Assessing PAH Genotype Severity Using Assigned Value (AV Sample Clauses

Assessing PAH Genotype Severity Using Assigned Value (AV. Sum‌ PAH genotype severity was assessed using the assigned valued (AV) sum approach developed by Guldberg et al [186]. The method was created by evaluating nearly 300 functionally hemizygous patients with PKU and using the patients’ phenotypic severity to classifying a total of 105 different mutations. Each mutation was given an AV of 1, 2, 4, or 8. A lower mutation AV corresponds to a more severe phenotype. Mutations with an AV of 1 are considered particularly severe in nature, with many classified as putative null mutations. Mutations with AV >1 are associated with moderate or mild phenotypes, suggesting that the mutation retains some functionality. To assess the severity of a patient’s genotype, both mutations’ AVs are added together (the “AV sum”). AV sums range from 2 to 16, again with a lower number indicating a more severe phenotype. Some minor modifications to the AV sum approach were necessary for our analysis. First, there were certain mutations which had been assigned to multiple AVs due to a wide range of clinical phenotypes observed in the original analysis. In those instances, we only used the mutation AV most frequently designated by Guldberg et al (see Appendix in ref [186]). To expand our ability to give a patient an AV sum, decidedly severe mutations not previously evaluated in the AV sum analysis—such as large deletions, frame shift mutations, and disruptions of canonical splice site motifs—were given a mutation AV of 1. Finally, since not all mutations identified in our clinic population had a designated mutation AV, some patients were given an “indefinite AV sum” (e.g. ≥2, ≥3, ≥4, etc). The indefinite AV sum is, at minimum, one greater than the AV for the characterized mutation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Assessing PAH Genotype Severity Using Assigned Value (AV

  • Teaching Staff Assigned to More Than One Building Each Educator who is assigned to more than one building will be evaluated by the appropriate administrator where the individual is assigned most of the time. The principal of each building in which the Educator serves must review and sign the evaluation, and may add written comments. In cases where there is no predominate assignment, the superintendent will determine who the primary evaluator will be.

  • Professional Development; Adverse Consequences of School Exclusion; Student Behavior The Board President or Superintendent, or their designees, will make reasonable efforts to provide ongoing professional development to Board members about the adverse consequences of school exclusion and justice-system involvement, effective classroom management strategies, culturally responsive discipline, appropriate and available supportive services for the promotion of student attendance and engagement, and developmentally appropriate disciplinary methods that promote positive and healthy school climates, i.e., Senate Bill 100 training topics. Board Self-Evaluation The Board will conduct periodic self-evaluations with the goal of continuous improvement. New Board Member Orientation The orientation process for newly elected or appointed Board members includes:

  • BUY AMERICA REQUIREMENT (Applies only to Federally Funded Highway and Transit Projects) With respect to products purchased by Customer for use in federally funded highway projects, Contractor shall comply with all federal procurement laws and regulations with respect to such projects, including the Buy American provisions set forth in 23 U.S.C. Section 313, 23 C.F.R. Section 635.410, as amended, and the Steel and Iron Preference provisions of Texas Transportation Code Section 223.045, to the extent applicable. Contractor agrees to provide all certifications required by Customer regarding such programs. With respect to products purchased by Customer for use in federally funded transit projects, Contractor shall comply with all federal procurement laws and regulations with respect to such projects, including the Buy American provisions set forth in 49 U.S.C. Section 5323(j)(1), 49 C.F.R. Sections 661.6 or 661.12, to the extent applicable. Contractor agrees to provide all certifications required by Customer regarding such programs.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where Nex-Phon has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to Nex-Phon. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for Nex-Phon (e.g. hairpinning):

  • Bilingual Differential Pay Bilingual Differential Pay applies to those positions designated by the Department of Personnel Administration as eligible to receive bilingual pay according to the following standards:

  • Bilingual Differential When formally assigned in the employee’s position description, an employee assigned to interpret to or from another language to English will receive a differential of five percent (5%) of base pay.

  • Staffing Levels to deal with Potential Violence The Employer agrees that, where there is a risk of violence, an adequate level of trained employees should be present. The Employer recognizes that workloads can lead to fatigue and a diminished ability both to identify and to subsequently deal with potentially violent situations.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!