Examples of Park Bond Act of 2000 in a sentence
The California Legislature, through the Park Bond Act of 2000, acknowledges the importance of Acquisition, Development (Rehabilitation and Restoration), and Interpretation of historical and archeological resources in California.
OHP and the Commission are please to announce the availability of $8,506,000 in statewide competitive grant funds from the Park Bond Act of 2000.
For Projects funded with Park Bond Act of 2000 funds in excess of $750,000 and/or those Projects in areas of high visibility (such as near a major thoroughfare) a sign is required during construction.
Resolution 2002-240 adopted authorizing the State Department of Parks and Recreation to amend contracts between the State and County and between the State and Auburn Recreation District, transferring $75,000 of grant funds under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 (Park Bond Act of 2000) from the County to the Auburn Recreation District for the new Skate Park at the American River Overlook Park in Auburn.
Unless specifically listed below for additional time, performance time for CLIN X100, Routine COM Repair and Replacement, includes all other work items without adjustment, when ordered.
Payments All incurred costs shall be accompanied by backup documentation for all-costs -- including grant and matching share costs.Project Sign All Projects funded by the Park Bond Act of 2000 shall include a sign acknowledging the source of funds pursuant to the guidelines developed by the Resources Agency.
Alternate signage must be clearly recognizable as a Park Bond Act of 2000 Project.
Universal LogoAll signs will contain a universal logo (see Appendix N) which will be equated with the Park Bond Act of 2000 statewide.
Grantee's Match Amount: At least 50% of total Project cost Grantee's Match Types: Local, State (with restrictions*), Federal and private funds, and In-Kind resources (*Money awards from other Park Bond Act of 2000 competitive grant programs may not be eligible as match.
We must consider the frequency with which legislative gains have been repealed, turned back by the voters, or foregone altogether, as well as the serious risk of repeal of legislative gains after each election cycle in which political power shifts to a different political party.