purpose, between the Superintendent or Principal and the employee. 2. The conference shall be held no later than thirty (30) days prior to the last school day on the school calendar.
View Source
The Formal Evaluation. 13.4.1 The Formal Evaluation shall be prepared by the Administrator. 13.4.2 The Administrator shall present the unit member with his/her Formal Evaluation at a conference scheduled specifically for that purpose. 13.4.2.1 The conference shall be held no later than thirty (30) days prior to the last teacher work day. 13.4.2.2 The unit member shall sign the written evaluation to signify his/her receipt and notice of the opportunity to attach a written response in accordance with Education Code section 44031. The unit member shall receive a copy of the written evaluation. The original, with any written response that has been submitted within fifteen (15) calendar days, shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file. 13.4.3 If the District evaluates a unit member as "Needs Improvement - No Progress Evident," in any evaluation criteria the District shall attach the following to the Evaluation Form (Appendix D-2): 13.4.3.1 A list of duties performed in an unsatisfactory manner below District standards. 13.4.3.2 Suggested resources or techniques for the unit member’s consideration in remediating his/her performance. 13.4.3.3 A time period for demonstrating improvement. 13.4.3.4 Identification of criteria to be used in determining whether the unit member has, or has not, remediated his/her performance. 13.4.4 If, at the end of the time period for demonstrating improvement, the District concludes that the unit member's performance is unsatisfactory, another Formal Evaluation shall be prepared. A copy shall be presented to the employee, and the District shall take whatever additional action(s) it deems appropriate. 13.4.5 The evaluation is not subject to the grievance procedure as to content: a grievance may, however, be filed if the procedures set forth in this Agreement were not followed during the evaluation process.
View Source

Related to The Formal Evaluation

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.