Common use of Artifacts and Evidence Clause in Contracts

Artifacts and Evidence. a. The evaluator will collect and share artifacts and evidence necessary to complete the evaluation. b. The teacher may provide additional artifacts and evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher shall be incorporated at the time of the post-observation conference, and be used to determine the final evaluation score. c. Artifacts should be “a natural harvest” of products generated in the course of the teacher’s practice to demonstrate proficiency. d. Emphasis should be placed on the collection of a small number of high quality artifacts demonstrating teacher performance, rather than quantity of artifacts submitted.

Artifacts and Evidence. a. The evaluator will collect and share artifacts and evidence necessary to complete the evaluation. b. The teacher may provide additional artifacts and evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher shall be incorporated at the time of the post-observation conference, and be used to determine the final evaluation score. c. Artifacts should not be created specifically for the evaluation process, but should be “a natural harvest” of products generated in the course of the teacher’s practice to demonstrate proficiencypractice. d. Emphasis should be placed on the collection of a small number of high quality artifacts demonstrating teacher performance, rather than quantity of artifacts submitted. e. Artifacts and evidence will include 3 examples supporting each goal.

Artifacts and Evidence. a. The evaluator will collect and share artifacts and evidence necessary to complete the evaluation. b. The teacher may provide provides additional artifacts and additional evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher shall be incorporated at the time of the post-observation conference, and be used to determine the final evaluation score. c. Artifacts should not be created specifically for the evaluation process, but should be “a natural harvest” of products generated in the course of the teacher’s practice to demonstrate proficiencypractice. d. Emphasis should be placed on the collection of a small number of high quality artifacts demonstrating teacher performance, rather than quantity of artifacts submitted.

Artifacts and Evidence. a. The evaluator will collect and share artifacts and evidence necessary to complete the evaluation. b. The teacher may provide additional artifacts and evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher shall may be incorporated at the time of the post-observation conference, and be used to determine the final evaluation score. c. Artifacts should not be created specifically for the evaluation process, but should be “a natural harvest” of products generated in the course of the teacher’s practice to demonstrate proficiencypractice. d. Emphasis should be placed on the collection of a small number of high quality artifacts demonstrating teacher performance, rather than quantity of artifacts submitted.

Artifacts and Evidence. a. 1. The evaluator will collect and share artifacts and evidence necessary to complete the evaluation. b. 2. The teacher may provide additional artifacts and evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher shall be incorporated at the time of the post-observation conference, and be used to determine the final evaluation score. c. 3. Artifacts should not be created specifically for the evaluation process, but should be “a natural harvest” of products generated in the course of the teacher’s practice to demonstrate proficiencypractice. d. 4. Emphasis should be placed on the collection of a small number of high quality artifacts demonstrating teacher performance, rather than quantity of artifacts submitted.

Artifacts and Evidence. a. The evaluator will collect and share artifacts and evidence necessary to complete the evaluation. b. The teacher may provide provides additional artifacts and additional evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher shall be incorporated at the time of the post-post- observation conference, and be used to determine the final evaluation score. c. Artifacts should not be created specifically for the evaluation process, but should be “a natural harvest” of products generated in the course of the teacher’s practice to demonstrate proficiencypractice. d. Emphasis should be placed on the collection of a small number of high quality artifacts demonstrating teacher performance, rather than quantity of artifacts submitted.