Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx X Sample Clauses

Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx X. X. Xxxxxxxxx'x principal employment has been with Richard Berkeley Square House Xxxxx for more than the past five years. Xx. Xxxxxxxxx currently serves London W1X 6AN as a Managing Director of Insignia for Xxxxxxx Xxxxx (since Insignia's England acquisition of Xxxxxxx Xxxxx in 1998) and has been a director of Xxxxxxx Xxxxx since its inception in 1997. Xx. Xxxxxxxxx is a citizen of the United Kingdom. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx has been a Senior Vice President -- Human Resources of Insignia since August 1997. Prior to August 1997, Xx. Xxxxxx'x principal employment for more than the prior five years was as Director -- Human Resources of E&Y Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Real Estate Group, New York, New York. Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx'x principal employment has been with Xxxxxxx Xxxxx for Berkeley Square House more than the past five years. Xx. Xxxxxxxx currently serves as Chief London W1X 6AN Executive Officer of Xxxxxxx Xxxxx (since Insignia's acquisition of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx in 1998). Xx. Xxxxxxxx is a citizen of the United Kingdom. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx'x principal employment has been with Insignia for 000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx more than the past five years. Xx. Xxxxxxxx currently serves as an Suite 400 Executive Managing Director of Insignia (since July 1994) and as Nashville, TN 37205 President of Insignia Financial Services, a division of Insignia (since July 1994). Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx has been General Counsel and Secretary of Insignia 000 Xxxx Xxxxxx since March 1998. Prior to that time, Xx. Xxxxxxx'x principal occupation New York, NY 10166 was as a partner with the law firm of Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Xxxxx, LLP, New York, New York. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx'x principal employment has been with Insignia for 000 Xxxx Xxxxxx more than the past five years. Xx. Xxxxxxxx currently serves as a New York, NY 10166 Managing Director -- Investment Banking of Insignia (since July 1994).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx X. X. Xxxxxxxxx'x principal employment has been with Richard Berkeley Square House Xxxxx for more than the past five years. Xx. Xxxxxxxxx currently serves London W1X 6AN as a Managing Director of Insignia for Xxxxxxx Xxxxx (since Insignia's England acquisition of Xxxxxxx Xxxxx in 1998) and has been a director of Xxxxxxx Xxxxx since its inception in 1997. Xx. Xxxxxxxxx is a citizen of the United Kingdom.
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxx, Xxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Esq., Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx and Xxxxx Pittitieri.
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxx, former Chief Future Projects Engineer, BAe, Kingston, “Blue Steel and developments,” The history of the UK strategic deterrent, Royal Aeronautical Society, March 17 1999, London. 79 Xxxx, RAF nuclear deterrent forces, 198. 80 Xxxxxx, Vulcan’s hammer, 21. 81 AIR 14/4198, “Extending the life of the V-bomber force,” Bomber Command: TS Memorandum No. 14, July 26 1955. Xxxxxxxx identified six life extension options: aircraft performance, aircraft tactics, force tactics, countermeasures, use of decoys and use of support (eg. opening attacks by Canberras on reporting and control radars). On aircraft performance, there was limited scope for pushing height and speed within buffet boundary limits and the range of the flight. On aircraft tactics, the main choice was high or low. Here, he argued for low level attacks against “a certain proportion of targets within a limited range”. Force tactics hinged on dispersal in time and space, with limited dispersion the “reasonable compromise”.82 In the mid-1950s there was time to take considered response decisions; hostile bombers would give ample warning in that very different, pre-ballistic missile world. Xxxxxxxx was prompted to observe: Although statements have been made that the bomber force must retaliate instantly, whether by day or by night, there is no denying the fact that by day the probability that a reasonable percentage of bombers reach their targets is very small. Plans must therefore be based on night attacks if we wish to retaliate effectively and not just make an ineffective gesture.83 On countermeasures, Xxxxxxxx referred to chaff (“Window”), Airborne Interception (AI) jammers and warning equipment: “… the continued survival of the V-Force as the Russian defences improve will depend on the success with which these measures can be introduced and used.” The Chief Research Officer was not above referring to “exotics”, including concepts for unmanned, ECM-equipped decoys. It had been suggested that a decoy would cost only 1/30th of a V-bomber and that scaling back the V-Force by 20 bombers would fund 600 decoys. Unfortunately, these calculations were wrong – they failed to take account of decoy assembly site and launch site costs. This reduced the cost advantage to 1/6th of a bomber. Nevertheless, xxxxxx represented a genuine but undeveloped option for reducing bomber losses.84 As might be expected, Xxxxxxxx argued for the powered bomb: “… it would delay the obsolescence of the V-bomber force at least un...
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, and each of them, as the Depositor's or such Trustee's true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for the Depositor or such Trustee or in the Depositor's or such Trustee's name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to the 1933 Act Registration Statement and the 1934 Act Registration Statement (if required) and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Commission, the Exchange and administrators of the state securities or blue sky laws, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the Depositor or such Trustee might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their respective substitute or substitutes, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx The University of Olivet Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxx Vice President of Academic Affairs Siena Heights University Xxxxxx XxXxx Xxxxxx XxXxx Associate Vice President of Academic Affairs Spring Arbor University Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx, Ph.X. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx, Ph.D. President University of Detroit Mercy
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx X. 0) XXXXXXXX XXXXX (having SWIFT Code XXXXXXXX000), as receiving bank nominated by you for credit to the account of you with Bank of China, Limited, Shanghai Branch (account No. 444259237023) or through other receiving bank to be nominated by you from time to time, in favour of you or your assignee.
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx X. Fieldston E-mail: xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!