Ata-Jurt Sample Clauses

Ata-Jurt. (Fatherland) The Ata-Jurt party has played an important role in poli- tics since its establishment in 2004. A group of opposi- tion politicians founded the party in opposition to Pres- ident Xxxxx. However, the party only came to power after the violent ousting of President Xxxxxx in 2010 and won the most seats in Parliament (although it now has fewer seats as some deputies left to join deputies’ groups). The party was part of the ruling coalition in Parliament until the end of 2011 when the coalition col- lapsed. Since then, it has remained in opposition, adding a critical voice to ruling coalition decisions, and some of its members promote a nationalist agenda. Xxx-Xxxx’s position on Kumtor was made clear in October 2011 when then party leader Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx and several other party members staged a rally calling for the nationalization of the mine and then later stormed the Parliament building. Their arrest and imprisonment was a source of continuing protests and kept demands for nationalization in the spotlight. In the popular conscious, they are still associated with promoting nationalization, but under the current leadership of Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx- xxxxx, the official view is much more muted. In a written response,4 Ata-Jurt acknowledged that the mining industry was »one of the most important strate- gic industries in the republic.« However, the party noted that it did not have a joint position on the proposed agreement and opinions were split. Thus, the party did not provide an indication of whether they would oppose a 50/50 deal for the proposed agreement; instead, their letter focused on general issues on which they shared a consensus with other parties. In their letter, the party noted that there was strong po- tential for the industry to develop. »The mining industry may certainly become a locomotive for breakthrough development of the country, turning it into an industrial leader,« claimed the party. However, they noted that, despite such positive prospects, the industry was in a »state of crisis«. They listed corruption, political insta- bility and protests by people affected by mining opera- tions as major obstacles for the industry to overcome. In addition to this, Xxx-Xxxx claimed, »Some politicians or informal leaders use the large number of illiterate and unemployed youth to blackmail and extort investors.« The party noted that these issues have scared off po- tential investors and forced them to close down working projects. As a result, ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Ata-Jurt

  • WORK JURISDICTION Par. 1. It is agreed by the parties to this Agreement that all work specified in Article IV shall be performed exclusively by Elevator Constructor Mechanics, Elevator Constructor Helpers, Elevator Constructor Apprentices and Elevator Constructor Assistant Mechanics in the employ of the Company.

  • Program Requirements Provided At No Charge to the Judicial Council A. The Contractor shall provide the following items during the Program at no charge to the Judicial Council:

  • TRADE JURISDICTION This Article does not apply to Appendix "A", Sheeting and Decking. Refer to Clause 19, Local Appendices for additional provisions. This Agreement covers the rates of pay, rules and working conditions of all employees of the employer engaged in but not limited to:

  • Law, Jurisdiction, Venue, Waiver of Jury Trial This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida. All parties acknowledge and accept that jurisdiction of any controversies or legal problems arising out of this Agreement, and any action involving the enforcement or interpretation of any rights hereunder, shall be exclusively in the state courts of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida, and venue for litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be exclusively in such state courts, forsaking any other jurisdiction which either party may claim by virtue of its residency or other jurisdictional device. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, PURCHASER AND COUNTY HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT. IF A PARTY FAILS TO WITHDRAW A REQUEST FOR A JURY TRIAL IN A LAWSUIT ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT AFTER WRITTEN NOTICE BY THE OTHER PARTY OF VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, THE PARTY MAKING THE REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS OF THE OTHER PARTY IN CONTESTING THE REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL, AND SUCH AMOUNTS SHALL BE AWARDED BY THE COURT IN ADJUDICATING THE MOTION.

  • 000 JURISDICTION 8.100 Project maintenance conditions do not always justify adherence to craft lines which, in itself, does not establish precedent or change the appropriate jurisdiction of the crafts involved. Composite crews may be formed where conditions warrant, but this is not to be construed under regular operating conditions as the Company's prerogative to assign men out of their usual skill classification.

  • APPLICABLE LAW, FORUM, VENUE AND JURISDICTION (a) This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.

  • Exclusive Jurisdiction EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (B), EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO AGREES THAT ALL DISPUTES AMONG THEM ARISING OUT OF, CONNECTED WITH, RELATED TO, OR INCIDENTAL TO THE RELATIONSHIP ESTABLISHED AMONG THEM IN CONNECTION WITH, THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OF THE OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS WHETHER ARISING IN CONTRACT, TORT, EQUITY, OR OTHERWISE, SHALL BE RESOLVED EXCLUSIVELY BY STATE OR FEDERAL COURTS LOCATED IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, BUT THE PARTIES HERETO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY APPEALS FROM THOSE COURTS MAY HAVE TO BE HEARD BY A COURT LOCATED OUTSIDE OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO WAIVES IN ALL DISPUTES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (A) ANY OBJECTION THAT IT MAY HAVE TO THE LOCATION OF THE COURT CONSIDERING THE DISPUTE.

  • Submission to Jurisdiction Each party submits to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and of any New York State Court sitting in New York, New York for legal proceedings relating to this Agreement. Each party irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any objection that it may now or in the future have to the venue of a proceeding brought in such a court and any claim that the proceeding was brought in an inconvenient forum.

  • Payment by the Judicial Council A. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Judicial Council will pay the Contractor the actual cost not to exceed the total Contract Amount, as set forth in Table 1, below, for performing the Work of this Agreement. Payment will be at the prices set forth herein and based upon the actual and allowable cost to perform the Work. Table 1: Description Exhibit Estimated Total Cost Sleeping Rooms C $@,@@@.@@ Meeting and Function Rooms D $@,@@@.@@ Food and Beverage Service E $@,@@@.@@ Miscellaneous Requirements and Expenses F $@,@@@.@@ Total Contract Amount: $@@@@.@@

  • LAW & JURISDICTION This Call-Off Agreement and/or any non-contractual obligations or matters arising out of or in connection with it, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Laws of England and Wales and without prejudice to the dispute resolution procedures set out in Clause CO-14 or CO-19 (Dispute Resolution) each Party agrees to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales and for all disputes to be conducted within England and Wales.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.