Comprehensive Evaluation of Core Faculty Sample Clauses

Comprehensive Evaluation of Core Faculty a. In the Spring Quarter of the Core faculty member’s provisional term(s), the faculty member shall undergo a comprehensive evaluation. After the provisional period is complete, Core faculty shall undergo a comprehensive evaluation every fifth year. Deadlines for the steps in the comprehensive evaluation processes will be identified in the Academic Calendar maintained by the CAO. b. The comprehensive evaluation committees will be formed by the end of Fall Quarter. They will consist of two (2) or three (3) faculty members and the academic unit head. Faculty members participating in comprehensive evaluation committees must be Core or annually-contracted full-time faculty members. When possible, at least two (2) of the faculty members should be Core faculty members, and at least one (1) Core faculty member should teach within the same academic unit as the faculty member being reviewed. One (1) faculty member on the committee should be selected from a program different from the one in which the faculty member subject to evaluation teaches. c. Participants in the comprehensive evaluation committees will be selected by the academic unit head after consulting with the faculty member. d. Comprehensive evaluation of faculty members will be based on a summary of student evaluations, at least one (1) classroom observation conducted since the previous comprehensive evaluation, a review of the syllabi and course materials, evidence of the faculty member’s scholarship or professional/artistic or other achievements in their field, presentation of scholarly research by the faculty member, additional statements from colleagues and students, and faculty self-assessment, as well as institutional citizenship and community engagement materials. The evaluators shall give consideration to all relevant material provided by the faculty member in advance of the evaluation being prepared.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Comprehensive Evaluation of Core Faculty

  • Comprehensive Evaluation The Comprehensive evaluation is a growth-oriented, teacher/evaluator collaborative process that requires teachers to be evaluated on the eight (8) state criteria. A teacher must complete a Comprehensive evaluation once every six (6) years. During subsequent years, teachers will be evaluated on a Focused evaluation unless a comprehensive is requested by administration or the teacher.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • General Background (Brief description of the national, sector-specific or other relevant context in which the individual contractor will operate)

  • Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance for coverage of owned and non-owned and hired vehicles, trailers or semi-trailers designed for travel on public roads, with a minimum, combined single limit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, including death, and property damage.

  • Comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance, insuring against all liability of the Contractor related to this Agreement, with a minimum combined single limit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) Personal & Advertising Injury, Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) Products/Completed Operations Aggregate, and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) general aggregate;

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!