Common use of Applications for Payment Clause in Contracts

Applications for Payment. Based on Engineer’s observations as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of Applications for Payment and accompanying supporting documentation: a) Determine the amounts that Engineer recommends Contractor be paid. Recommend reductions in payment (set-offs) based on the provisions for set- offs stated in the Construction Contract. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, that, to the best of Engineer’s knowledge, information and belief, Contractor’s Work has progressed to the point indicated, the Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractor’s being entitled to such payment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is Engineer’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, Engineer’s recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) By recommending payment, Engineer shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations made by Engineer to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s Work as it is performed and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer in this Agreement.

Applications for Payment. Based on Engineer’s observations as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of Applications for Payment and accompanying supporting documentation: a) a. Determine the amounts that Engineer recommends Contractor be paid. Recommend reductions in payment (set-offs) based on the provisions for set- set-offs stated in the Construction Contract. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, that, to the best of Engineer’s knowledge, information and belief, Contractor’s Work has progressed to the point indicated, the Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractor’s being entitled to such payment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is Engineer’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, Engineer’s recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) b. By recommending payment, Engineer shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations made by Engineer to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s Work as it is performed and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer in this Agreement. Neither Engineer’s review of Contractor’s Work for the purposes of recommending payments nor Engineer’s recommendation of any payment including final payment will impose on Engineer responsibility to supervise, direct, or control the Work, or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto, or Contractor’s compliance with Laws and Regulations applicable to Contractor’s furnishing and performing the Work. It will also not impose responsibility on Engineer to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes Contractor has used the money paid to Contractor by Owner; to determine that title to any portion of the Work, including materials or equipment, has passed to Owner free and clear of any liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there may not be other matters at issue between Owner and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid.

Applications for Payment. Based on EngineerJ-U-B’s on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional professional, and on upon written request of CLIENT, review of Applications for Payment and the accompanying supporting No documentation: a) Determine . Assist CLIENT in determining the amounts owed to contractor and, if requested by CLIENT, recommend in writing to CLIENT that Engineer recommends Contractor payments be paid. Recommend reductions made to contractor in payment (set-offs) based on the provisions for set- offs stated in the Construction Contractsuch amounts. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s a representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, CLIENT that, to the best of EngineerJ-U-B’s knowledge, information information, and belief, Contractor’s the Work has progressed to the point indicated, the quality of such Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, and subject to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and Documents or to any other qualifications qualification stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractorcontractor’s being entitled to such payment payments appear to have been fulfilled in so far insofar as it is EngineerJ-U-B’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, EngineerJ-U-B’s recommendations recommendation of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) . By recommending paymentany payment and after reasonable inquiry, Engineer J-U-B shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations exhaustive, continuous, or detailed reviews or examinations have been made by Engineer J-U-B to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s the Work as it is performed furnished and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work provided beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer J-U-B in this AgreementAgreement and the Contract Documents. J-U-B’s review of the Work for the purposes of recommending payments will not impose on J-U-B the responsibility to supervise, direct, or control such Work, or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto, or contractor’s compliance with laws and regulations applicable to its furnishing and performing the Work. J-U-B’s review will also not impose responsibility on J-U-B to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes contractor has used monies paid to contractor by CLIENT; to determine that title to any of the Work, including materials or equipment, has passed to CLIENT free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there may not be other matters at issue between CLIENT and contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid.

Applications for Payment. Based on Engineer’s observations as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of Applications for Payment and accompanying supporting documentation: a) i. Determine the amounts that Engineer recommends Contractor be paid. Recommend reductions in payment (set-offs) based on the provisions for set- offs stated in the Construction Contract. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, that, to the best of Engineer’s knowledge, information and belief, Contractor’s Work has progressed to the point indicated, the Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractor’s being entitled to such payment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is Engineer’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, Engineer’s recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) ii. By recommending payment, Engineer shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations made by Engineer to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s Work as it is performed and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer in this Agreement. Neither Engineer’s review of Contractor’s Work for the purposes of recommending payments nor Engineer’s recommendation of any payment including final payment will impose on Engineer responsibility to supervise, direct, or control the Work, or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto, or Contractor’s compliance with Laws and Regulations applicable to Contractor’s furnishing and performing the Work. It will also not impose responsibility on Engineer to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes Contractor has used the money paid to Contractor by Owner; to determine that title to any portion of the Work, including materials or equipment, has passed to Owner free and clear of any liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there may not be other matters at issue between Owner and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid.

