Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering Sample Clauses
Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering. Neither Buyer nor any Buyer Subsidiary has any reason to believe that any facts or circumstances exist which would cause Buyer or the Buyer Subsidiaries to be deemed to be operating in violation in any material respect of the Bank Secrecy Act, the Patriot Act, any order issued with respect to anti-money laundering by the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or any other applicable anti-money laundering law. Furthermore, the Board of Directors of Buyer Sub has adopted and Buyer Sub has implemented an anti-money laundering program that contains adequate and appropriate customer identification verification procedures, that has not been deemed ineffective by any Governmental Authority and that meets the requirements of Sections 352 and 326 of the Patriot Act.
Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering. Except as set forth in Section 3.01(gg) of the Seller Disclosure Schedule, neither Seller nor any Seller Subsidiary has any reason to believe that any facts or circumstances exist, which would cause Seller or the Seller Subsidiaries to be deemed to be operating in violation in any material respect of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, as amended and its implementing regulations (31 C.F.R. Part 103) (the “Bank Secrecy Act”), the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Patriot Act”), any order issued with respect to anti-money laundering by the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or any other applicable anti-money laundering law. Furthermore, the Board of Directors of Seller Sub has adopted and Seller Sub has implemented an anti-money laundering program that contains adequate and appropriate customer identification verification procedures, that has not been deemed ineffective by any Governmental Authority and that meets the requirements of Sections 352 and 326 of the Patriot Act.
Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering. Cornerstone Bank has no reason to believe that any facts or circumstances exist which would cause it to be deemed to be operating in violation in any material respect of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, as amended and its implementing regulations (31 C.F.R. Part 1010) (the “Bank Secrecy Act”), the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Patriot Act”), any order issued with respect to anti-money laundering by the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or any other applicable anti-money laundering law. Furthermore, the Cornerstone Bank Board has adopted and Cornerstone Bank has implemented an anti-money laundering program that contains adequate and appropriate customer identification verification procedures, that has not been deemed ineffective by any Governmental Entity and that meets the requirements of Sections 352 and 326 of the Patriot Act.
Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering. Neither Yadkin nor any Yadkin Subsidiary has any reason to believe that any facts or circumstances exist, which would cause Yadkin or the Yadkin Subsidiaries to be deemed to be operating in violation in any material respect of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, as amended and its implementing regulations (31 C.F.R. Part 103) (the “Bank Secrecy Act”), the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Patriot Act”), any order issued with respect to anti-money laundering by the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or any other applicable anti-money laundering law. Furthermore, the Board of Directors of Yadkin and its Subsidiaries has adopted and implemented an anti-money laundering program that contains adequate and appropriate customer identification verification procedures, that has not been deemed ineffective by any Governmental Authority and that meets the requirements of Sections 352 and 326 of the Patriot Act.
Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering. Neither Buyer nor any Buyer Subsidiary has any reason to believe that any facts or circumstances exist that would cause Buyer or the Buyer Subsidiaries to be deemed to be operating in violation in any material respect of the Bank Secrecy Act, the Patriot Act, the FCPA, any order issued with respect to anti-money laundering by the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, any regulations promulgated by the CFPB or any other applicable anti-money laundering law or regulation. Furthermore, the Board of Directors of Buyer Sub has adopted and Buyer Sub has implemented an anti-money laundering program that contains adequate and appropriate customer identification verification procedures, that has not been deemed ineffective by any Governmental Authority and that meets the requirements of Sections 352 and 326 of the Patriot Act.
Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering. Neither Buyer or the Buyer Subsidiaries have any reason to believe that any facts or circumstances exist, which would cause Buyer or the Buyer Subsidiaries to be deemed to be operating in violation in any material respect of the Bank Secrecy Act, the Patriot Act, any order issued with respect to anti-money laundering by the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or any other applicable anti-money laundering law. Furthermore, the Board of Directors of WB Sub has adopted and the WB Sub has implemented an anti-money laundering program that contains adequate and appropriate customer identification verification procedures that has not been deemed ineffective by any Governmental Authority and that meets the requirements of Sections 352 and 326 of the Patriot Act.
Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering. Neither Atlantic Capital nor any Atlantic Capital Subsidiary has any reason to believe that any facts or circumstances exist, which would cause Atlantic Capital or the Atlantic Capital Subsidiaries to be deemed to be operating in violation of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, as amended and its implementing regulations (31 C.F.R. Part 103) (the “Bank Secrecy Act”), the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Patriot Act”), any order issued with respect to anti-money laundering by the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or any other applicable anti-money laundering law. Furthermore, the Board of Directors of Atlantic Capital and its Subsidiaries has adopted and implemented an anti-money laundering program that contains adequate and appropriate customer identification verification procedures, that has not been deemed ineffective by any Governmental Authority and that meets the requirements of Sections 352 and 326 of the Patriot Act.
Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering. FCB is operating in compliance in all material respects with the Bank Secrecy Act, the Patriot Act, any order issued with respect to anti-money laundering by the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or any other applicable anti-money laundering law. The Board of Directors of FCB has adopted and FCB has implemented an anti-money laundering program that meets the requirements of Sections 352 and 326 of the Patriot Act, and FCB has not received any written notice or communication from any Regulatory Authority to the effect that such program has been deemed ineffective, inadequate or noncompliant or that either of them have violated any of the above laws or regulations in any material respect.
Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering. Neither Buyer nor any Buyer Subsidiary has any reason to believe that any facts or circumstances exist, which would cause Buyer or the Buyer Subsidiaries to be deemed to be operating in violation in any material respect of the Bank Secrecy Act, the Patriot Act, any order issued with respect to anti-money laundering by the United States Department of the Treasury, or any other applicable anti-money laundering law. Furthermore, the Board of Directors of Buyer Bank has adopted and Buyer Bank has implemented an anti-money laundering program that contains adequate and appropriate customer identification verification procedures, that has not been deemed ineffective by any Governmental Authority and that meets the requirements of Sections 352 and 326 of the Patriot Act. Buyer has not engaged in any material “unfair, deceptive, or abusive practice” as such phrase is used in the Xxxx-Xxxxx Xxxx Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
Bank Secrecy Act; Patriot Act; Money Laundering. Each of the Cordia Companies is operating in compliance in all material respects with the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, as amended, and its implementing regulations (the “Bank Secrecy Act”), the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Patriot Act”), any order issued with respect to anti-money laundering by the US Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, or any other applicable anti-money laundering law. The Board of Directors of BOV has adopted and BOV has implemented an anti-money laundering program that meets the requirements of Sections 352 and 326 of the Patriot Act, and none of the Cordia Companies has received any written notice or communication from any Regulatory Authority to the effect that such program has been deemed ineffective, inadequate or noncompliant or that any of the Cordia Companies have violated any of the above laws or regulations in any material respect.