Total loss occurring outside Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man Sample Clauses

Total loss occurring outside Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man. Channel Islands, Member Countries of the European Community, and any other country for which an international motor insurance Green Card in respect of the Insured Vehicle is effective at Date of Loss.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Total loss occurring outside Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man

  • XxxXxxxx Principles - Northern Ireland The provisions of San Francisco Administrative Code §12F are incorporated herein by this reference and made part of this Agreement. By signing this Agreement, Contractor confirms that Contractor has read and understood that the City urges companies doing business in Northern Ireland to resolve employment inequities and to abide by the XxxXxxxx Principles, and urges San Francisco companies to do business with corporations that abide by the XxxXxxxx Principles.

  • Xxxxx, Haldimand, Norfolk (a) An employee shall be granted five working days bereavement leave with pay upon the death of the employee’s spouse, child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, legal guardian, grandchild or step-grandchild.

  • Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-NoDerivs License The Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs License (CC-BY-NC-ND) permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, is not used for commercial purposes and no modifications or adaptations are made. (see below) Use by commercial "for-profit" organizations Use of Wiley Open Access articles for commercial, promotional, or marketing purposes requires further explicit permission from Wiley and will be subject to a fee. Further details can be found on Wiley Online Library xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx/WileyCDA/Section/id-410895.html Other Terms and Conditions:

  • Kesimpulan Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) merupakan bentuk kerjasama ekonomi bilateral antara Indonesia xxx Jepang yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kegiatan impor, ekspor xxx investasi di kedua negara. Kerangka perjanjian ini meliputi liberalisasi perdagangan, investasi, perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual, transparansi, anti-persaingan, memperdalam kerja xxxx, xxx menetapkan prosedur untuk menegakkan perjanjian. Perjanjian ini terjalin dilandasi oleh kepentingan nasional masing-masing negara. Adapun kepentingan nasional Indonesia dalam perjanjian ini xxxxxx xxxx mengoptimalkan kerjasama antara Indonesia-Jepang, mendapat kepastian akses pasar di Jepang yang lebih luas berkat penurunan tarif, meningkatkan arus barang xxx xxxx, mendapatkan transfer teknologi, sebagai sektor penggerak, program kesejahteraan, xxx juga menjadi pusat pengembangan manufaktur. General Review semestinya diadakan lima tahun setelah dilaksanakannya perjanjian. namun Jepang menunda pelaksanaan kegiatan ini sampai diubahnya Peraturan Menteri Keuangan yang diklaim tidak sesuai dengan IJEPA. Padahal sebelumnya Indonesia sudah menawarkan Jepang agar memberi usulan terkait peraturan ini sebelum diterbitkan. Indonesia masih mengejar kepentingannya untuk memenuhi perundingan ulang terkait tarif bea masuk xxx tarif impor yang belum terlaksana secara efektif. Selain berkenaan tentang kepentingan nasional, Indonesia sebenarnya juga tidak menetapkan tujuan yang jelas yang akan dicapai dalam kerjasama ekonomi ini. Diplomasi ekonomi yang diupayakan indonesia dalam kerjasama ekonomi bilateral ini didasari oleh beberapa faktor seperti latar belakang sejarah, hubungan perdagangan xxxx xxxxxx menguntungkan, xxx juga kemajuan perekonomian Jepang. Indonesia juga bergantung kepada situasi ekonomi Jepang karena kegiatan impor,ekspor, xxx investasi yang berlangsung memberi dampak terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia dilihat dari nilai perdagangan yang terus mengalami tren kenaikan. Meskipun menguntungkan,Indonesia harus terus bersikap tegas dalam melaksanakan perjanjian ini xxxxxx xxxxx banyak kepentingan nasional dari kerjasama bilateral ini yang belum sepenuhnya tercapai. Melalui analisis komprehensif terhadap kendala yang tidak kondusif bagi Indonesia dalam tinjauan umum IJEPA. Indonesia akan melanjutkan upayanya untuk mewujudkan kepentingan nasionalnya melalui kerja sama ini. Kerja sama ini diharapkan dapat terus meningkatkan hubungan baik perekonomian antara Indonesia-Jepang. DAFTAR PUSTAKA Anggraeni, N. A. (2020). DIPLOMASI EKONOMI JEPANG DALAM UPAYA PERPINDAHAN LIMBAH B3 MELALUI INDONESIA-JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA). Jurnal PIR: Power in International Relations, 3(2), 156-172. Ardiyanti, S. T. (2015). Dampak Perjanjian Perdagangan Indonesia - Jepang (Ijepa) Terhadap Kinerja Perdagangan Bilateral. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 9(2), 129–151. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.30908/bilp.v9i2. 5 Arifin Rivai, A. N. (2017). Posisi Indonesia di Tengah Fenomena Korporasi Global (Studi Kasus: Relasi Dagang Indonesia – Toyota Pasca Kesepakatan IJEPA). Indonesian Perspective, 2(2), 105. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.14710/ip.v2i2.18 474 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx. (2019). Faktor Penghambat Peningkatan Investasi Jepang di Indonesia dalam Kerangka Kerja IJEPA 208-2018. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan. Gocklas C.S, L., & Sulasmiyati, S. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) Terhadap Nilai Perdagangan Indonesia-Jepang (Studi Pada Badan Pusat Statistik 2000-2016). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB)|Vol, 50(5), 191–200. xxxxx://xxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/media/pub lications/188892-ID-analisis- pengaruh-indonesia-japan- econom.pdf Hadi, S. (2014). Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: an Indonesian Perspective. East Asian Policy, 06(03), 114–128. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1142/s17939305 14000312 Harahap, I. K., & Xxxxxx, A. M. (2015). DAMPAK PENERAPAN INDONESIA-JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT TERHADAP EKSPOR INDONESIA KE JEPANG. Media Ekonomi, 23(1), 27. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.25105/me.v23i1. 0000 Xxxxxx, X. S. (2016). KEGAGALAN INDONESIA DALAM IMPLEMENTASI INDONESIAN JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA). Jurnal Lyceum, 4(1), 430–439. Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Analisis Review Indonesia Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) dalam Perdagangan Barang. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1108/eb057810

