Uncertainty. If it is uncertain whether:
Uncertainty. In the event of uncertainty as to whether any information is Confidential Information, the information is deemed to be Confidential Information unless Health notifies the Confidant in Writing to the contrary.
Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the Offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission or mistake).
Uncertainty. If there is any uncertainty by any Party regarding whether any information or material is in the public domain, they will treat that information or material as confidential until the other Party advises that Party in writing that it is not confidential.
Uncertainty. If the Executive is uncertain whether:
Uncertainty. If there is any uncertainty as to whether any information is Confidential Information, that information must be treated as Confidential Information unless the Executive is advised by the Board in writing to the contrary.
Uncertainty. If the Recipient Party is uncertain as to whether any information is Confidential Information, the Recipient Party must treat the information as if it were Confidential Information and as not being in the public domain unless and until the Disclosing Party agrees in writing that the information is in the public domain.
Uncertainty. Unitholders who tender their Units will be giving up the opportunity to participate in any future potential benefits represented by ownership of Units, including, for example, the right to participate in any future distribution of cash or property, whether from operations, the
Uncertainty. When reporting outcomes, SACs will make explicit the level and type of uncertainty (both limitations on the quality of the available data and lack of knowledge) associated with their advice. Any assumptions made by the SAC will be clearly spelled out, and, in reviews, previous assumptions will be challenged. Data gaps will be identified and their impact on uncertainty assessed by the SAC. An indication will be given by the SAC about whether the evidence base is changing or static, and if appropriate, how developments in the evidence base might affect key assumptions and conclusions.
Uncertainty. [23] Xx. Xxxxxxxxx submitted that the original written agreement under which Xx. Xxxxxx worked full-time was a validly constituted contract. According to Xx. Xxxxxxxxx, that contract was brought to an end when Shoppers Pharmacy agreed to accept Xx. Xxxxxx’ new offer that he should be permitted to work part-time. Xx. Xxxxxx’ new offer amounted to a repudiation of the full-time contract. The terms of the contract around which the new offer was to be based were never settled and the new contract was therefore void for uncertainty and otherwise incomplete. [24] Xx. Xxxxxx is basically in agreement with Xx. Xxxxxxxxx’x position on the issue of uncertainty. He stated that the written agreement of 1st June 2001 was valid because it contained the minimum terms provided in section C5 of the Code. He then stated the following in relation to “the second agreement”: “ … this agreement is clearly lacking in fundamental and definite terms and is therefore unenforceable. The only term agreed was that the Respondent would be working part-time. However this is extremely imprecise in and of itself, as there is no agreement on what amount of hours the Respondent would be working, and whether this in turn would be suitable to the Appellant. Further and flowing from this there was no agreement as to the calculation of the Respondent’s remuneration.” [25] Xx. Xxxxxx pointed out that not only was the term part-time imprecise as far as it concerned the number of hours which Xx. Xxxxxx was expected to work, but more, there were no discussions as to his terms of employment, including vacation privileges, and there was no performance by either party on it. Xx. Xxxxxx stated that the new agreement was apparently embarked upon by Xx. Xxxxxx in a moment of frustration in response to a unilateral change in his work schedule; and it is silent on the remuneration that is to be paid for the part-time employment. Xx. Xxxxxx concluded that the part-time contract, which was unwritten, was therefore void for uncertainty. [26] I agree that the contract into which the parties entered on 1st June 2001 was not void for uncertainty notwithstanding that it did not specify Xx. Xxxxxx’ exact hours of work. It was a written contract signed by the parties. It stated that his work was full-time. Xxx. Xxxxxxx stated in her evidence that this meant that he was to work for 40 hours per week. The parties agreed from time to time on the actual monthly work schedule. They agreed on the other fundamental terms ...
