Substantial right means a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.
Substantial right means a right that the United States Constitution,
Substantial right means a right that *** a statute *** entitles a person to enforce or protect.
Examples of Substantial right in a sentence
Substantial right violated by evidence of certain collateral offenses.
More Definitions of Substantial right
Substantial right means a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect." R.C. 2505.02(A)(1). It involves the notion of a legal right that will be enforced and protected by law. Noble, supra, at 94, citing North v. Smith (1906), 73 Ohio
Substantial right means a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect." R.C. 2505.02(A)(1). It involves the notion of a legal right that will be enforced and protected by law. Noble, supra, at 94, citing North v. Smith (1906), 73 Ohio St. 247, 249, 76 N.E. 619. DeAscentis' claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, accounting and winding up, breach of fiduciary duties, conversion, fraud and promissory estoppel related to the Sharon Woods Village projects and dismissed by the trial court, clearly involve substantial rights. But unless the trial court's order affects these substantial rights, the order is not final. Burt v. Harris, 10th Dist. No. 03AP-194, 2004- Ohio-756, at ¶12. An order that affects a substantial right has been perceived to be one which, if not immediately appealable, would foreclose appropriate relief in the future. Bell
Substantial right means a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.” R.C. 2505.02(A)(1); State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metro Hous. Auth. (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 543, 545, 684 N.E.2d 72 (“A ‘substantial right’ for purposes of R.C. 2505.02 is a legal right enforced and protected by law”). The court of appeals’ order, which grants a writ of prohibition preventing Judge Panioto and the domestic relations court from proceeding on any substantive matters, affects their substantial rights to proceed in cases involving domestic relations matters. R.C. 3105.011 (“The court of common pleas including divisions of courts of domestic relations, has full equitable powers and jurisdiction appropriate to the determination of all domestic relations matters”); R.C. 2301.03(B)(2) (“The judges of the [Hamilton County] court of common pleas * * * elected and designated as judges of the court of common pleas, division of domestic relations * * * shall have assigned to them all divorce, dissolution of marriage, legal separation, and annulment cases coming before the court”). Therefore, the order meets the first part of the R.C. 2505.02(B)(1) definition of “final order.”
Substantial right means “a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect.” R.C. 2505.02(A)(1). An order that affects a substantial right is “one which, if not immediately appealable, would foreclose appropriate relief in the future.” Circelli v. Keenan Construction, 165 Ohio App.3d 494, 2006-Ohio-949, 847 N.E.2d 39 (10th Dist.), ¶17 quoting
Substantial right means a right that the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, a statute, the common law, or a rule of procedure entitles a person to enforce or protect." R.C. 2505.02(A)(1). It involves the notion of a legal right that will be enforced and protected by law. Noble, supra, at 94, citing North v. Smith (1906), 73 Ohio St. 247, 249, 76 N.E. 619. DeAscentis' claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, accounting and winding up, breach of fiduciary duties, conversion, fraud and promissory estoppel related to the Sharon Woods Village projects and dismissed by the trial court, clearly involve substantial rights. But unless the trial court's order affects these substantial rights, the order is not final. Burt v. Harris, 10th Dist. No. 03AP-194, 2004- Ohio-756, at ¶12. An order that affects a substantial right has been perceived to be one which, if not immediately appealable, would foreclose appropriate relief in the future. Bell