Google Library Project definition

Google Library Project or the “GLP” means the program(s) pursuant to which Google obtains Books and other works from libraries or other sources (including through book drives, from Rightsholders directly or elsewhere, but not including the Google Partner Program), for the purposes of Digitizing them (if not obtained in Digitized form) and including them in GBS, whatever such program(s) may be called by Google from time to time.

Examples of Google Library Project in a sentence

• Potentially massive digital libraries such as the Google Library Project [17], the Open Content Alliance [20] and the EU i2010 Initiative [21] emphasize high volume digitization based primarily on automatically generated output of page images.

• The court can also look to prior cases for guidance even though determining whether a challenged activity constitutes a fair use “calls for a case-by-case analysis.”39 Although it is impossible to predict what a court would find when confronted with an actual case, and this report will not attempt to do so, it does highlight some of the many questions that the Google Library Project raised regarding each of the four statutory “fair use” factors.

• Epstein* A Lecture given as part of The Henry Schneider Speaker Series Columbia Law School, January 23, 2006 As on so many other issues, I come to the question of Google Print — known in polite company as the Google Library Project — as an outsider.

• Proskine, supra note 95, at 232 (arguing that it is ―likely that the Google Library Project could be deemed a fair use‖); Travis, supra note 7, at 91-92 (arguing that Google Books project is fair use).

• A key administrator at UM who played a central role in forging the UM-Google partnership explained:The fact that the Google Library Project causes some people to grow concerned about their livelihood is ultimately a moral argument, not an economic one.Concerns that mass digitization would undermine existing business models that have enabled some members of the literary and publishing world to flourish economically was not, without more, a compelling justification for resisting change.

• There is no more overhead for a function with &OPTIONAL than there is for one without, and there is no runtime dispatching on the number of arguments for typical functions.

• JPEG2000 by contrast does not have the compression problem and is a format of choice in North America by institutions such as the Library of Congress and the Google Library Project, which suggests a secure method for the foreseeable future.

• Jonathan Band, The Google Library Project: Both Sides of the Story, 1 PLAGIARY 1, 3-7 (2007) (describing Google‘s fair use argument in the actual litigation).

• Lattice Boltzmann numer- ical solutions of the dynamical equations of motion of the drop provide a close quantitative match to the experimental results.

• First, the participation by the Libraries in the Google Library Project provided enormous commercial and competitive benefits to Google, which uses the digital works to increase traffic to the Google website, improve the experience of Googleusers, and generate additional revenue through advertising sold on Google’s search result pages.