Examples of Core damage frequency in a sentence
PRA shall be updated continuously to reflect plant and procedure modifications and changes in reli- ability data (Living PRA).Guide YVL 2.8 includes the following probabil- istic safety goals:• Core damage frequency less than 1∙10-5/year• Large radioactive release (> 100 TBq Cs-137) frequency less than 5∙10-7/year.
PRA shall be updated continuously to reflect plant and procedure modifications and changes in reliability data.Guide YVL A.7 includes the following probabil- istic safety goals:• Core damage frequency less than 1∙10-5/year• Large radioactive release (> 100 TBq Cs-137) frequency less than 5∙10-7/year.
Core damage frequency (‘‘CDF’’)7 was the measure used to assess the safety significance of the concern.
Core damage frequency (CDF) estimates from Level 1 PRAs and conditional probability of (early) containment failure or bypass (CPCFB) estimates from Level 2 PRAs can be compared to corresponding safety goal screening criteria to determine the need for a cost-benefit analysis as part of the regulatory analyses.
Core damage frequency (CDF) - The calculated CDF should demonstrate that the sum of frequencies of all event sequences that can lead to significant core degradation shall be less than 10-5 per reactor year.2. Small release frequency (SRF) - The calculated SRF should demonstrate that the sum of frequencies of all event sequences that can lead to a release to the environment of more than 1015 becquerels of iodine-131 shall be less than 10-5 per reactor year.
PRA shall be updated contin- uously to reflect plant and procedure modifications and changes in reliability data (Living PRA).Guide YVL 2.8 includes the following probabil- istic safety goals:• Core damage frequency less than 1∙10–5/year• Large radioactive release (> 100 TBq Cs-137) frequency less than 5∙10–7/year.These safety goals apply as such to new plant units.
According to the above paper, the Core damage frequency (CDF) of the proposed reacor in one in 10 million reactor years.
The CDF and LERF metrics are defined in a functional sense as follows: • Core damage frequency (CDF) is defined as the sum of the frequencies of those accidents that result in uncovery and heatup of the reactor core to the point at which prolonged oxidation and severe fuel damage are anticipated and involving enough of the core, if released, to result in offsite public health effects.
Figure 7: Core damage frequency (CDF) per year and legal basis and supervisory decision making.
The following is a summary of key design objectives for the ABWR: • Plant availability factor of 87% or greater.• 24-month refueling cycle.• Design life of 60 years.• Core damage frequency of <10-6.• 52-month construction schedule.Figure 4.3 General Electric• 20% reduction in capital cost ($/kWh) vs.