Examples of Net energy savings in a sentence
Environmental Impacts:• Net reduction in landfill space of 40 m3• Net GHG reductions of 2 - 11 tonnes CO2e• Net energy savings of 10 - 130 GJ (over 20 barrels of crude oil)• Program guarantees safe processing of smoke alarmsThe net reduction in landfill space was estimated to be approximately 40 m3 resulting from the EPR program for smoke alarms.
Environmental Impacts:• Approximately 6,400 - 36,000 m3 in landfill space savings• Net GHG reductions of over 3,300 tonnes CO2e• Net energy savings of 68,850 GJ (equivalent to energy content of 11,000 barrels of crude oil)As shown in Table 6 the EPR programs for batteries saved approximately 6,400 - 36,000 m3 in landfill space compared to the status quo scenario.
Net energy savings provided by the system in automatic and manual mode Similar patterns can be found when comparing the system using manual and automatic control mode based on cost, as shown in Figure 4.
Environmental Impacts:• Approximately 115,00 - 367,000 m3 in landfill space savings• Net GHG reduction of 93,500 - 93,600 tonnes CO2e• Net energy savings of 1.6 million GJ.
Environmental Impacts:• Landfill space savings of 13,000 - 40,000 m3• Net GHG reduction of over 1,000 tonnes CO2e• Net energy savings of over 100,000 GJ or almost 20,000 barrels of crude oilThe EPR program for tires saved landfill space of approximately 13,000 - 40,000 m3.
PacifiCorp’s cost-effectiveness results for the portfolio achieving the targets from AEG with PacifiCorp’s adjustments to incremental measure costs are provided in Exhibit G, Portfolio Cost-Effectiveness to Achieve Targets (with adjusted measure costs) and summarized below.Table 11: Portfolio Cost Effectiveness to Achieve Targets (with adjusted measure costs) Program YearPTRCTRC Net energy savings and all costs, including those for internal labor (overhead) and evaluations were included in the assessment.
Net energy savings (Table 5) are nearly evenly split between reduced winter heating and summer air conditioning.
Part of these errors or uncertainties can be corrected or reduced through ex- post verifications (e.g. automatized plausibility checks, on-site inspections).Depending on the evaluation objectives, other methods can be used to investigate the reliability of the scaled savings (e.g. tracking errors, verifying the relevance of the data or assumptions used), assess actual energy savings or investigate additionality / causality (see in section 4 Calculating Gross and Net energy savings).
When using engineering estimates, additionality has to be taken into account in the calculation assumptions (see Calculating Gross and Net energy savings in section 4).
Net energy savings = Gross energy savings * double counting coefficient * (1 + spillover effect - free- rider effect) (formula 1) where:- double counting coefficient (0÷1) considering mutual energy savings from different EEMs or public programs;- spill-over energy effect – indirect energy savings from EEMs or public programs;- free-rider effect – energy savings by free-riders or those program participants who would have undertaken EEMs anyway.