Treatment of Performance Assurance in Connection with Interconnection Cost Estimates Sample Clauses

Treatment of Performance Assurance in Connection with Interconnection Cost Estimates. Upon Seller’s request, 75% of the Collateral Requirement associated with a Designated System will be refundable if, prior to the Energization of that Designated System, an Interconnection Customer (as defined in Section 466.30 of Title 83 of the Illinois Administrative Code) seeking to interconnect the Designated System receives from the interconnecting utility a non-binding estimate of costs to construct the interconnection facilities and any required distribution upgrades for that Designated System in an amount exceeding 30 cents per watt AC of the Designated System’s Proposed Nameplate Capacity. For avoidance of doubt, in the case that Seller submits such request within thirty (30) Business Days of the Trade Date of the Product Order and has not posted Performance Assurance, Seller shall pay Buyer an amount equal to 25% of the Collateral Requirement associated with such Designated System. To obtain such refund, Seller’s request must be made to Buyer and the IPA within thirty (30) days of having received the subject interconnection cost estimate (or if Seller is disputing such subject interconnection cost estimate, then Seller is (i) to inform Buyer and the IPA within thirty (30) days of having received the subject interconnection cost estimate that it is disputing such interconnection cost estimate and (ii) to make the refund request within fourteen (14) days of having received a final estimate as the result of an interconnection cost dispute) and must be accompanied by a) documentation substantiating the cost estimate and b) a written request substantially in the form of Schedule D to the Product Order to withdraw the Designated System from the Agreement (or, in the case of an Agreement featuring a single Designated System, a request to terminate the Agreement). Upon the recognition by Buyer of such request and substantiation of the interconnection cost estimate applicable to the Designated System, Buyer shall remove the Designated System from this Agreement and refund 75% of the Collateral Requirement associated with that Designated System. In all such cases, the remaining 25% of the Collateral Requirement associated with that Designated System would be permanently forfeited and could not be applied to a new ABP application for the Designated System. Upon removal of the Designated System, the IPA shall provide to Buyer and Seller a revised Schedule A, Schedule C and Schedule D to the Product Order for such Designated System indicating the removal of...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Treatment of Performance Assurance in Connection with Interconnection Cost Estimates

  • Assessment of Performance The assignment of a teacher to a TLS position will be subject to review by the school district’s administration at least annually. The first review must be completed no later than five (5) work days before the beginning of the transfer process. The review shall include peer feedback on the effectiveness of the teacher’s performance of duty specific to the teacher’s TLS position. A teacher who completes an assignment in a TLS position may apply for assignment to a new TLS position.

  • Cost Responsibility for Interconnection Facilities and Distribution Upgrades 4.1 Interconnection Facilities 4.2 Distribution Upgrades

  • Global Access Transport Charges (U S. Bridged): Per-minute per-bridge port usage charges, based on availability of service, zone and origination access type. Bridging charges are additional and are priced at Customer's applicable Toll Meet Meet-Me Access rate per minute. Freephone (IFN) Transport Zone A – G. Discounts:

  • Commencement of Performance This Agreement is of no force and effect until signed by both parties and all JBE-required approvals are secured. Any commencement of performance prior to Agreement approval shall be at Contractor's own risk.

  • Future Treatment of Unallowable Costs Unallowable Costs shall be separately determined and accounted for by Defendants, and Defendants shall not charge such Unallowable Costs directly or indirectly to any contracts with the United States or any State Medicaid program, or seek payment for such Unallowable Costs through any cost report, cost statement, information statement, or payment request submitted by Defendants or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates to the Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, or FEHBP Programs.

  • Continuity of Performance In the event of a dispute between the Party and the State, each party will continue to perform its obligations under this Agreement during the resolution of the dispute until this Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms.

  • Treatment of Unallowable Costs Previously Submitted for Payment Defendants further agree that within 90 days of the Effective Date of this Agreement they shall identify to applicable Medicare and TRICARE fiscal intermediaries, carriers, and/or contractors, and Medicaid and FEHBP fiscal agents, any Unallowable Costs (as defined in this Paragraph) included in payments previously sought from the United States, or any State Medicaid program, including, but not limited to, payments sought in any cost reports, cost statements, information reports, or payment requests already submitted by Defendants or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates, and shall request, and agree, that such cost reports, cost statements, information reports, or payment requests, even if already settled, be adjusted to account for the effect of the inclusion of the Unallowable Costs. Defendants agree that the United States, at a minimum, shall be entitled to recoup from Defendants any overpayment plus applicable interest and penalties as a result of the inclusion of such Unallowable Costs on previously-submitted cost reports, information reports, cost statements, or requests for payment. Any payments due after the adjustments have been made shall be paid to the United States pursuant to the direction of the Department of Justice and/or the affected agencies. The United States reserves its rights to disagree with any calculations submitted by Defendants or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates on the effect of inclusion of Unallowable Costs (as defined in this Paragraph) on Defendants or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates’ cost reports, cost statements, or information reports.

  • CENTRALIZED CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS A. OGS, an Authorized User, or the Contractor may suggest modifications to the Centralized Contract or its Appendices. Except as specifically provided herein, modifications to the terms and conditions set forth herein may only be made with mutual written agreement of the Parties. Modifications may take the form of an update or an amendment. “

  • Timeliness of Performance Contractor must provide the Services and Deliverables within the term and within the time limits required under this Contract, pursuant to Detailed Specifications or as specified in the applicable Task Order or Purchase Order. Further, Contractor acknowledges that TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE and that the failure of Contractor to comply with the time limits may result in economic or other losses to the City. Neither Contractor nor its agents, employees or Subcontractors are entitled to any damages from the City, nor is any party entitled to be reimbursed by the City, for damages, charges or other losses or expenses incurred by Contractor by reason of delays or hindrances in the performance of the Services, whether or not caused by the City.

  • Construction Cost Estimate At 50% completion of the contract documents, the design team will present and submit copies of the project plans and manual. The Construction Administrator will prepare and issue the fourth of five construction cost estimates. The estimate shall be derived from actual takeoffs, subcontractor and vendor input, and material and labor cost data. All quantitative systems information shall be provided in detail.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.