City Review of Schedule Sample Clauses

City Review of Schedule. The City may review the Contractor’s submitted schedule and may note any exceptions. The Contractor shall correct any exceptions noted by the City within five (5) working days of being notified of the exceptions. The City’s acceptance of a schedule does not relieve the Contractor from sole responsibility for scheduling, sequencing, and pursuing the Work to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. If the Contractor submits any schedule that provides for a completion date earlier than the Time of Completion it is expressly understood that the City will not pay additional money for early completion or damages, no matter what the cause for the contractor’s inability or meet the original completion date. The Contractor shall not submit any Project schedule or schedule of values that shows the Contractor has engaged in front-end loading. “Front-end loading” is defined to mean the overestimation of the cost of work to be performed at the beginning of the Project and underestimating the cost of work to be performed at the end.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to City Review of Schedule

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Review of Submittals A/E and ODR review is only for conformance with the design concept and the information provided in the Contract Documents. Responses to submittals will be in writing. The approval of a separate item does not indicate approval of an assembly in which the item functions. The approval of a submittal does not relieve the Contractor of responsibility for any deviation from the requirements of the Contract unless the Contractor informs the A/E and ODR of such deviation in a clear, conspicuous, and written manner on the submittal transmittal and at the time of submission, and obtains the A/E’s and Owner’s written specific approval of the particular deviation.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Recovery Schedule If the initial schedule or any current updates fail to reflect the Work’s actual plan or method of operation, or a contractual milestone date is more than fifteen (15) days behind, Owner may require that a recovery schedule for completion of the remaining Work be submitted. The Recovery Schedule must be submitted within seven (7) calendar days of Owner’s request. The Recovery Schedule shall describe in detail Construction Contractor’s plan to complete the remaining Work by the required Contract milestone date. The Recovery Schedule submitted shall meet the same requirements as the original Construction Schedule. The narrative submitted with the Recovery Schedule should describe in detail all changes that have been made to meet the Contract milestone dates.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Evaluation Schedule CLIENT REFERENCES The Tenderer shall provide details of his performance on each of the previous projects listed in the “Relevant Experience” returnable schedule. “Client Reference Scorecards” will be completed by each of the respective Clients for the projects listed in the “Relevant Experience” returnable schedule. The following are to be completed by the Client and Principal Agent and is to be supported in each case by a letter of award and the works completion certificate. Both Client and Principal Agent must sign and stamp the documents, failure to obtain both signatures and stamps will result in no allocation of points. PROJECT NAME and SCOPE OF WORK: Principal agent: ................................................................................................................................. Client: .. ..............................................................................................................................................

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Problem Statement School bus fleets are aging, and our communities have poor air quality. Replacing school buses with zero emission school buses will address both of these issues.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!