Agency Coordination. The Consultant shall coordinate the environmental permitting effort with the Orange County Project Manager and Public Works Environmental Project Manager. The Consultant shall notify the County Project Manager and Orange County Public Works Environmental Project Manager of all meetings with regulatory agencies to coordinate attendance by County staff. The Consultant shall submit meeting minutes and provide copies of all permit-related correspondence. In addition, the Consultant shall coordinate with County staff including but not limited to the Orange County Environmental Protection Division for any information, which may be relevant to the project design. This coordination shall take place prior to any regulatory meetings.
Agency Coordination. Should other federal agencies be involved in ESHPF Grant-funded activities, that federal agency may designate the NPS as the Lead Agency for the purposes of Section 106 reviews for these named storms. NPS, as lead, will coordinate the Section 106 review activities of all Federal agencies and Tribes that participate in undertakings funded by ESHPF. The federal agency may fulfill its Section 106 responsibilities by stating in writing that it concurs with the terms of this Agreement as it relates to the project(s) at issue, and notifying the Signatories that it intends to join this Agreement, and will adhere to the terms of this Agreement. Any necessary amendments will be considered in accordance with Stipulation VI(D) of this Agreement.
Agency Coordination. A. Because of both singular and overlapping legal authorities and purviews among the Signatories regarding individual Undertaking components or activities, any or all of these agencies may be responsible to carry out the terms of this PA for a given Undertaking component or activity. That agency or agencies that has/have purview over a given Undertaking component or activity is referred to in this PA as the “responsible agency(ies),” hereinafter.
B. To promote coordination among the agencies and to expedite the conduct of tasks pursuant to this PA, the responsible agency(ies) can make informal arrangements among themselves regarding the implementation of this PA so long as the substance of this PA is followed. If an agency that is party to this PA is designated as the lead for a specific task under the terms of the PA, all parties to this PA shall be notified by USACE of this arrangement. However, if there is more than one agency with purview over a given Undertaking component or activity, all involved agencies shall cooperate and keep each other aware of the substance, progress, and any problems with implementing this PA for that Undertaking component or activity and remain involved to prevent and resolve problems.
C. The Signatories shall enforce the terms of this PA, approvals, and other conditions that incorporate this PA and its terms. Each shall notify the others if any of them becomes aware of an instance of possible non-compliance with the terms and conditions of this PA or permit or conditions as they relate to this PA. In such case, the responsible agency(ies) shall ensure compliance consistent with its/their legal authorities and consult with the other agencies, as needed.
D. Consultation shall be an ongoing process throughout the construction phase of the Undertaking. The parties to this PA may consult at any time in writing, including e-mail, or telephone.
Agency Coordination. A. Provide a synopsis of coordination with Federal, tribal, state and local environmental, regulatory and resource agencies. Describe their level of participation and how you coordinated with them.
B. What transportation agencies (e.g. for adjacent jurisdictions) did you coordinate with or were involved during the PEL study?
C. What steps will need to be taken with each agency during NEPA scoping?
Agency Coordination. A. When NPS is determined to be the Lead Agency for the purposes of Section 106 activities for these named storms, NPS will coordinate the Section 106 review activities of all Federal agencies and Tribes that participate in undertakings funded by ESHPF.
B. Projects reviewed and commented upon by the SHPO prior to the NPS ESHPF funding and done in accordance with 54 U.S.C. § 302303, which describes the role of the SHPO, and commented upon as per 36 CFR Part 800, may proceed without additional review, provided the scope of work remains the same. The SHPO may retain a copy of the previous correspondence regarding the undertaking in the ESHPF project file to prove compliance with NHPA.
C. Where ESHPF funding occurs prior to the effective date of this PA, work will proceed under the Section 106 process, as outlined in 36 CFR Part 800, with NPS acting as lead and SHPOs supplying information to NPS for review via the Environmental Worksheet.
D. When projects involve National Historic Landmarks, a Project Notification should be supplied to NPS to allow review and adherence to Section 110(f).
