Examples of Interpretive Standards in a sentence
This opinion is limited by and is in accordance with, the January 1, 1992, edition of the Interpretive Standards applicable to Legal Opinions to Third Parties in Corporate Transactions adopted by the Legal Opinion Committee of the Corporate and Banking Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia.
This opinion is limited by and is in accordance with, the January 1, 1992, edition of the Interpretive Standards applicable to Legal Opinions to Third Parties in Corporate Transactions adopted by the Legal Opinion committee of the Corporate and Banking Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia.
This opinion letter is limited by, and is in accordance with, the January 1, 1992 edition of the Interpretive Standards applicable to Legal Opinions to Third Parties in Corporate Transactions adopted by the Legal Opinion Committee of the Corporate and Banking Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia which Interpretive Standards are incorporated herein by this reference.
This opinion is limited by, and is in accordance with, the January 1, 1992, edition of the Interpretive Standards applicable to Legal Opinions to Third Parties in Corporate Transactions adopted by the Legal Opinion Committee of the Corporate and Banking Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia.
If a Document covered by the Remedies Opinion contains no governing law provision, or contains a governing law provision which names the Opining Jurisdiction, the Remedies Opinion means that if Company is brought before a proper court of the Opining Jurisdiction to enforce rights under the Document, and if such court applies the substantive law of the Opining Jurisdiction, the result will be as stated in the Opinion and these Interpretive Standards.
This opinion letter is limited by, and is in accordance with, the January 1, 1992 edition of the Interpretive Standards (the "Interpretive Standards") Applicable to Legal Opinions to Third Parties in Corporate Transactions adopted by the Legal Opinion Committee of the Corporate and Banking Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia, which Interpretive Standards are incorporated in this Opinion Letter by this reference.
Opinion Giver and Opinion Recipient may agree upon arbitrary or hypothetical assumptions that may not be true and upon qualifications, standards or interpretations inconsistent with these Interpretive Standards.
An Opinion to the effect that no consent, approval, authorization or other action by, or filing with, any governmental authority is required for Company's execution and delivery of the Documents and consummation of the Transaction (No Consent Opinion) is subject to the understandings set forth in Interpretive Standards 2 and 27(2) and (4).
This opinion letter is limited by, and is in accordance with, the January 1, 1992 edition of the Interpretive Standards Applicable to Legal Opinions to Third Parties in Corporate Transactions adopted by the Legal Opinion Committee of the Corporate and Banking Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia (the "Interpretive Standards"), which Interpretive Standards are incorporated in this opinion letter by this reference.
Any part of these Interpretive Standards, however, may be overridden by a specific statement in an Opinion Letter which supersedes a contrary Interpretive Standard.