CONCLUSION. In conclusion, the Defendant asks the Board to find that any commercial use of the term “tryg” does not infringe upon the Complainant’s rights and that the Complainant does not hold exclusive rights over the term “tryg”, especially when said term is used in its dictionary meaning, as it is the case for the Domain Name. The Defendant further asks the Board to dismiss the Complainant’s claim to have the Domain Name transferred and to find that the Domain Name is not infringing upon the Complainant’s trademark rights.”
CONCLUSION. In summary, this review highlighted the geographical disparities in job satisfaction research among pharmacists and PTs worldwide. The findings suggested a lack of studies focusing on job satisfaction among PTs globally, with a notable concentration of research within the field in the USA compared to other parts of the world. Given the diverse survey instruments utilized across the articles, direct comparisons of study outcomes posed a challenge. Nevertheless, a clear trend was observed in the Middle East and Africa, where job satisfaction was generally lower compared to Europe and North America. This discrepancy suggested that Western countries were more satisfied, which might be due to better resources and enhanced infrastructure supporting their work environments. The findings also highlighted the pivotal role of economic stability, professional development opportunities, robust collegial relationships, and favorable work environments in shaping job satisfaction across all regions of the world. Additionally, insights from multiple countries highlighted the significant contribution of clinical activities to enhancing job satisfaction among hospital em- ployees. Ultimately, this study underscored the importance of addressing these key factors to enhance job satisfaction and retain skilled pharmacy professionals worldwide. By expanding research initiatives and addressing regional differences, the global healthcare community could develop more targeted strategies aimed at enhancing job satisfaction, thereby potentially elevating healthcare outcomes across diverse settings.
CONCLUSION. In the light of the foregoing considerations, the Commission, acting under the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty, requests the United Kingdom to submit its comments and to provide all such information as may help to assess the aid, within one month of the date of receipt of this letter. It requests your authorities to forward a copy of this letter to the potential recipient of the aid immediately. The Commission wishes to remind the United Kingdom that Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty has suspensory effect, and would draw your attention to Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, which provides that all unlawful aid may be recovered from the recipient.«
CONCLUSION. It is essential for pharmacists and PTs to be satisfied with their jobs to optimize workplace performance and ensure the delivery of the highest quality of care to customers and patients. Therefore, this study aimed to address the job satisfaction of pharmacists and PTs in commu- nity- and hospital pharmacies in Denmark. The psychometric validation of the Danish MJS questionnaire showed that it possessed good internal consistency, indicating that the items on the scale were highly correlated and measured the same underlying construct. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated an acceptable model fit for the seven-factor structure of the MJS, although certain fit indices suggested room for improvement in the design of the questionnaire. Few selected items in the MJS scale did not load perfectly with their subscales, however the overall scale proved to be a reliable and valid tool for measuring job satisfaction among Danish pharmacists and PTs working in pharmacy settings. The study revealed a moderate level of overall job satisfaction among pharmacists and PTs working in both community- and hospital pharmacies, with satisfaction with pay being at the lower end of the scale range and satisfaction with professional support and standards of care being at the higher end. Additionally, this study found that pharmacists generally reported higher satisfaction compared to PTs. Pharmacists were more satisfied with pay, prospects, and overall job satisfaction, while PTs were less satisfied due to lower salaries and limited advance- ment opportunities. A comparison of job satisfaction in two different pharmacy settings, showed a higher job sat- isfaction of employees in hospital pharmacies compared to those in community pharmacies. Hospital pharmacists and PTs had a significantly higher overall job satisfaction, compared to their counterparts in community pharmacies. They were also more satisfied with their work- load, professional support, and personal satisfaction, likely due to the structured and supportive environment in hospital settings. Conversely, community pharmacy employees reported higher satisfaction with prospects and training, potentially due to the more diverse career paths avail- able in community settings. This study found no significant differences in job satisfaction based on gender or region in Denmark. However, age played a significant role, with younger participants consistently re- porting lower satisfaction levels compared to older age groups. ...
CONCLUSION. The Commission has at this stage doubts as to the compatibility of the aid for the conversion to biomass of the Lynemouth power plant with the internal market. In particular, the Commission doubts that the aid is limited to the minimum necessary and that the distortions of competition on upstream biomass market are not too significant. In accordance with Article 4(4) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 the Commission has decided to open the formal investigation procedure, thereby inviting the UK to submit its comments. In the light of the foregoing considerations, the Commission, acting under the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the TFEU, requests the UK to submit its comments and to provide all information which may help to assess the measure, within one month of the date of receipt of this letter. It requests the UK authorities to forward a copy of this letter to the potential recipients of the aid immediately. The Commission wishes to remind the UK that Article 108(3) of the TFEU has suspensory effect, and would draw your attention to Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 (27), which provides that all unlawful aid may be recovered from the recipient. The Commission warns the UK that it will inform interested parties by publishing this letter and a meaningful summary of it in the Official Journal of the European Union. It will also inform interested parties in the EFTA countries which are signatories to the EEA Agreement, by publication of a notice in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union and will inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority by sending a copy of this letter. All such interested parties will be invited to submit their comments within one month of the date of such publication.’
CONCLUSION. We maintain our position as supported by the policy wording and explained in the various corre- spondence sent on our behalf, latest in Document 47, that the policy was properly cancelled. No premium has been paid by [klageren]. No indemnity is due and we respectfully request the Board to make a ruling to this effect. If [klageren] or his brother have not yet settled the outstanding defendant's costs connected with the failed and discontinued cases from 2014, we can only suggest that they do so immediately." I mail af 15/3 2018 til nævnet har klageren fremsendt en kopi af et brev skrevet til engelske "Legal Ombudsman" i 2014 vedrørende hans advokats behandling af retssagen. Han har hertil blandt andet bemærket: "I find it extremely unreasonable that an insurance company that we depended on can use the very thing that we were insured for, to void our insurance policy. Surely any case that is ruled against in court means that the Judge preferred the other side's evidence, and so we should still be covered. After a long process of filing a previous document with the Financial Services Ombudsman, we found that A U Insurance were underwritten by a Dutch firm, which mean that the UK FSO had no jurisdiction. We were then directed to the Dutch FSO, who after a long process told us that the company in question was now no longer trading. We were advised that a company called BCR Le- gal were handling the company's affairs. We followed their complaints procedure fully and came up against the following issues -