Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process Sample Clauses

Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Upon completion, exams are scored automatically and a score report will be emailed 36 hours from the time that the Exam was completed. The Linux Foundation and/or the Exam Proctoring Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest that your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (measurement error). The Linux Foundation will use statistical analyses of exam data (“Data Forensics”) to identify patterns indicative of test fraud including cheating and piracy. The Linux Foundation reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and certification result if review of your exam record reveals scoring inaccuracies (attributable to The Linux Foundation or the Exam Proctoring Partner) or response patterns indicative of possible misconduct or measurement error. If The Linux Foundation determines that an Exam score is invalid due to issues that are beyond the control of the candidate, the candidate will be advised of options to retake the Exam at no charge.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Upon completion, exams are scored automatically and a score report will be made available within 3 business days. LF and/or the Exam Proctoring Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest that your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (measurement error). LF will use statistical analyses of exam data (“Data Forensics”) to identify patterns indicative of test fraud including cheating and piracy. LF reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and certification result if review of your exam record reveals scoring inaccuracies (attributable to LF or the Exam Proctoring Partner) or response patterns indicative of possible misconduct or measurement error. If LF determines that an Exam score is invalid due to issues that are beyond the control of the candidate, the candidate will be advised of options to retake the Exam at no charge.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Following completion of your exam, you will be provided a Preliminary Score Report indicating an exam score which will be reviewed, along with other information in your exam record, before an official score is issued. You may view your official exam score at xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxxxxxx within 72 hours of your exam appointment. Cisco and/or the Testing Delivery Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns which may suggest that your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (measurement error). Cisco reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and certification result if review of your exam record reveals scoring inaccuracies (attributable to Cisco or the Testing Delivery Partner) or response patterns indicative of possible misconduct or measurement error. If Cisco determines that your exam score is invalid, you will be advised of options for retaking the examination.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Upon completion, exams are scored automatically and a score report will be made available within 3 business days. OSF and/or the Exam Proctoring Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest that your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (measurement error). OSF will use statistical analyses of exam data (“Data Forensics”) to identify patterns indicative of test fraud including cheating and piracy. OSF reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and certification result if review of your exam record reveals scoring inaccuracies (attributable to OSF or the Exam Proctoring Partner) or response patterns indicative of possible misconduct or measurement error. If OSF determines that an Exam score is invalid due to issues that are beyond the control of the candidate, the candidate will be advised of options to retake the Exam at no charge.
Sample 1Sample 2
Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Upon completion, exams are scored automatically and a score report will be made available within 3 business days. An Exam Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest that your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (measurement error). OpenStack and Exam Partners will use statistical analyses of exam data (“Data Forensics”) to identify patterns indicative of test fraud including cheating and piracy. OpenStack reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and certification result if review of your exam record reveals scoring inaccuracies (attributable to OpenStack or the Exam Proctoring Partner) or response patterns indicative of possible misconduct or measurement error. If OpenStack or an Exam Partner determines that an Exam score is invalid due to issues that are beyond the control of the candidate, the candidate will be advised of options to retake the Exam at no charge.
Sample 1
Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Following completion of your exam, you may be provided with a preliminary score report indicating an exam score; however, this is not your official score. You may view your official exam score at xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxxxxxx. Due to the various levels of difficulty and complexity of exams, official exam scores may take time to post after your exam appointment. Cisco and/or the Testing Delivery Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (“Measurement Error”). Cisco reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and Certification result, even after your official exam score has been posted on such website if the review of your exam record reveals (i) scoring inaccuracies (attributable to Cisco or to the Testing Delivery Partner) or (ii) response patterns indicative of possible misconduct on your part or (iii) response patterns indicative of possible Measurement Error(s). If Cisco determines that your exam score is invalid due to scoring errors or Measurement Error(s), you will be advised of options for retaking the examination. If Cisco determines that your exam score is invalid due to possible misconduct on your part, Cisco reserves the right to invalidate your score and consider your actions in violation of Exhibit 1 to this Agreement.
Sample 1

Related to Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum. b. The intending bidder or the Purchaser is responsible at own costs and expenses to make and shall be deemed to have carried out own search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification on all liabilities and encumbrances affecting the Property, the title particulars as well as the accuracy and correctness of the particulars and information provided. c. The Purchaser shall be deemed to purchase the Property in all respects subject thereto and shall also be deemed to have full knowledge of the state and condition of the Property regardless of whether or not the said search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification have been conducted. d. The Purchaser shall be deemed to have read, understood and accepted these Conditions of Sale prior to the auction and to have knowledge of all matters which would have been disclosed thereby and the Purchaser expressly warrants to the Assignee that the Purchaser has sought independent legal advice on all matters pertaining to this sale and has been advised by his/her/its independent legal advisor of the effect of all the Conditions of Sale. e. Neither the Assignee nor the Auctioneer shall be required or bound to inform the Purchaser of any such matters whether known to them or not and the Purchaser shall raise no enquiry, requisition or objection thereon or thereto.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment and Prior Consultation Processor shall provide reasonable assistance to the Company with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with Supervising Authorities or other competent data privacy authorities, which Company reasonably considers to be required by article 35 or 36 of the GDPR or equivalent provisions of any other Data Protection Law, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Company Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, the Contracted Processors.

  • Evaluation Process ‌ A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of their review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory. B. The supervisor will discuss the evaluation with the employee. The employee will have the opportunity to provide feedback on the evaluation. The discussion may include such topics as: 1. Reviewing the employee’s performance; 2. Identifying ways the employee may improve their performance; 3. Updating the employee’s position description, if necessary; 4. Identifying performance goals and expectations for the next appraisal period; and 5. Identifying employee training and development needs. C. The performance evaluation process will include, but not be limited to, a written performance evaluation on forms used by the Employer, the employee’s signature acknowledging receipt of the forms, and any comments by the employee. A copy of the performance evaluation will be provided to the employee at the time of the review. A copy of the final performance evaluation, including any employee or reviewer comments, will be provided to the employee. The original performance evaluation forms, including the employee’s comments, will be maintained in the employee’s personnel file. D. If an employee disagrees with their performance evaluation, the employee has the right to attach a rebuttal. E. The performance evaluation process is subject to the grievance procedure in Article 30. The specific content of a performance evaluation is not subject to the grievance procedure. F. Performance evaluations will not be used to initiate personnel actions such as transfer, promotion, or discipline.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!