Examples of Landfill Footprint in a sentence
OU 01 Alternatives 4 (Landfill Capping with a Part 360 Cap – Existing Landfill Footprint) and 8 (Partial Removal, Ex-Situ Stabilization and On-Site Placement with In-Situ Stabilization) have the next lowest costs.
Based on this review, the potential effects, mitigation or compensation measures, and net effects associated with the Preferred Alternative Landfill Footprint were confirmed and documented.
The potential environmental effects, mitigation or compensation measures to address the potential adverse environmental effects, and the remaining net effects following the application of the mitigation or compensation measures were identified for the Preferred Alternative Landfill Footprint.
OU 01 Alternatives 4 and 5 (Landfill Capping with a Part 360 Cap – Existing or Extended Landfill Footprint), 6 (Landfill Capping with a Clean Soil Cover - Extended Landfill Footprint), 7 (Partial Removal and Off-Site Disposal with In-Situ Stabilization) and 8 (Partial Removal, Ex-Situ Stabilization and On-Site Placement with In-Situ Stabilization) also satisfy this criterion, with the waste capped under Alternatives 4, 5 and 6, or stabilized under Alternatives 7 and 8.
The long-term effectiveness of Alternative 6 (Landfill Capping with a Clean Soil Cover - Extended Landfill Footprint) is uncertain as leaching of lead from the ash waste could occur through the infiltration of precipitation and snow melt into the waste.
OU 01 Alternatives 4 and 5 (Landfill Capping with aPart 360 Cap – Existing or Extended Landfill Footprint), 7 (Partial Removal and Off-Site Disposal with In-Situ Stabilization) and 8 (Partial Removal, Ex-Situ Stabilization and On-Site Placement with In-Situ Stabilization) also satisfy this criterion, although these alternatives require environmental easements, long-term monitoring and maintenance to ensure their long-term effectiveness.
The Preferred Alternative Landfill Footprint was refined based on stakeholder comments received and in order to further avoid or mitigate potential adverse environmental effects, and is illustrated in Figure 1.
The mobility of the on-site waste is reduced under OU 01 Alternatives 4 and 5 (Landfill Capping with a Part 360 Cap – Existing or Extended Landfill Footprint), 7 (Partial Removal and Off-Site Disposal with In-Situ Stabilization) and 8 (Partial Removal, Ex-Situ Stabilization and On-Site Placement with In-Situ Stabilization).
OU 01 Alternatives 4 and 5 (Landfill Capping with a Part 360 Cap – Existing or Extended Landfill Footprint), 6 (Landfill Capping with a Clean Soil Cover - Extended Landfill Footprint), 7 (Partial Removal and Off-Site Disposal with In-Situ Stabilization) and 8 (Partial Removal, Ex-Situ Stabilization and On-Site Placement with In-SituStabilization) also satisfy this criterion, although ash waste remains at OU 01 under these alternatives.
OU 01 Alternative 6 (Landfill Capping with a Clean Soil Cover - Extended Landfill Footprint) has the lowest cost, followed by Alternative 5 (Landfill Capping with a Part 360 Cap – Extended Landfill Footprint).