Circumstances Permitting Referral for Psychological Examination Sample Clauses

Circumstances Permitting Referral for Psychological Examination. The City may require an employee to be examined where there exists a reasonable cause to believe, based upon specific observations and facts and rational inferences drawn from those observations and facts, that the employee may be suffering from a mental condition and such condition prevents the employee from effectively performing the essential job duties or poses a threat to the health and safety of the employee or others. Such reasonable suspicion must be based upon the observations of at least two supervisors or co-workers who have first-hand knowledge or upon reliable information provided to a supervisor that employee is currently exhibiting conduct which reasonably demonstrates that the aforementioned circumstances exists. However, before making the referral, the Chief or his/her designee shall verify the validity of the circumstances by meeting with the employee or conducting an investigation as to the factual basis of the alleged conduct.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Circumstances Permitting Referral for Psychological Examination. The City may require an employee to be examined where there exists a reasonable cause to believe, based upon specific observations and facts and rational inferences drawn from those observations and facts, that the employee may be suffering from a mental condition and such condition prevents the employee from effectively performing the essential job duties or poses a threat to the health and safety of the employee or others.

Related to Circumstances Permitting Referral for Psychological Examination

  • Termination for Catastrophe In event of Catastrophic Damage, this contract may be modified un- der B8.32, following rate redetermination under B3.32, or terminated under this Subsection. Such termination shall not be considered a termination under B8.34.

  • Examination of an application for an industrial design 1. A formal examination of the application for an industrial design received by the federal executive authority for intellectual property is carried out which includes checks on presence of the documents specified in clause 2 of Article 1377 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and its compliance with the established requirements. If the result of the formal examination is positive, then a substantive examination of an application for an industrial design is carried out, which includes: information search in relation to the claimed industrial design to determine the publicly available information, which shall be taken into account when examining the design patentability; examination of the claimed industrial design for the compliance with the requirements under Article 1231.1, clause 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and the patentability criteria under the first paragraph of clause 1, clause 5 of Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation; examination of the claimed industrial design for the compliance with the patentability criteria under the second paragraph of clause 1 of Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. An information search in relation to the objects specified in sub-clause 4 of clause 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation shall not be carried out, and the federal executive authority on intellectual property notifies the applicant about it. 2. If, as a result of the substantive examination of an application for an industrial design, it is found that the claimed industrial design represented on the reproductions of an external appearance of the article does not relate to the objects specified in Article 1231.1 or clause 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and meets the patentability criteria under Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the federal executive authority for intellectual property makes a decision to grant a patent for an industrial design. The date of filing of the application for the industrial design and the priority date of the industrial design shall be specified in the decision. If, during the process of substantive examination of an application for an industrial design, it is found that the claimed object does not meet at least one of the requirements or patentability criteria specified in paragraph one of this clause, the federal executive authority for intellectual property makes a decision to refuse the issuance of a patent.

  • Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion First Tier Participants:

  • Termination for Force Majeure In the event of a force majeure that lasts longer than thirty (30) days from the date that a Party claiming relief due to the force majeure event gives notice to the other Party, the Party not claiming relief under the force majeure event may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other Party. For the avoidance of doubt, the COVID-19 pandemic does not constitute a force majeure event.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.