Bonneville Power Administration Sample Clauses

Bonneville Power Administration. (Docket Nos. 08- 74725, 08-74811, 08-74900, 08-75008, 08-75091, 08-75098, 08-75099, 08-75112, 08-75113, 08-75130, 08-75132, 08-75133, 08-75161, 08-75165 (Consolidated) USCA-Ninth Circuit) (collectively, the “Current Litigation”). B. BPA, entities in the IOU Group and entities in the COU Group are also parties or intervenors to Avista Corporation, et al.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Bonneville Power Administration. (Docket Nos. 08-74927, 08- 74928, 08-74929, 08-74932, 08-74933, 08-74942, 08-74957 (Consolidated) USCA-Ninth Circuit) and to The Association of Public Agency Customers, et al.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Bonneville Power Administration. CEA ...................................... Canadian Electricity Association. CenterPoint .......................... CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC. Clinic ..................................... Xxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxxx Technology Law and Policy Clinic, University of Colorado Law School. Congressman Xxxxxx ........... Congressman Xxxxx Xxxxxx. 126 APPA, NRECA, and TAPS Comments at 6. Abbreviation Commenter
Sample 1
Bonneville Power Administration. Nos. 08-74927 et al. Shortly 25 thereafter, six other petitions for review were filed by various BPA customers and constituents 26 seeking review of the same or substantially the same actions. On January 16, 2009, the Court 27 issued an order consolidating all the petitions for review and granting interventions. Petitioner- 1 intervenors’ briefs, respondent BPA’s brief, respondent-intervenors’ briefs, and parties’ reply 2 briefs have been filed. The Court granted a motion to stay the consolidated cases while the 3 parties pursue mediation and settlement. 4
Sample 1
Bonneville Power Administration. Nos. 09-70228, 09-70236, 09-70988 (9th Cir. Aug. 28, 2009) (PNGC II), in which BPA determines that no payments are owing by Alcoa to BPA or by BPA to Alcoa, then Alcoa agrees that it waives any legal, equitable, or other claim or right of any nature that it has, or may have in the future, for money or any other remedy, with respect to the Block Power Sales Agreement by and between Alcoa, BPA, and Public Utility District No. 1 of Whatcom County, Washington (Contract No. 06PB-11744) (the Block Contract), as amended; provided, however, that the foregoing waiver by Alcoa will be of no force or effect in the event that the Ninth Circuit issues its mandate in a case in which it has granted a petition for review challenging the Remand ROD and has issued an order or opinion that finds such payments are required under the Block Contract or if BPA terminates this Agreement. that BPA improperly refused to offer the aluminum DSIs energy at a rate set under § 839e(c) before selling them power at an FPS rate.‖ BPA sought, and was denied rehearing on this question. Therefore, the surrender of Intalco’s claim for one-third of its otherwise unmet power needs that BPA must first offer within the Northwest region to Alcoa at the IP rate has a significant economic value, as well as the value of not disrupting BPA’s market-based electric power sales outside the region. Xxxxx Xxxxx – A-7 August 9, 2009 This waiver of the right to seek $195 million in restitution of the difference between the IP rate and the net power costs that Intalco actually incurred under the Block Power Sales Agreement forms additional consideration to BPA for entering into the 7-year contract. The Ninth Circuit in PNGC II observed: Petitioners also maintain that BPA’s decision to enter into the amended contract was not consistent with sound business principles because the agency did not first seek a refund of funds it improperly paid to Alcoa pursuant to the 2007 Contract. As BPA notes, however, there is a significant possibility that the DSIs do not owe BPA a refund. See infra Part IV.
Sample 1
Bonneville Power Administration. Because participants in the Wanapa Energy Center have requested to integrate power from the proposed electrical generating facility into the FCRTS at the XxXxxx Substation, BPA must decide whether and how to grant that request. These decisions include whether to connect a transmission line from the Wanapa Energy Center to the FCRTS, and whether to enter into contracts to interconnect the Center and integrate its power into the FCRTS. If BPA should decide to grant this request, the agency preferred transmission line route would be documented in the BPA ROD. The BPA also would decide whether to build or not to build the transmission line, if requested by the developer. BPA intends to base its decision on the following objectives: • An adequate, economical, efficient and reliable power supply to the Pacific Northwest, including FCRTS electrical stability and reliability; • Consistency with BPA environmental and social responsibilities; and • Cost and administrative efficiency.
Sample 1
Bonneville Power Administration. XXXX Digitally signed by XXXX XXXXXXXX HAIRSTONDate: 2022.09.30 By: Title:
Sample 1