Agency Coordination. Effective upon execution of this Agreement, (Installation Name) agrees to implement the following agency notification and concurrence procedures:
a. Except under circumstances reasonably determined by the (Installation Name) to be an emergency, the (Installation Name) shall provide at least sixty (60) days notice prior to implementation of any Land Use Change (as defined in Section VII.d.) at any Site subject to LUCs. The (Installation Name) will provide notification of any such change to U.S. EPA and Illinois EPA. Such notification must be provided for the purpose of obtaining either U.S. EPA or Illinois EPA concurrence (whichever shall have program authority over the affected Site(s)) with the (Installation Name) determination as to whether the contemplated change will or will not necessitate the need for re-evaluation of the selected remedy or implementation of specific measures to ensure continued protection of human health and the environment.
b. Except in the case of an emergency where (Installation Name) personnel reasonably believe it is not practicable to wait for U.S. EPA or Illinois EPA concurrence, no Land Use Change should be implemented until U.S. EPA or Illinois EPA concurrence is obtained, consistent with the timeliness requirements set forth in subparagraph (c) below. For Land Use Change(s) affecting LUST or RCRA closure or corrective action Sites over which the State has program authority, although such notifications will be sent to both U.S. EPA and Illinois EPA, the (Installation Name) need only obtain Illinois EPA's concurrence with the proposed change. Each notification or request for concurrence must include:
1. An evaluation of whether the anticipated Land Use Change will pose unacceptable risks to human health and the environment or negatively impact the effectiveness of the selected Site remedy;
2. An evaluation of the need for any additional remedial action or LUCs resulting from implementation of the anticipated Land Use Change; and,
3. A proposal for any necessary changes in the selected Site remedy.
c. Upon being notified by (Installation Name) of an anticipated Land Use Change at a Site, U.S. EPA or Illinois EPA or both shall evaluate the information provided pursuant to paragraph (b) above, and respond in a timely fashion prior to such land use change.
d. The Parties agree that any of the following will constitute a Land Use Change:
1. Any change in land use (e.g. from industrial to residential) inconsistent with any land us...
Agency Coordination. Provide the appropriate staff as part of the coordination efforts between the Authority and Agencies, as directed by the Authority.
Agency Coordination. The Agency Representative coordinating the work of this contractor will be: (NAME) (TITLE) (TELEPHONE #) Mail approved contract to: Agency agrees to make available advice, counsel, data, and personnel, etc. as described immediately below or in Attachment number to this agreement.
Agency Coordination. Xxxxxxx will coordinate with the following agency stakeholders during the project. Ms. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx May 11, 2010
x. XxXxxxx County Division of Transportation –Xxxxxxx assumes a status meeting will be held at the County’s offices. Assume 1 meeting.
ii. XXXX – Xxxxxxx will attend a kickoff meeting with XXXXX and IDOT at IDOT District One. Assume 1
Agency Coordination a. Permits It is anticipated that the wetlands will be considered jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and therefore require both a USACE Section 404 permit and a XxXxxxx County Watershed Development Ordinance permit. The XxXxxxx County ADID maps have determined that the Kishwaukee River is a “High Quality Aquatic Resource” in the vicinity of the bridge. AECOM will prepare a letter of Jurisdictional Determination for the County to submit to the USACE. This will inform that agency of the upcoming project and provide awareness of bridge replacement.
b. ADID Coordination AECOM will coordinate with XxXxxxx County and/or the USACE to identify the functions being performed by the ADID wetlands identified associated with the Kishwaukee River. The Kishwaukee River has been included in the XxXxxxx County ADID wetland study as having a high habitat value. This determination could have been made based on its biological/habitat functions, the aquatic habitat it provides, its shoreline/streambank stabilization functions, sediment/toxicant retention ability, nutrient removal/ transformation ability, and/or its stormwater storage/hydrologic stabilization function. The basis for the ADID determination will influence the type of permit necessary from XxXxxxx County and the mitigation necessary for wetland impacts.
c. Threatened and Endangered Species/INAI Coordination AECOM will coordinate with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the potential for the presence of protected species to be present in the project vicinity. Coordination will be done with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for compliance with the Endangered Species Act and with IDNR for compliance with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources Endangered Species Consultation Program and the Illinois Natural Areas Preservation Act compliance. The IDNR web-based Ecological Compliance Assessment Tool (EcoCAT) indicates that there is no threatened or endangered species present at the project site. However the site is listed on the Illinois Natural Areas Index. Heightened communication with the IDNR will be necessary.
d. Items not to be performed by AECOM under this scope of work.
