Reasonable suspicion drug testing definition
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means drug testing based on a belief that an employee is using or has used drugs in violation of the County’s policy drawn from specific objective and articulable facts and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts in light of experience. Among other things, such facts and inferences may be based upon:
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means alcohol or drug testing based on a belief that a student is using or has used alcohol or drugs in violation of this policy drawn from specific, objective facts and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts in light of experience. Among other things, the facts and inferences may be based upon:
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means drug testing conducted on a student because individualized and objective evidence exists to support the conclusion that a student (1) has engaged in the use of alcohol and/or illegal drugs in violation of applicable policies, laws, and regulations; or (2) appears to be impaired. Facts that could give rise to reasonable suspicion include, without limitation: observed possession or use of illegal drugs or alcohol; the odor of alcohol or drugs; impaired behavior such as slurred speech; decreased motor coordination; difficulty in maintaining balance; marked changes in personality or academic performance or behavior; reports of observed drug or alcohol use; an arrest or conviction for a drug or alcohol related offense; positive pre-placement or other drug tests; or newly discovered evidence of drug test tampering.
Examples of Reasonable suspicion drug testing in a sentence
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means drug testing conducted on a student because individualized and objective evidence exists to support the conclusion that a student (1) has engaged in the use of alcohol and/or illegal drugs in violation of applicable policies, laws, and regulations; or (2) appears to be impaired.
Reasonable suspicion drug testing shall apply to all students in grades 7-12 enrolled in the Dekalb County School System.
Reasonable suspicion drug testing shall be limited to testing for cocaine, marijuana, opiates, amphetamines, phencyclidine, benzodiazepines, methaqualone, meperidine (Demerol), and barbiturates.
There are a number of ongoing Clean Water Act (CWA) issues that pertain to WSWC policies or are otherwise of interest that the Committee will monitor and address on an as needed basis.
The implementation points of the CMS in this regard include that construction of facilities associated with recreation will be allowed where the facilities are appropriate to the recreation opportunity identified in that area, and that the effects of facilities on natural and historic resources will be monitored.
More Definitions of Reasonable suspicion drug testing
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means drug testing based on a belief that an employee is using or has used drugs in violation of the employer's policy drawn from specific objective and articulable facts and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts in light of experience. Reasonable suspicion drug testing may not be required except upon the recommendation of a supervisor who is at least one level of supervision higher than the immediate supervisor of the employee in question. Among other things, such facts and inferences may be based upon:
1. Observable phenomena while at work, such as direct observation of drug use or of the physical symptoms or manifestations of being under the influence of a drug.
2. Abnormal conduct or erratic behavior while at work or a significant deterioration in work performance.
3. A report of drug use, provided by a reliable and credible source, which has been independently corroborated.
4. Evidence that an individual has tampered with a drug test during employment with the current employer.
5. Information that an employee has caused, or contributed to, an accident while at work.
6. Evidence that an employee has used, possessed, sold, solicited, or transferred drugs while working or while on the employer's premises or while operating the employer's vehicle, machinery, or equipment.
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means drug testing based on a belief that an employee is using or has used drugs in violation of the employer's policy, drawn from specific objective and articulable facts and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts in light of experience. Among other things, such facts and inferences may be based upon a report of drug use, provided by a reliable and credible source, or information that an employee has been involved in an accident while at work.
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means drug testing based on a belief that an employee is using or has used drugs in violation of the employer’s policy drawn from specific objective and articulable facts and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts in light of experience. Reasonable suspicion drug testing may not be required except upon the recommendation of a supervisor who is at least one level of supervision higher than the immediate supervisor of the employee in question. Among other things, such facts and infer- ences may be based upon:
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means drug or alcohol testing based on a belief that an employee is using or has used drugs or alcohol in violation of the Rule 36 employers’ policy drawn from specific objective and articulable facts and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts in light of experience.
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means drug testing that is
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means drug testing based on a
Reasonable suspicion drug testing means drug testing based on a belief that an employee is using or has used drugs in violation of the employer’s policy, drawn from specific objective and articulable facts and reasonable inferences drawn from those facts in light of experience. Reasonable suspicion drug testing shall not be required except upon the written recommendation of a supervisor who is at least one level of supervision higher than the immediate supervisor of the employee in question provided that, the recommending supervisor has received “Supervisory Training for EAP”. Also, reasonable suspicion drug testing must be based upon the direct observation of at least two corroborating witnesses. Furthermore, the supervisor’s written recommendation as to reasonable suspicion must be approved in writing by the Deputy Chief of Operations. At this time, only the Deputy Chief of Operations (or person acting in this capacity in the absence of the actual Deputy Chief) may order reasonable suspicion drug testing. This written recommendation shall include the circumstances, which formed the basis of the determination that reasonable suspicion existed to warrant testing. Reasonable suspicion is defined as the following:
a. Observable phenomena while at work, such as direct observation of drug use, or the physical symptoms or manifestations of being under the influence of a drug.
b. Significant deterioration in work performance.
c. Evidence that an individual has tampered with a drug test during his employment with the current employer.
d. Evidence that an employee has used, possessed, sold, or solicited drugs while working or while on the employer’s premises or while operating the employer’s vehicle, machinery, or equipment.