Related to Bonneville Power Administration

  • Cloud Computing State Risk and Authorization Management Program In accordance with Senate Bill 475, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., pursuant to Texas Government Code, Section 2054.0593, Contractor acknowledges and agrees that, if providing cloud computing services for System Agency, Contractor must comply with the requirements of the state risk and authorization management program and that System Agency may not enter or renew a contract with Contractor to purchase cloud computing services for the agency that are subject to the state risk and authorization management program unless Contractor demonstrates compliance with program requirements. If providing cloud computing services for System Agency that are subject to the state risk and authorization management program, Contractor certifies it will maintain program compliance and certification throughout the term of the Contract.

  • Agreement Administration SBBC has delegated authority to the Superintendent of Schools or his/her designee to take any actions necessary to implement and administer this Agreement.

  • Project Administration The Contractor shall provide project administration for all Subcontractors, vendors, suppliers, and others involved in implementing the Work and shall coordinate administration efforts with those of the A/E and ODR in accordance with these Uniform General and Supplementary Conditions and provisions of Division 1 Specifications, and as outlined in the Pre- construction Conference.

  • Statewide HUB Program Statewide Procurement Division Note: In order for State agencies and institutions of higher education (universities) to be credited for utilizing this business as a HUB, they must award payment under the Certificate/VID Number identified above. Agencies, universities and prime contractors are encouraged to verify the company’s HUB certification prior to issuing a notice of award by accessing the Internet (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/tpasscmblsearch/index.jsp) or by contacting

  • Transportation Management Tenant shall fully comply with all present or future programs intended to manage parking, transportation or traffic in and around the Building, and in connection therewith, Tenant shall take responsible action for the transportation planning and management of all employees located at the Premises by working directly with Landlord, any governmental transportation management organization or any other transportation-related committees or entities.

  • Personnel, Office Space, and Facilities of Manager The Manager at its own expense shall furnish or provide and pay the cost of such office space, office equipment, office personnel, and office services as the Manager requires in the performance of its investment advisory and other obligations under this Agreement.

  • STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM If the maximum amount payable to Contractor under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this section shall apply. Contractor agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §§00-000-000, 00-000-000, 00-000-000, and 00- 000-000, C.R.S. regarding the monitoring of vendor performance and the reporting of contract information in the State’s contract management system (“Contract Management System” or “CMS”). Contractor’s performance shall be subject to evaluation and review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, Colorado statutes governing CMS, and State Fiscal Rules and State Controller policies.

  • Department’s Contract Manager The Department’s Contract Manager, who is primarily responsible for the Department’s oversight of the Contract, will be identified in a separate writing to the Contractor upon Contract signing in the following format: Department’s Contract Manager Name Department’s Name Department’s Physical Address Department’s Telephone # Department’s Email Address If the Department changes the Contract Manager, the Department will notify the Contractor. Such a change does not require an amendment to the Contract.

  • Reactive Power and Primary Frequency Response 9.6.1 Power Factor Design Criteria

  • Interconnection Customer Authority Consistent with Good Utility Practice, this LGIA, and the CAISO Tariff, the Interconnection Customer may take actions or inactions with regard to the Large Generating Facility or the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities during an Emergency Condition in order to (i) preserve public health and safety, (ii) preserve the reliability of the Large Generating Facility or the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities,