Common use of Timing of Development Clause in Contracts

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, residential units that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later later-adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, structures or residential units that can be built each year on the Property Property, except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or 711 Colorado or to the Project and the 100% Affordable Senior Housing Project, and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, residential units that can be built each year on the Property or 711 Colorado except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer MINI of Santa Xxxxxx and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, residential units that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, Camarillo (1984) 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984)465, that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, residential units that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change Land Use Regulations that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, residential units that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ parties‟ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, residential units that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer Xxxxx and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, and residential units that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later later-adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ parties‟ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, structures or residential units that can be built each year on the Property Property, except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, residential units Residential Condominiums that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this Agreement.Agreement.‌

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the such parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet of buildings or the number of buildings, structures, residential units structures that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this AgreementProperty.

Timing of Development. The California Supreme Court held in Xxxxxx Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement. It is the intent of Developer School and the City to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that any Subsequent Code Change that purports to limit over time the rate or timing of development or to alter the sequencing of development phases (whether adopted or imposed by the City Council or through the initiative or referendum process) shall not apply to the Property or the Project and shall not prevail over this Agreement. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by the City on the amount of total square feet or the number of buildings, structures, residential units that can be built each year on the Property except as expressly provided in this Agreement.