VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. DHS-USCIS, upon receipt of an immigration status verification case from CA-DSS regarding a Benefit Applicant for TANF and SNAP, agrees to provide CA-DSS through the SAVE Program the following information pertaining to the individual: SAVE Program case verification number, name, date and country of birth, date of entry, and immigration status data. The SAVE Program may also provide information regarding periods of employment authorization and the name, address, and social security number of the Benefit Applicant’s sponsor, if any, if requested by CA-DSS. See Section E for details. DHS-USCIS agrees to provide CA-DSS with instructional materials required for the proper use of the SAVE Program. These instructional materials address the policies and procedures governing use of the program, including (1) program access, (2) verification procedures, (3) disclosure of information and privacy protections, and (4) non- discrimination requirements. DHS-USCIS agrees to provide CA-DSS with a sufficient number of primary verification user codes to assure the effective implementation of this Agreement. DHS-USCIS agrees to provide CA-DSS with the name, address, and telephone number of appropriate points of contact (POC) within DHS-USCIS, or its contractor organization, to answer any questions about the program, including its proper use and billing issues. CA-DSS agrees to ensure, and report completion of, the proper training of its employees and contractors in the use of the SAVE program, to ensure that its employees and contractors will complete all verification procedures necessary to determine immigration status before making any adverse determination against a Benefit Applicant for reasons relating to the Benefit Applicant’s immigration status, to provide appropriate monitoring of CA-DSS’s use of the SAVE program to protect against misuse and abuse, and to respond in a timely manner to possible misuse of the program. To initiate a SAVE Program case, CA-DSS agrees to provide the alien registration number, I-94 number, or other immigration identifier or document of each benefit applicant whose immigration status must be verified to determine eligibility for TANF and SNAP administered by CA-DSS. If the SAVE Program cannot determine an individual’s records, requires additional information to provide an accurate response, or provides CA-DSS with information that does not match the status claimed by the individual, CA-DSS agrees that it will conduct additional verification ...
VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. ED may not suspend, terminate, reduce, or make a final denial of any financial assistance or payment under Title IV of the HEA to an individual, or take other adverse action against such individual as a result of information produced by this matching program until an institution participating in a program under Title IV of the HEA has asked the applicant to produce evidence of Veteran status or allows the applicant to file as a dependent student. Under the matching program, individual applicant records are matched at the time ED processes applications for Title IV, HEA Program assistance. ED will only send the records of applicants who reported that they are Veterans to VA for matching with the BIRLS System. As a result of an unsuccessful match (VA values 2, 3, or 4), ED notifies the applicant and the applicant’s educational institution that VA has not confirmed the applicant’s Veteran status via the application output document that is sent both to the institution and the applicant. If VA cannot confirm Veteran status, the applicant must provide proof of Veteran status to the institution if that is the sole reason the student qualified for independent status. For an applicant whose Veteran status is questioned, but he or she qualified as an independent student under criteria other than Veteran status, no further action is required of the applicant. Important features of this match are the volume and speed of the system. The system is designed to yield match results from applicant data in a short time frame so that applicants have information available to make informed decisions about the Title IV, HEA program assistance available at the institutions where they applied. In fact, the match is so efficient that up to 919 applications per day have been processed in peak months. The applicant is determined to be the best source of information on the validity of notice results. Consequently, ED’s notification process is highly automated and requires compressed verification procedures because it is not possible to intervene until after the output document (the Student Aid Report (SAR)/ Institutional Student Information Record - (ISIR)) is issued and challenged by the student. Individual applicants are required personally to resolve match discrepancies. Indeed, the OMB guidelines anticipate such a situation when they state: “It would be of dubious utility to apply the verification requirements equally to all matches and argue that a match that results in an advers...
VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. 6.3.1 Neither Party shall submit an LSR for LNP unless the Party submitting the LSR has first obtained express authorization from the Customer. For purposes of this Agreement, “express authorization” means an express, affirmative act by the Customer clearly agreeing to port that Customer’s number from one Party to the other. A Customer can give express authorization in any of the following forms:
(a) a written authorization from the Customer;
(b) an oral authorization verified and recorded by an independent third party;
(c) a recorded electronic authorization; or
(d) some other form of recorded authorization.
