Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit Sample Clauses

Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit. 1. The respondent may, no later than thirty days after the constitution of a division of the Tribunal pursuant to Article 3.9 (Tribunal of First Instance) and in any event before the first session of the division of the Tribunal, file an objection that a claim is manifestly without legal merit. 2. The respondent shall specify as precisely as possible the basis for the objection. 3. The Tribunal, after giving the disputing parties an opportunity to present their observations on the objection, shall, at the first session of the division of the Tribunal or promptly thereafter, issue a decision or provisional award on the objection. 4. This procedure and any decision of the Tribunal shall be without prejudice to the right of a respondent to object, pursuant to Article 3.15 (Claims Unfounded as a Matter of Law) or in the course of the proceedings, to the legal merits of a claim and without prejudice to the Tribunal's authority to address other objections as a preliminary question.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit. 1. The respondent may, no later than thirty days after the constitution of a division of the Tribunal pursuant to Article 3.9 (Tribunal of First Instance) and in any event before the first session of the division of the Tribunal, file an objection that a claim is manifestly without legal merit. 2. The respondent shall specify as precisely as possible the basis for the objection. 3. The Tribunal, after giving the disputing parties an opportunity to present their observations on the objection, shall, at the first session of the division of the Tribunal or promptly thereafter, issue a decision or provisional award on the objection. 4. This procedure and any decision of the Tribunal shall be without prejudice to the right of a respondent to object, pursuant to Article 3.15 (Claims Unfounded as a Matter of Law) or in the course of the proceedings, to the legal merits of a claim and without prejudice to the Tribunal's authority to address other objections as a preliminary question. 7 For greater certainty, the domestic law of the Parties shall not be part of the applicable law. Where the Tribunal is required to ascertain the meaning of a provision of the domestic law of one of the Parties as a matter of fact, it shall follow the prevailing interpretation of that provision made by the courts or authorities of that Party, and any meaning given to the relevant domestic law made by the Tribunal shall not be binding upon the courts or the authorities of either Party. The Tribunal shall not have jurisdiction to determine the legality of a measure, alleged to constitute a breach of this Agreement, under the domestic law of the disputing Party.
Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit. 1. The respondent may, no later than 30 days after the constitution of the division of the Tribunal, and in any event before its first session, file an objection that a claim is manifestly without legal merit. 2. An objection shall not be submitted under paragraph 1 if the respondent has filed an objection pursuant to Article 8.33. 3. The respondent shall specify as precisely as possible the basis for the objection. 4. On receipt of an objection pursuant to this Article, the Tribunal shall suspend the proceedings on the merits and establish a schedule for considering such an objection consistent with its schedule for considering any other preliminary question. 5. The Tribunal, after giving the disputing parties an opportunity to present their observations, shall at its first session or promptly thereafter, issue a decision or award stating the grounds therefor. In doing so, the Tribunal shall assume the alleged facts to be true. 6. This Article shall be without prejudice to the Tribunal’s authority to address other objections as a preliminary question or to the right of the respondent to object, in the course of the proceeding, that a claim lacks legal merit.
Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit. 1. The respondent may, no later than 30 days after the constitution of the division of the Tribunal pursuant to Article 10.33
Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit. 24.1. The respondent CONTRACTING PARTY may, no later than 30 calendar days after the constitution of the ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL, and in any event before its first session, file an objection that a claim is manifestly without legal merit. 24.2. An objection shall not be submitted under Article 24.1 if the respondent CONTRACTING PARTY has filed an objection pursuant to Article 25. 24.3. The respondent CONTRACTING PARTY shall specify as precisely as possible the basis for the objection. 24.4. On receipt of an objection pursuant to this Article 24, the ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL shall suspend the proceedings on the merits and establish a schedule for considering such an objection consistent with its schedule for considering any other preliminary question. 24.5. The ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL, after giving the DISPUTING PARTIES an opportunity to present their observations, shall at its first session or promptly thereafter, issue a decision or ARBITRAL AWARD stating the grounds therefor. In doing so, the ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL shall assume the alleged facts to be true. The decision of the ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL shall issue the decision or ARBITRAL AWARD within 4 calendar months from the objection having been filed. 24.6. This Article shall be without prejudice to the ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL's authority to address other objections as a preliminary question or to the right of the respondent CONTRACTING PARTY to object, in the course of the proceeding, that a claim lacks legal merit.
Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit. 1. The respondent may, no later than 30 days after the constitution of the Tribunal, and in any event before the first session of the Tribunal, file an objection that a claim is manifestly without legal merit. 2. An objection may not be submitted under paragraph 1 if the respondent has filed an objection pursuant to Article 19 (L). 3. The respondent shall specify as precisely as possible the basis for the objection. 4. On receipt of an objection pursuant to this Article, the Tribunal shall suspend the proceedings on the merits and establish a schedule for considering any objections consistent with its schedule for considering any other preliminary question. 5. The Tribunal, after giving the disputing parties an opportunity to present their observations, shall at its first session or promptly thereafter, issue a decision or award, stating the grounds therefor. In doing so, the Tribunal shall assume the alleged facts to be true. 6. This Article shall be without prejudice to the Tribunal’s authority to address other objections as a preliminary question or to the right of the respondent to object, in the course of the proceeding, that a claim lacks legal merit.
Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit. 1. The respondent may, no later than 30 days after the constitution of the division of the Tribunal pursuant to Article 10.33 (7) (Tribunal of First Instance (“Tribunal”)), and in any event before the first session of the division of the Tribunal, or 30 days after the respondent became aware of the facts on which the objection is based, file an objection that a claim is manifestly without legal merit. 2. The respondent shall specify as precisely as possible the basis for the objection. 3. The Tribunal, after giving the disputing parties an opportunity to present their observations on the objection, shall, at the first session of the division of the Tribunal or promptly thereafter, issue a decision or provisional award on the objection, stating the grounds therefor. In the event that the objection is received after the first session of the division of the Tribunal, the Tribunal shall issue such decision or provisional award as soon as possible, and no later than 120 days after the objection was filed. In deciding the objection, the Tribunal shall assume the facts as alleged by the claimant to be true, and may also consider any relevant facts not in dispute. 4. The decision of the Tribunal shall be without prejudice to the right of a disputing party to object, pursuant to Article 10.42 (Claims Unfounded as a Matter of Law) or in the course of the proceeding, to the legal merits of a claim and without prejudice to the Tribunal's authority to address other objections as a preliminary question.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit. 1. The respondent may, no later than thirty days after the constitution of a division of the Tribunal pursuant to Article 3.9 (Tribunal of First Instance) and in any event before the first session of the division of the Tribunal, file an objection that a claim is manifestly without legal merit. 1 For greater certainty, the domestic law of the Parties shall not be part of the applicable law. Where the Tribunal is required to ascertain the meaning of a provision of the domestic law of one of the Parties as a matter of fact, it shall follow the prevailing interpretation of that provision made by the courts or authorities of that Party, and any meaning given to the relevant domestic law made by the Tribunal shall not be binding upon the courts or the authorities of either Party. The Tribunal shall not have jurisdiction to determine the legality of a measure, alleged to constitute a breach of this Agreement, under the domestic law of the disputing Party. 2. The respondent shall specify as precisely as possible the basis for the objection. 3. The Tribunal, after giving the disputing parties an opportunity to present their observations on the objection, shall, at the first session of the division of the Tribunal or promptly thereafter, issue a decision or provisional award on the objection. 4. This procedure and any decision of the Tribunal shall be without prejudice to the right of a respondent to object, pursuant to Article 3.15 (Claims Unfounded as a Matter of Law) or in the course of the proceedings, to the legal merits of a claim and without prejudice to the Tribunal's authority to address other objections as a preliminary question.