Applications for Payment. Based on Engineer’s observations as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of Applications for Payment and accompanying supporting documentation: a) Determine the amounts that Engineer recommends Contractor be paid. Recommend reductions in payment (set-offsset‐offs) based on the provisions for set- set‐ offs stated in the Construction Contract. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, that, to the best of Engineer’s knowledge, information and belief, Contractor’s Work has progressed to the point indicated, the Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractor’s being entitled to such payment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is Engineer’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, Engineer’s recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) By recommending payment, Engineer shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations made by Engineer to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s Work as it is performed and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer in this Agreement.

Applications for Payment. Based on Engineer’s observations as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of Applications for Payment and accompanying supporting documentation: a) a. Determine the amounts that Engineer recommends Contractor be paid. Recommend reductions in payment (set-offs) based on the provisions for set- set-offs stated in the Construction Contract. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, that, to the best of Engineer’s knowledge, information and belief, Contractor’s Work has progressed to the point indicated, the Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractor’s being entitled to such payment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is Engineer’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Workwork, Engineer’s recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) b. By recommending payment, Engineer shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations made by Engineer to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s Work as it is performed and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer in the Agreement or this AgreementTask Order. Neither Engineer’s review of Contractor’s Work for the purposes of recommending payments nor Engineer’s recommendation of any payment including final payment will impose on Engineer responsibility to supervise, direct, or control the Work, or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto, or Contractor’s compliance with Laws and Regulations applicable to Contractor’s furnishing and performing the Work. It will also not impose responsibility on Engineer to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes Contractor has used the money paid to Contractor by Owner; to determine that title to any portion of the Work, including materials or equipment, has passed to Owner free and clear of any liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there may not be other matters at issue between Owner and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid.

Applications for Payment. Based on Engineer’s observations as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of Applications for Payment and accompanying supporting documentation: a) : Determine the amounts that Engineer recommends Contractor be paid. Recommend reductions in payment (set-offs) based on the provisions for set- set-offs stated in the Construction Contract. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, that, to the best of Engineer’s knowledge, information and belief, Contractor’s Work has progressed to the point indicated, the Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractor’s being entitled to such payment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is Engineer’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, Engineer’s recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) . By recommending payment, Engineer shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations made by Engineer to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s Work as it is performed and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer in this Agreement. Neither Engineer’s review of Contractor’s Work for the purposes of recommending payments nor Engineer’s recommendation of any payment including final payment will impose on Engineer responsibility to supervise, direct, or control the Work, or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto, or Contractor’s compliance with Laws and Regulations applicable to Contractor’s furnishing and performing the Work. It will also not impose responsibility on Engineer to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes Contractor has used the money paid to Contractor by Owner; to determine that title to any portion of the Work, including materials or equipment, has passed to Owner free and clear of any liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there may not be other matters at issue between Owner and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid.

Applications for Payment. Based on Engineer’s observations as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of Applications for Payment and accompanying supporting documentation: a) a. Determine the amounts that Engineer recommends Contractor be paid. Recommend reductions in payment (set-offsset‐offs) based on the provisions for set- offs set‐offs stated in the Construction Contract. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, that, to the best of Engineer’s knowledge, information and belief, Contractor’s Work has progressed to the point indicated, the Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractor’s being entitled to such payment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is Engineer’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, Engineer’s recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) b. By recommending payment, Engineer shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations made by Engineer to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s Work as it is performed and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer in this Agreement. Neither Engineer’s review of Contractor’s Work for the purposes of recommending payments nor Engineer’s recommendation of any payment including final payment will impose on Engineer responsibility to supervise, direct, or control the Work, or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto, or Contractor’s compliance with Laws and Regulations applicable to Contractor’s furnishing and performing the Work. It will also not impose responsibility on Engineer to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes Contractor has used the money paid to Contractor by Owner; to determine that title to any portion of the Work, including materials or equipment, has passed to Owner free and clear of any liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there may not be other matters at issue between Owner and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid.

