ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS AND LOOPS STUCK-ON CALLS Sample Clauses

ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS AND LOOPS STUCK-ON CALLS. In the modified setup, some of the calls generated by Radar 2–Lane 1 had a very short duration (less than 1 second), compared with the actual duration of a vehicle in the crossing (on the order of 3 seconds). Although this condition does not constitute a detection error, it is worth mentioning because the actual presence of a vehicle in the crossing is not always reflected in some of the calls generated by Radar 2 in Lane 1. • The duration of false calls varied depending on the situation that generated them. False calls caused by moving gates were shorter, ranging between 0.2 and 11.8 seconds, compared with false calls created without any object moving in the crossing, which lasted between 0.2 and 20.1 seconds. A distribution of the duration of the false calls by type is shown in Table 5 and Figure 4. • In the time frame covered for the evaluation of the initial and modified setups, it was found that for some period in 2 days, the loop detectors placed constant calls for extended periods. These 2 days are not included in the initial or modified setup analyses shown above, given that comparisons between loops and radar units could not be performed. One of these days was November 28, 2012, when the loops placed a constant call between 1300 and 1900 hours (GMT – 0), time during which railroad workers could be seen sporadically in the video images. The second day this situation was found was January 15, 2013, when the loops placed a constant call from 1430 hours until the end of the day (2400 hours, GMT – 0). Railroad workers were not noticed in the video images on January 15, 2013. Xxxxxxxx calls by the vehicle-detection system controlling the exit gates prevent these gates from being lowered before train arrivals, raising a safety concern at the crossing. Table 5. Distribution of False Call Duration (not including bicycles or pedestrians) False Call Duration in seconds (Less than) Radar 1 Lane 1 Radar 2 Lane 1 Radar 1 Lane 2 Radar 2 Lane 2 Total No Object Gates moving up Xxxxx moving down No Object Gates moving up Gates moving down No Object Gates moving up Gates moving down No Object Gates moving up Gates moving down 2.5 4 0 0 2 1 26 1 0 0 3 0 0 37 Total 28 0 0 12 71 168 3 1 0 20 3 0 306 80 70 60 50 40 Radar 2 Lane 2 Gates moving down Radar 2 Lane 2 Gates moving up Radar 2 Lane 2 No Object Radar 2 Lane 1 Gates moving down Radar 2 Lane 1 Gates moving up Radar 2 Lane 1 No Object Radar 1 Lane 2 Gates moving down Radar 1 Lane 2 Gates moving up Radar 1 Lane 2 No...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS AND LOOPS STUCK-ON CALLS

  • Prohibition Against Selecting and Installing Products Containing Hazardous Materials The Contractor shall not select, install or otherwise incorporate any products or materials containing Hazardous Materials within the boundaries of the Site. Should the Contractor or any Subcontractors have knowledge that, or believe that, an item, component, material, substance, or accessory within a product or assembly selected by the Contractor or any Subcontractor may contain Hazardous Materials it is the Contractor’s responsibility to secure a written certification from the manufacturer of any suspected material which identifies the specific Hazardous Material(s) contained, together with the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for such materials which shall be submitted to the Owner and Design Professional.

  • Terminating Switched Access Detail Usage Data A category 1101XX record as defined in the EMI Telcordia Practice BR-010-200- 010.

  • COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in the Summary Schedule (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2020-21, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2022-23 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2022, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments.

  • Principal Cooperator Contacts Cooperator Program Contact Cooperator Administrative Contact Name: Xxxx Xxxxxxx, Executive Director Address: 000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxx, Xxxxx, Xxx: Xxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: 000-000-0000 FAX: 000-000-0000 Email: xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Name: Xxxxxx X’Xxxxx-Xxxxxx, Policy Director Address: 000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xxxx, Xxxxx, Xxx: Xxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: 000-000-0000 FAX: 000-000-0000 Email: xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Principal U.S. Forest Service Contacts: U.S. Forest Service Program Manager Contact U.S. Forest Service Administrative Contact Name: Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Trails & CDA Address: 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx, XX Mailstop 1125 City, State, Zip: Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: 000-000-0000 FAX: 000-000-0000 Email: xxxxxx@xx.xxx.xx Name: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Dispersed Rec Address: 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx, XX Mailstop 1125 City, State, Zip: Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: 000-000-0000 FAX: 000-000-0000 Email: xxxxxxxx@xx.xxx.xx

  • RELEASE OF BID EVALUATION MATERIALS Requests concerning the evaluation of Bids may be submitted under the Freedom of Information Law. Information, other than statistical or factual tabulations or data such as the Bid Tabulation, shall only be released as required by law after Contract award. Bid Tabulations are not maintained for all procurements. Names of Bidders may be disclosed after Bid opening upon request. Written requests should be directed to the Commissioner.

  • Use of Interconnection Facilities by Third Parties 6551 Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.9.9.1 Purpose of Interconnection Facilities. 6551

  • Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transactions (a) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency.

  • Originating Switched Access Detail Usage Data A category 1101XX record as defined in the EMI Telcordia Practice BR-010-200- 010.

  • Contractor Sensitive Information 17.1 The Authority must:

  • DOES THE SPR NEED TO BE UPDATED IF INFORMATION CHANGES Yes. It remains a continuing obligation of the principal or his/her authorized agent to update the SPR whenever any of the information provided on the initial form changes. WHERE DO THE SPR AND ANY UPDATES NEED TO BE FILED? The SPR needs to be filed with the County Department or County Division processing the application or matter. If and when an additional expenditure is incurred subsequent to the initial filing of the SPR, an amended SPR needs to be filed with the County Department or County Division where the original application, including the initial SPR, was filed. WHEN DO THE SPR AND ANY UPDATES NEED TO BE FILED? In most cases, the initial SPR needs to be filed with the other application forms. The SPR and any update must be filed with the appropriate County Department or County Division not less than seven (7) days prior to the BCC hearing date so that they may be incorporated into the BCC agenda packet. (See Section 2-354(b), Orange County Code.) When the matter is a discussion agenda item or is the subject of a public hearing, and any additional expenditure occurs less than 7 days prior to BCC meeting date or updated information is not included in the BCC agenda packet, the principal or his/her authorized agent is obligated to verbally present the updated information to the BCC when the agenda item is heard or the public hearing is held. When the matter is a consent agenda item and an update has not been made at least 7 days prior to the BCC meeting or the update is not included in the BCC agenda packet, the item will be pulled from the consent agenda to be considered at a future meeting.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.