Related to Claims Manifestly without Legal Merit

  • Independent Legal Counsel an attorney or firm of attorneys, selected in accordance with the provisions of Section 3, who shall not have otherwise performed services for the Company or Indemnitee within the last five years (other than with respect to matters concerning the rights of Indemnitee under this Agreement, or of other indemnitees under similar indemnity agreements).

  • Independent Legal and Tax Advice Optionee acknowledges that the Company has advised Optionee to obtain independent legal and tax advice regarding the grant and exercise of the Option and the disposition of any Shares acquired thereby.

  • Causes The contract may be terminated before the stated completion date by any of the following conditions. 1. By mutual agreement and consent, in writing from both parties. 2. By the State by notice in writing to the Engineer as a consequence of failure by the Engineer to perform the services set forth herein in a satisfactory manner. 3. By either party, upon the failure of the other party to fulfill its obligations as set forth herein. 4. By the State for reasons of its own, not subject to the mutual consent of the Engineer, by giving thirty business days notice of termination in writing to the Engineer. 5. By the State, if the Engineer violates the provisions of Attachment A, General Provisions Article 21, Gratuities, or Attachment H, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise/Historically Underutilized Business Requirements. 6. By satisfactory completion of all services and obligations described herein.

  • How to Request an External Appeal If you remain dissatisfied with our medical appeal determination, you may request an external review by an outside review agency. In accordance with §27-18.9-8, your external appeal will be reviewed by one of the external independent review organizations (IRO) approved by the Office of the Health Insurance Commissioner. The IRO is selected using a rotational method. Your claim does not have to meet a minimum dollar threshold in order for you to be able to request an external appeal. To request an external appeal, submit a written request to us within four (4) months of your receipt of the medical appeal denial letter. We will forward your request to the outside review agency within five (5) business days, unless it is an urgent appeal, and then we will send it within two (2) business days. We may charge you a filing fee up to $25.00 per external appeal, not to exceed $75.00 per plan year. We will refund you if the denial is reversed and will waive the fee if it imposes an undue hardship for you. Upon receipt of the information, the outside review agency will notify you of its determination within ten (10) calendar days, unless it is an urgent appeal, and then you will be notified within seventy-two (72) hours. The determination by the outside review agency is binding on us. Filing an external appeal is voluntary. You may choose to participate in this level of appeal or you may file suit in an appropriate court of law (see Legal Action, below). Once a member or provider receives a decision at one of the several levels of appeals noted above, (reconsideration, appeal, external), the member or provider may not ask for an appeal at the same level again, unless additional information that could affect such decisions can be provided.

  • Other Legal Actions The actions stipulated in this Integrity Pact are without prejudice to any other legal action that may follow in accordance with the provisions of the extant law in force relating to any civil or criminal proceedings.

  • No Legal Actions No court or governmental authority of competent jurisdiction shall have issued an order, not subsequently vacated, restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and no person shall have instituted an action or proceeding which shall not have been previously dismissed seeking to restrain, enjoin or prohibit the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or seeking damages with respect thereto.

  • Independent Legal Advice Each of the Parties hereby acknowledges that it has been afforded the opportunity to obtain independent legal advice and confirms by the execution and delivery of this Agreement that they have either done so or waived their right to do so in connection with the entering into of this Agreement.

  • No Legal Impediments The making of the Loans or the Issuance of such Letter of Credit on such date does not violate any Requirement of Law on the date of or immediately following such Loan or Issuance of such Letter of Credit and is not enjoined, temporarily, preliminarily or permanently. Each submission by the Borrower to the Administrative Agent of a Notice of Borrowing or a Swing Loan Request and the acceptance by the Borrower of the proceeds of each Loan requested therein, and each submission by the Borrower to an Issuer of a Letter of Credit Request, and the Issuance of each Letter of Credit requested therein, shall be deemed to constitute a representation and warranty by the Borrower as to the matters specified in clause (b) above on the date of the making of such Loan or the Issuance of such Letter of Credit.

  • Notice of Legal Matter or Litigation Grantee will send notice to the Substance Use Disorder (SUD) email box, XxxxxxxxxXxxxx.Xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxxxx.xx.xx of any litigation or legal matter related to or affecting this Contract within seven (7) calendar days of becoming aware of the litigation or legal matter.

  • No Legal Action No action or proceeding shall be pending or threatened by any Person to enjoin, restrict or prohibit any of the Transactions or the right of the Purchaser to conduct the Purchaser Business after Closing on substantially the same basis as heretofore conducted.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!