Security Classif Sample Clauses

Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 113 22. Price Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized This page intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many representatives from the Seattle/LWC Urban partnership agencies as well as the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration regional offices provided much appreciated support to the national evaluation team’s efforts to develop this plan. The efforts of the following individuals were particularly instrumental in collecting the technical information needed to develop the evaluation plan and their assistance is recognized and appreciated: Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx and Xxx Xxxxxxx, Washington State Department of Transportation; Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx and Xxxx Xxxxx, Xxxx County; Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Puget Sound Regional Council; and Xxxx XxXxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxxx of Xxxxxx Engineering (consultant to Washington State Department of Transportation). TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii Background vii The Seattle/LWC UPA viii Evaluation Analyses and Test Plans ix Next Steps xii
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Security Classif. (of this report) 20. SECURITY CLASSIF. (of this page) 21. NO. OF PAGES 22.
Sample 1
Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified 20. Security Classif. (of this page)Unclassified 21. No. of Pages 16 22. Price Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND DISCLAIMER This publication is based on the results of ICT-R27-95, Field Evaluation of Smart Sensor Vehicle Detectors at Intersections and Railroad Crossings. ICT-R27-95 was conducted in cooperation with the Illinois Center for Transportation; the Illinois Department of Transportation; the Illinois Commerce Commission; and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Members of the Technical Review Panel are the following: Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, IDOT (Chair) Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, ICC (Co-chair) Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx, IDOT Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, IDOT Xxxxxxx Xxxx, IDOT Xxxxx Xxxxx, IDOT Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, IDOT Xxxx Xxxxxxx, FHWA The contents of this report reflect the view of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Illinois Center for Transportation, the Illinois Department of Transportation, or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trademark or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of this document and do not constitute an endorsement of product by the Federal Highway Administration, the Illinois Department of Transportation, or the Illinois Center for Transportation.
Sample 1
Security Classif. (of this report) Un-classified 20. Security Classif. (of this page) Un-classified 21. No. of Pages 59 22. Price Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized Table of Contents
Sample 1
Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 92 22. Price Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized This page intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many individuals from the San Francisco partnership were helpful during the course of development of the evaluation plan. The following individuals were particularly instrumental in providing information and insight and their contribution is both recognized and appreciated: Xxx Xxxxxx of the San Francisco Metropolitan Transportation Authority; Xxxxxxx Xxxx and Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx of the San Francisco County Transportation Agency; and Xxxxxx Xxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxx of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii Background vii The San Francisco UPA vii Evaluation Analyses and Test Plans x Next Steps xii
Sample 1

Related to Security Classif

  • Alternative Clearing System References in this Agreement to Euroclear and/or Clearstream, Luxembourg shall, wherever the context so permits, be deemed to include reference to any additional or alternative clearing system approved by the Issuer, the Guarantor, the Registrar and the Issuing and Principal Paying Agent.

  • Higher Classification (a) In the event a classification review results in a position being reclassified at a higher level, the employee presently filling the position shall, if qualified, be assigned to the position at the higher level at a rate of pay which is equal to or higher than his or her current rate of pay.

  • Position Classification 1. The requirements of each position will be documented by a Position Description developed by reference to the Position Description Questionnaire (PDQ), and classified into a salary grade consistent with the Position Description and classifications for corresponding job duties found throughout the USNH System and according to USNH policy and processed by the KSC Office of Human Resources.

  • Class Mail When mailed first class to the last address of the recipient known to the party giving notice, notice is effective three mail delivery days after deposit in a United States Postal Service office or mailbox.

  • Eligible Items You agree to scan and deposit only checks, as that term is defined in Federal Reserve Regulation CC (“Reg. CC”). You agree that the image of the check transmitted to us shall be deemed an “item” within the meaning of Article 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in Tennessee. You agree that you will not use RDC to scan and deposit any of the following checks or other items:

  • Job Classification When a new classification (which is covered by the terms of this Collective Agreement) is established by the Hospital, the Hospital shall determine the rate of pay for such new classification and notify the local Union of the same. If the local Union challenges the rate, it shall have the right to request a meeting with the Hospital to endeavour to negotiate a mutually satisfactory rate. Such request will be made within ten (10) days after the receipt of notice from the Hospital of such new occupational classification and rate. Any change mutually agreed to resulting from such meeting shall be retroactive to the date that notice of the new rate was given by the Hospital. If the parties are unable to agree, the dispute concerning the new rate may be submitted to arbitration as provided in the Agreement within fifteen (15) days of such meeting. The decision of the Board of Arbitration (or arbitrator as the case may be) shall be based on the relationship established by comparison with the rates for other classifications in the bargaining unit having regard to the requirements of such classification. When the Hospital makes a substantial change in the job content of an existing classification which in reality causes such classification to become a new classification, the Hospital agrees to meet with the Union if requested to permit the Union to make representation with respect to the appropriate rate of pay. If the matter is not resolved following the meeting with the Union the matter may be referred to Arbitration as provided in the Agreement within fifteen (15) days of such meeting. The decision of the Board of Arbitration (or arbitrator as the case may be) shall be based on the relationship established by comparison with the rates for other classifications in the bargaining unit having regard to the requirements of such classifications. The parties further agree that any change mutually agreed to or awarded as a result of arbitration shall be retroactive only to the date that the Union raised the issue with the Hospital. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if as a result of compensable illness or injury covered by WSIB an employee is unable to carry out the regular functions of her position, the Hospital may, subject to its operational requirements, establish a special classification and salary in an endeavour to provide the employee with an opportunity of continued employment. This provision shall not be construed as a guarantee that such special classification(s) will be made available or continued.

  • FURNITURE CLASSIFICATIONS Furniture classifications include but not limited to: Cafeteria, Dormitory, Library Shelving and Library Related, Lounge, Systems (Modular), School (Classroom), Freestanding, Seating, Filing Systems and Equipment, and Technology Support.

  • SPECIALIZED JOB CLASSES Where there is a particular specialized job class in which the pay rate is below the local market value assessment of that job class, the parties may use existing means under the collective agreement to adjust compensation for that job class.

  • New Classification Should a new position or new classification be created within the Bargaining Unit during the term of this Agreement, the Employer and the Union will decide the rate of pay. Nothing herein prevents the Employer from filling such positions and having Nurses working in such positions during such negotiations. The salary when determined will be retroactive to the date on which the successful candidate commenced work in that classification.

  • JOB CLASSIFICATIONS For the purpose of this Agreement the following classifications will be applicable:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.