Examples of Prosecution Request in a sentence
Bionics will have thirty (30) days to fulfill the Prosecution Request.
If Bionics fails to complete the Prosecution Request after 30 days of receiving the Prosecution Request, the Company may independently file and prosecute the patent application of the Prosecution Request, and the Company will bear all Prosecution Costs and will control the remainder of the prosecution for the patent application of the Prosecution Request.
Brima et al., Case No. SCSL-2004-16-PT, Decision on Prosecution Request for Leave to Amend the Indictment (May 6, 2004).
In addition, provided that Licensee is in compliance with its obligations in Section 11.2, The Regents will undertake all patent actions requested pursuant to a valid Patent Prosecution Request (excluding any request to undertake any action that The Regents or its counsel determines would be adverse to The Regents such as, for example, a request to narrow any claim of any patents licensed hereunder).
If CPI or one of its Affiliates fails to complete the Prosecution Request within 30 days of receiving the Prosecution Request, SVI may independently file and Prosecute the patent application or maintain the issued Patent that was the subject of the Prosecution Request, and SVI will bear all Prosecution Costs and will control the remainder of the Prosecution for such patent application or the maintenance of such issued Patent.
In addition, if Licensee fails to timely (i) provide a Patent Prosecution Request pursuant to Section 11.1, or (ii) pay for any Patent Costs as required by Section 11.2, then The Regents shall have the right to terminate this Agreement with respect to the applicable patent application(s) and patent(s) (subject to Licensee’s option to cure such breach pursuant to Section 8.4).
LID includes a set of practices that when incorporated into the early stages of design, reduce site runoff and related pollutants.
Prosecution Request for a Finding of Non- Compliance Against the Republic of the Sudan in the Case of The Prosecutor v Omar Al Bashir Pursuant to Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute) Case ICC-02/05-01/09-219 (19 December 2014); see also Prosecutor v Omar Hassan Ahmed al Bashir (Decision on Prosecutor’s Request for a Finding of Non-Compliance against the Republic of the Sudan) Case ICC-02/05-01/09-227 paras 13-16 (9 March 2015).
First, the Pre-Trial Chamber found that the Prosecution Request should be characterised as a request to introduce a “new or additional charge” of rape rather than a mere amendment to the charges.
This issue is an identifiable subject or topic arising from the Decision, and its resolution is “essential for the determination of matters arising under the judicial cause under examination”.17 Indeed, the Pre-Trial Chamber found that the Prosecution Request sought to add a new or additional charge of rape and thus it required stricter scrutiny and a confirmation hearing which would necessarily delay the proceedings.