Applications for Payment. Based on Engineer’s observations as an experienced and a qualified design professional and on review of Applications for Payment and accompanying supporting documentation: a) ; Determine the amounts that Engineer recommends Contractor be paid. Recommend reductions in payment (set-offs) based on the provisions for set- set-offs stated in the Construction Contract. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s representation to OwnerTown, based on such observations and review, that, to the best of Engineer’s knowledge, information and belief, Contractor’s Work has progressed to the point indicated, the Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendationthere commendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractor’s being entitled to such payment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is Engineer’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, Engineer’s recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) . By recommending payment, Engineer shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations made by Engineer to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s Work as it is performed and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer in this Agreement. Neither Engineer’s review of Contractor’s Work for the purposes of recommending payments nor Engineer’s recommendation of any payment including final payment will impose on Engineer responsibility to supervise, direct, or control the Work, or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto, or Contractor’s compliance with Laws and Regulations applicable to Contractor’s furnishing and performing the Work. It will also not impose responsibility on Engineer to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes Contractor has used the money paid to Contractor by Town; to determine that title to any portion of the Work, including materials or equipment, has passed to Town free and clear of any liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there may not be other matters at issue between Town and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid.

Applications for Payment. Based on EngineerJ-U-B’s on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional professional, and on upon written request of CLIENT, review of Applications for Payment and the accompanying No supporting documentation: a) Determine . Assist CLIENT in determining the amounts owed to contractor and, if requested by CLIENT, recommend in writing to CLIENT that Engineer recommends Contractor payments be paid. Recommend reductions made to contractor in payment (set-offs) based on the provisions for set- offs stated in the Construction Contractsuch amounts. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s a representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, CLIENT that, to the best of EngineerJ-U-B’s knowledge, information information, and belief, Contractor’s the Work has progressed to the point indicated, the quality of such Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, and subject to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and Documents or to any other qualifications qualification stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractorcontractor’s being entitled to such payment payments appear to have been fulfilled in so far insofar as it is EngineerJ-U-B’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, EngineerJ-U-B’s recommendations recommendation of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) . By recommending paymentany payment and after reasonable inquiry, Engineer J-U-B shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations exhaustive, continuous, or detailed reviews or examinations have been made by Engineer J-U-B to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s the Work as it is performed furnished and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work provided beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer J-U-B in this AgreementAgreement and the Contract Documents. J-U-B’s review of the Work for the purposes of recommending payments will not impose on J-U-B the responsibility to supervise, direct, or control such Work, or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto, or contractor’s compliance with laws and regulations applicable to its furnishing and performing the Work. J-U-B’s review will also not impose responsibility on J-U-B to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes contractor has used monies paid to contractor by CLIENT; to determine that title to any of the Work, including materials or equipment, has passed to CLIENT free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there may not be other matters at issue between CLIENT and contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid.

Applications for Payment. Based on EngineerJ-U-B’s on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional professional, and on upon written request of CLIENT, review of Applications for Payment and the accompanying supporting documentation: a) Determine . Assist CLIENT in determining the amounts owed to contractor and, if requested by CLIENT, recommend in writing to CLIENT that Engineer recommends Contractor payments be paid. Recommend reductions made to contractor in payment (set-offs) based on the provisions for set- offs stated in the Construction Contractsuch amounts. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s a representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, CLIENT that, to the best of EngineerJ-U-B’s knowledge, information information, and belief, Contractor’s the Work has progressed to the point indicated, the quality of such Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, and subject to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and Documents or to any other qualifications qualification stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractorcontractor’s being entitled to such payment payments appear to have been fulfilled in so far insofar as it is EngineerJ-U-B’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, EngineerJ-U-B’s recommendations recommendation of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b) . By recommending paymentany payment and after reasonable inquiry, Engineer J-U-B shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations exhaustive, continuous, or detailed reviews or examinations have been made by Engineer J-U-B to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s the Work as it is performed furnished and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work provided beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer J-U-B in this Agreement.Agreement and the Contract Documents. J-U-B’s review of the Work for the purposes of recommending payments will not impose on J-U-B the responsibility to supervise, direct, or control such Work, or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto, or contractor’s compliance with laws and regulations applicable to its furnishing and performing the Work. J-U-B’s review will also not impose responsibility on J-U-B to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes contractor has used monies paid to contractor by CLIENT; to determine that title to any of the Work, including materials or equipment, has passed to CLIENT free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there may not be other matters at issue between CLIENT and contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid. No