  • Eindgebruikers binnen de Amerikaanse overheid De Apple software en de bijbehorende documentatie zijn “Commercial Items”, zoals omschreven in 48 C.F.R. §2.101, en bestaan uit “Commercial Computer Software” en “Commercial Computer Software Documentation”, zoals beschreven in 48 C.F.R. §12.212 of 48 C.F.R. §227.7202, afhankelijk xxx xxxxx paragraaf van toepassing is. Overeenkomstig 48 C.F.R. §12.212 of 48 C.F.R. §227.7202-1 tot en met 227.7202-4, afhankelijk xxx xxxxx paragraaf van toepassing is, xxxxxx de “Commercial Computer Software” en “Commercial Computer Software Documentation” aan eindgebruikers binnen de Amerikaanse overheid (a) alleen als “Commercial Items” in licentie gegeven en (b) alleen met de rechten die xxxxxx verleend aan alle andere eindgebruikers conform de voorwaarden die hierin xxxxxx genoemd. Ongepubliceerd: rechten voorbehouden krachtens de auteursrechtwetgeving van de Verenigde Staten.

  • Washtenaw Community College Eastern Michigan University Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx College of Engineering & Technology Student Services BE 214 xxx_xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx; 734.487.8659 734.973.3398

  • Foreign-Owned Companies in Connection with Critical Infrastructure If Texas Government Code, Section 2274.0102(a)(1) (relating to prohibition on contracts with certain foreign-owned companies in connection with critical infrastructure) is applicable to this Contract, pursuant to Government Code Section 2274.0102, Contractor certifies that neither it nor its parent company, nor any affiliate of Contractor or its parent company, is: (1) majority owned or controlled by citizens or governmental entities of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or any other country designated by the Governor under Government Code Section 2274.0103, or (2) headquartered in any of those countries.

  • CFR PART 200 Procurement of Recovered Materials A non-Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines. Does vendor certify that it is in compliance with the Solid Waste Disposal Act as described above? Yes

  • Disputes between a Contracting Party and an Investor of the other Contracting Party

  • Employee Called as a Witness The Employer will grant leave with pay:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.