VIOLATIONS CHARGED. 17. The acquisition agreement between Fresenius and NMC described in paragraph 4 violates Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45.
18. The proposed acquisition of NMC by Fresenius would, if consummated, violate Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45. WHEREFORE, THE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Federal Trade Commission on this day of , 1996, issues its complaint against said respondents. By the Commission. Seal Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx Secretary Issued:
VIOLATIONS CHARGED. 16. The acquisition agreements described in Paragraph 8 constitute violations of Section 5 of the FTC Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 45.
17. The Acquisitions described in paragraph 8, if consummated, would constitute violations of Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 45.
VIOLATIONS CHARGED. 27. The Acquisition described in Paragraph 15 constitutes a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.
28. The Acquisition described in Paragraph 15, if consummated, would constitute a violation of Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45.
VIOLATIONS CHARGED. 24. The agreements described in paragraph 5 violate Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45.
25. The proposed acquisition of the class ring assets of Town & Country and CJC by Class Rings, Inc., and the acquisition of stock in Class Rings, Inc., by Town & Country, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45. WHEREFORE, THE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Federal Trade Commission on this day of , 1996, issues its complaint against said respondents. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx Secretary SEAL: The Federal Trade Commission (“the Commission”) has accepted for public comment an agreement containing a consent order with Class Rings, Inc., Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Partners II, L.P. (“Xxxxxx Xxxxxx”), and the Town & Country Corporation (“Town & Country”). This agreement has been placed on the public record for sixty days for reception of comments from interested persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. After sixty days, the Commission will again review the agreement and the comments received and will decide whether it should withdraw from the agreement or make final the agreement’s order. The Commission’s investigation of this matter concerns the proposed acquisition by Class Rings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, of certain assets of Town & Country and CJC Holdings, Incorporated (“CJC”). The Commission’s proposed complaint alleges that Town & Country and CJC are two of four major manufacturers of class rings in the United States. The agreement containing consent order would, if finally accepted by the Commission, settle charges that the acquisitions may substantially lessen competition in the manufacture and sale of class rings in the United States. The Commission has reason to believe that the acquisitions and agreements violate Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the acquisitions would have anticompetitive effects and would violate Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act if consummated, unless an effective remedy eliminates such anticompetitive effects. The Commission’s Complaint alleges that class rings are a uniquely American phenomenon and that class ring purchasers would not switch to other products even if prices for class rings increased significantly. The top four manufacturers of class rings -- Jostens, Inc., CJC, Tow...
VIOLATIONS CHARGED. 21. The agreement described in paragraph 4 violates Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45.
22. The acquisition of Softdesk’s IntelliCADD product by Autodesk, if consummated, would have violated Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45.
VIOLATIONS CHARGED. The agreements described in paragraph 3 ovliate Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 45.
VIOLATIONS CHARGED. The proposed acquisition by Jitney-Jungle, Xxxxxxxxx, and Delta of all of the outstanding stock of Delchamps violates Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and would, if consummated, violate Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45. WHEREFORE, THE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Federal Trade Commission on day of A.D., 19 , issues its complaint against said respondents. By the Commission. SEAL: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx Secretary
VIOLATIONS CHARGED. 19. The effects of the Acquisitions may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in violation of Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45.
20. Insilco, through the Acquisitions, has engaged in unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45.
21. Prior to the Acquisitions, Insilco requested and received from Lingemann Non-Aggregated, Customer-Specific Information about customers for which they both competed in the relevant product markets in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45. WHEREFORE, THE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Federal Trade Commission on this day of , 1997, issues its Complaint against said respondent.
VIOLATIONS CHARGED. 15. The Acquisition described in Paragraph 5 constitutes a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 45.
16. The Acquisition described in Paragraph 5, if consummated, would constitute a violation of Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 45. WHEREFORE, THE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Federal Trade Commission on this day of A.D., 199 , issues its Complaint against said respondent. By the Commission. Do xxxx X. Clark Se cretary SEAL:
VIOLATIONS CHARGED. 11. The proposed acquisition by Dow of all the shares of Sentrachem, described in paragraph 5, would violate Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18. WHEREFORE, THE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Federal Trade Commission on this day of , 1998, issues its complaint against said respondent. By the Commission. Seal Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx Issued:
