Xxxxxx and Demand Sample Clauses

Xxxxxx and Demand. If the Conservancy determines that the Owner is in violation of this Easement, or that a violation is threatened, the Conservancy shall provide written notice to the Owner. The written notice will identify the violation and request corrective action to cure the violation and, where the Protected Property has been injured, to restore the Protected Property. If at any time the Conservancy determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that the violation constitutes immediate and irreparable harm, no written notice is required and the Conservancy may then immediately pursue its remedies to prevent or limit harm to the Conservation Values of the Protected Property. If the Conservancy determines that this Easement is, or is expected to be, violated, and the Conservancy’s good-faith and reasonable efforts to notify the Owner are unsuccessful, the Conservancy may pursue its lawful remedies to mitigate or prevent harm to the Conservation Values without prior notice and without awaiting the Owner’s opportunity to cure. The Owner agrees to reimburse all reasonable costs associated with this effort to comply with the notice and demand activities in this Paragraph.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Xxxxxx and Demand. If the Township reasonably believes that the Owner is in violation of this Conservation Easement, or that a violation is threatened, the Township shall provide written notice to the Owner. The written notice will identify the violation and request corrective action to cure the violation and, where the Property has been injured, outline the corrective action necessary to restore the Property. However, if the Township determines, at its Sole Discretion, that the violation constitutes immediate and irreparable harm, no written notice is required prior to the Township pursuing its legal remedies to enforce this Conservation Easement or to prevent or limit harm to the Conservation Values of the Property. Furthermore, in the event the Township has sent written notification of the violation and during the 28-day cure period defined below, it becomes apparent to the Township that the continuation of the violation is likely to cause immediate and irreparable harm, the Township may pursue its legal remedies without waiting for the cure period to expire. Furthermore, if the Township determines that this Conservation Easement is, or is expected to be violated, and the Township’s good-faith and reasonable efforts to notify the Owner are unsuccessful, the Township may pursue its lawful remedies to mitigate or prevent harm to the Conservation Values without prior notice and without awaiting the Owner’s opportunity to cure. The Owner agrees to reimburse all reasonable costs associated with this effort.

Related to Xxxxxx and Demand

  • Xxxxxxxxx and X Xxxxxxx. A

  • Xxxxxxxx and X X. Xxxxx. 1930. Checklist of the fishes and fishlike vertebrates of North and Middle America north of the northern boundary of Venezuela and Columbia. Rept. U.S. Fish Comm. 1928(2):1-670. Jordan, D.S. and X.X. Xxxxxxxx. 1896. The fishes of North and Middle America. Part 1. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bul. 47:1-1240. Xxxxx, S. and X. Xxxxxx. 2005..Hydrogeologic setting of the snake valley hydrologic basin, Xxxxxxx County, Utah, and White Pine and Lincoln Counties, Nevada – implications for possible effects of proposed water xxxxx. Report of investigation 254, Utah Geological Survey. Xxxxxxx, M.C. 1982. Status report of three Bonneville basin endemic fishes. Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 27 pp. May, B. E. and X. X. Xxxxx. 1981. Comparative effects of sheep and cattle grazing on the Xxxxx Creek drainage. Transactions of the Bonneville Chapter American Fisheries Society. 1981:48-62. Xxxxx, X.X. 1985. Predation and species replacement in American Southwestern fishes: a case study. Southwestern Naturalist. 30:173-187. Xxxxxx, X. X. and X. X. Xxxxxx. 1985. Two New Intergeneric Cyprinid Hybrids from the Bonneville Basin, Utah. Copeia, 1985(2):509-515. Xxxxxx, X.X. 1972. Threatened freshwater fishes of the United States. Trans. Amer, Fish. Soc. 101(2):239-252.

  • Xxxxxxx and X Xxxx¨cker. A detailed account of Xxxxx Xxxxxx’ version of the standard model. IV. Rev. Math. Phys. 8 (1996) 205–228.

  • Xxxxxx and X Xxxxxxxxx. Key-agreement in ad-hoc networks. In Nordsec’99, 1999. [4] X. Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxx. Authenticated Group Key Agreement and Friends. In 5th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 17–26. ACM, November 1998. [5] X. Xxxxxx and X. Xxxxx. Communication complexity of group key distribution. In 5th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, November 1998. [6] X. Xxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx. Random oracles are practical: A paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In 1st ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1993. [7] Xxx Xxxxx. The Decision Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx problem. In Third Algorithmic Number Theory Symposium, number 1423 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 48–63. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, 1998. [8] Xxx Xxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx. Applications of multilinear forms to cryptography. To appear in Contemporary Mathematics, American Mathematical Society. [9] Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx. Provably authenticated group Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx key exchange — the dynamic case. In Xxxxx Xxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT ’2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Gold Coast, Australia, 2001. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany. [10] Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, and Xxxx-Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx. Provably authenticated group xxxxxx-xxxxxxx key exchange. In Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, editor, 8th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Philadelphia, PA, USA, November 2001. ACM Press. [11] Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx and Xxx Xxxxxxx. A secure and efficient conference key distribution system. In X. Xx Xxxxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’94, number 950 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, 1995. final version of proceedings. [12] X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxxx, X. Xxx, X. Xxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxxx. The VersaKey framework: Versatile group key management. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 17(9), September 1999. [13] Xxxxx Xxxxx. Zero-knowledge undeniable signatures. In X.X. Xxxxxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’90, number 473 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 458–464. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, May 1991.

  • Xxxxxxxx, 121 Cal App.4th Supp. 7 (2004), CIV Code 1962 Colorado $50.00 or 5% of past due rent C.R.S. § 00-00-000 Connecticut Not defined No statute Delaware 5% of the monthly rent amount Title 25, § 5501(d) Florida Not defined No statute Georgia “All contracts for rent shall bear interest from the time the rent is due” Hawaii 8% of the monthly rent amount § 521-21(f) Idaho Not defined No statute Illinois Outside Chicago – Not defined Chicago only – $10.00 per month for the first $500.00 in monthly rent plus five percent per month for any amount in excess of $500.00 in monthly rent for the late payment of rent. No statute 5-12-140(h) Indiana Not defined No statute Iowa If the rent does not exceed $700/month, the late fee cannot exceed more than $12/day per day or $60/month. If the rent is greater than $700/month, the late cannot exceed more than $20/day or $100/month.

  • Xxxxxxx, X Xxxxxxxx

  • Xxxxxxxx, X X. Xxxxxx, as Trustee .................. 00 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxxxxx 00000

  • Xxxxxxxxx, X Xxxxxxx Chairman & CEO Barangay Bagumbayan Paracale, Camarines Norte Tel No. 0000-000-0000/000-0000 Email: xxxxxxxxx_xxxx@xxxxx.xxx November 4, 2008 November 3, 2033 Paracale, Camarines Norte Gold, Copper 173.9329 MPSA 273-2008-V Orophil Stonecraft, Inc. Xx. 0 Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxx November 26, 2008 November 25, 2033 Baao, Camarines Sur Perlite 141.1418 MPSA 279-2009-V Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, Et. Al. c/o Xx. Xxxxxxxx X. Abaño Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Law Offices Suite 1515 Tektite East Tower Phil Exchange Center Building Exchange Road, Ortigas Center Pasay City Tel No. (000) 000-0000 0000-000-0000 April 8, 2009 April 7, 2034 Bula, Camarines Sur Gypsum 171.6511 MINERAL AGREEMENT NUMBER CONTRACTOR DATE GRANTED DATE EXPIRY LOCATION MINERAL COMMODITY AREA (Has.) MPSA 297-2009-V Guo Long Mining Corp. Xxx Xxxx President Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Paracale Camarines Norte November 16, 2009 November 15, 2034 Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Camarines Norte Gold, Iron, etc 595.6522 MPSA 306-2009-V Pargum Consolidated Corporation Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx President 7th Floor, Corporate Business Center 000 Xxxxx Xx Xxxxx xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx Tel No.: 000-00-00 000-00-00 Fax No.: 000-00-00 000-00-00 December 23, 2009 December 22, 2034 Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, and Paracale, Camarines Norte Gold, etc. 476.6808 MPSA 329-2010-V Filminera Resources Corp March 23, 2010 March 22, 2035 Aroroy, Masbate Gold,etc 584.2034 MPSA 334-2010-V East Environ, Incorporated Xxxxxxxx X. Tolentino Unit J Primrose Building Rose Avenue, Xxxxx Village Las Piñas City May 27, 2010 May 27, 2035 Baao, Camarines Sur Perlite 62.1904 MPSA 300-2009-V Yinlu Bicol Mining Corporation Xxx Xxxx President Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Paracale Camarines Norte November 24, 2009 November 23, 2034 Paracale & Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Camarines Norte Iron, gold, etc. 663.0746 MINERAL AGREEMENT NUMBER CONTRACTOR DATE GRANTED DATE EXPIRY LOCATION MINERAL COMMODITY AREA (Has.) MPSA 308-2009-V MPSA UNDER REVIEW BY THE DENR Heirs of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx: XXXX. XXXXXXXX X. XXXXX Suite 2104 B, East Tower Philippine Stock Exchange Center Bldg. Eschange Road, Ortigas Center Pasig City XXXXXXX X. XXXXXXXX Unit 2002 B, West Park Alder Condominium Northgate Filinvest Corporate City, Alabang Muntinlupa City XXXXXXX X. XXXXXXXX 0-X Xxxxx Xxxxxx, San Antonio San Francisco Del Monte Quezon City NOTE : MPSA UNDER REVIEW BY THE OSEC December 18, 2009 December 17, 2034 Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Camarines Norte Iron, gold, etc. 153.7478

  • Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Xxxxxxxx “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or Subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.

  • Xxxxxx, X Xxxxxxxx --------------------------- Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.