Xxxxxxxx II definition

Xxxxxxxx II is defined in the first paragraph of this Settlement Agreement.

Xxxxxxxx II is a lawsuit filed on February 10, 2014 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging, among other things, that the defendants used their control over HP and its corporate suffrage process in effectuating, directly participating in and/or aiding and abetting violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, and violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The complaint asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, and breach of the duty of candor. The claims arise out of the circumstances at HP relating to its 2013 and 2014 proxy statements, the departure of Xx. Xxxx as Chairman of HP’s Board of Directors and HP’s Chief Executive Officer, alleged violations of the FCPA, and HP’s acquisition of 3PAR Inc. and Autonomy Corporation plc (“Autonomy”). On February 25, 2014, the court issued an order granting HP’s administrative motion to relate Xxxxxxxx II to Xxxxxxxx I. On April 8, 2014, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to stay the action pending resolution of Xxxxxxxx I by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Xxxxxxxx II is defined in the recitals.

Examples of Xxxxxxxx II in a sentence

• Ford denies and continues to deny any wrongdoing or legal liability arising out of any of the allegations, claims and contentions made against Ford in Xxxxxxxx I or Xxxxxxxx II and in the course of the negotiation of the MOU or this Settlement Agreement.

• Xxxxxxxx II and each of the Xxxxxxxx II Members hereby waive any rights or interests they may have in all such assets.

• The amount of Property to be returned to Xxxxxxxx II as part of this Agreement shall be proportionally adjusted based on the amount of Returned Shares delivered by Xxxxxxxx II and the Xxxxxxxx II Members.

• Each Shed constructed ‘community needs’ in slightly different ways.

• The closing shall not occur unless the amount of Returned Shares consists of at least 70% of the Merger Shares that were initially issued to the Xxxxxxxx II Members as part of the Merger in June 2014.

• The return of the Merger Shares as set forth in Section 1 herein and the return of a portion of the Property to Xxxxxxxx II as set forth in Section 2 herein shall take place at a closing (the “Closing”), to be held at such date, time and place as shall be determined by the parties at the same time as the closing of the other Company transactions described in Section 17 herein.

• As consideration for the Merger, Dala DE issued 10,000,000 shares of its common stock (the “Merger Shares”) to Dala NV’s sole member Xxxxxxxx II in exchange for receiving all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Dala NV.

• For example, if 100% of the originally-issued Merger Shares are returned by the Xxxxxxxx II Members as Returned Shares, Dala will receive 10,000,000 common shares for cancellation and will then return to Xxxxxxxx 75% of the acreage in the Property, or 60,000 acres (with Dala retaining 20,000 acres in the Property).

• Xxxxxxxx II and each of the Xxxxxxxx II Members shall fully and promptly cooperate with Dala with respect to the review and completion of financial statements and reports required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for Dala or for any requests from any third party required to be provided, including from any federal or state regulator or auditor.

• REQUIREDAdmission Categories‌In addition to regular admission into one of the degree-granting (Master’s or Ph.D.) programs, the following special categories are available.Provisional AdmissionA candidate whose application is incomplete, because not all of the required supporting materials have been received, may be allowed to register as a provisional student for one semester only, at the discretion of the dean.

More Definitions of Xxxxxxxx II

Xxxxxxxx II is a lawsuit filed on February 10, 2014 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging, among other things, that the defendants used their control over HP Inc. and its corporate suffrage process in effectuating, directly participating in and/or aiding and abetting violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, and violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The complaint asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, and breach of the duty of candor. The claims arise out of the circumstances at HP Inc. relating to its 2013 and 2014 proxy statements, the departure of Xx. Xxxx as Chairman of HP Inc.’s board of directors and HP Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer, alleged violations of the FCPA, and HP Inc.’s acquisition of 3PAR Inc. and Autonomy Corporation plc (“Autonomy”). On February 25, 2014, the court issued an order granting HP Inc.’s administrative motion to relate Xxxxxxxx II to Xxxxxxxx I. On April 8, 2014, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to stay the action pending resolution of Xxxxxxxx I by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.