6.3.2 The Party submitting an LSR for LNP need not provide the other Party a copy of the express authorization in order for the LSR to be processed. However, should a question concerning the ported telephone number arise, the Party requesting the LSR shall immediately provide the other Party with a copy of the express authorization and shall also fully cooperate in efforts to verify that express authority existed to port the telephone number. If it is determined that the Party requesting the LSR did not have the express authority required by this Section 10.3 or otherwise failed to comply with the requirements of Applicable Law, then the Party requesting the LSR shall be solely responsible for all costs associated with the unauthorized porting. That Party also will indemnify and hold harmless the other Party from any liability, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, that may result from the unauthorized porting.
VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. SSA verifies the name/SSN combinations in its SORs. SSA will compare the identity of information in its records for the matched individual with the NDNH information and then determine whether the information in the NDNH is consistent with the information in SSA’s files. If the information is not consistent, SSA will contact the individual to confirm the information provided in the NDNH. If the individual is unable to confirm the information, SSA will contact the employer shown by the NDNH QW information to confirm the information shown by the comparison results, and the appropriate source agency to confirm the UI payment information. SSA will independently verify the NDNH information, investigate, and confirm information that is used as a basis for an adverse action against an individual, as described in 5 U.S.C. § 552a(p)(1) and (2).
VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. The supervisor may note opportunities for student participation and interaction and active monitoring of classroom instruction by the teacher. Evidence relating to this standard is included in the written observation summary and conference.
VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. This Standard may be verified through both formal and informal observations and awareness of teacher behavior both in and out of the classroom settings. Verification of the Standard is included in the written summary and conference. Teacher conference Teacher behavior tally Verbal flow chart Selective verbatim positive student feedback Teacher questioning and response behavior Recommended option: Audio and video taping
VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. Before an AE may take any adverse action based on the information received from the match, the individual will be permitted to provide the necessary information or documentation to verify eligibility information. When an AE determines that an individual is ineligible for an IAP based on the information provided by the match, and that information is inconsistent with information provided on the streamlined eligibility application or otherwise by an Applicant or Enrollee, the AE will comply with applicable law and will notify the Applicant, or Enrollee of the match findings and provide the following information: (1) The AE received information that indicates the individual is ineligible for an IAP; and (2) the Applicant, or Enrollee has a specified number of days from the date of the notice to contest the determination that the Applicant or Enrollee is not eligible for the relevant IAPs.
VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify procedures for verifying information produced in the matching program and an opportunity to contest findings, as required by subsection (p). 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(E). Subsection (p) of the Privacy Act provides as follows:
(1) In order to protect any individual whose records are used in a matching program, no recipient agency, non-Federal agency, or source agency may suspend, terminate, reduce, or make a final denial of any financial assistance or payment under a Federal benefit program to such individual, or take other adverse action against such individual, as a result of information produced by such matching program, until
(A) (i) the agency has independently verified the information;
(B) the individual receives a notice from the agency containing a statement of its findings and informing the individual of the opportunity to contest such findings; and
(i) the expiration of any time period established for the program by statute or regulation for the individual to respond to that notice; or
(ii) in the case of a program for which no such period is established, the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date on which notice under subparagraph (B) is mailed or otherwise provided to the individual.
(2) Independent verification referred to in paragraph (1) requires investigation and confirmation of specific information relating to an individual that is used as a basis for an adverse action against the individual, including where applicable investigation and confirmation of –
(A) the amount of any asset or income involved;
(B) whether such individual actually has or had access to such asset or income for such individual's own use; and
(C) the period or periods when the individual actually had such asset or income.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), an agency may take any appropriate action otherwise prohibited by such paragraph if the agency determines that the public health or public safety may be adversely affected or significantly threatened during any notice period required by such paragraph.
VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. The supervisor may note pertinent evidence relating to this Standard during formal and informal classroom observations and include this evidence in the written observation summary and conference.
VERIFICATION PROCEDURES. The BAO will conduct three enforcement verification inspections for this partnership. The first inspection will occur within 90 days of the signing of the agreement. The second inspection will occur within 1 year of signing the agreement and a final inspection will occur within 14 days of project completion. Citations and penalties may be issued, when appropriate, following these inspections. LAI and their sub-contractors are encouraged to participate in these inspections as a means and method of learning how BAO conducts and evaluates construction workplaces.
