Conclusion of the theoretical study Sample Clauses

Conclusion of the theoretical study. A criterion based on the total VSSA to identify nanomaterials has been developed in as an outcome of the NanoReg, Deliverable D2.11 and it can be applied to several nanomaterials with the following several conditions: - The threshold should be adapted to particle geometry; this implies to have a qualitative electron microscopy picture to choose the appropriate shape factor. - The particle size distribution should be mono-modal. Limitations occur in the case of bimodal distributions. - Only the external surface of the particles is linked to their size and hence the surface area. In most cases, the total VSSA criterion is overprotective for the 50% threshold applied to the number distribution of particle sizes. It means that having less than 50% of the particles below 100 nm but characterized by a VSSA higher than the threshold, are wrongly considered as nanomaterials. The total VSSA approach will lead to many false positive nanomaterials. On the other hand, if VSSA is below the threshold, the sample can be considered as a non-nanomaterial. If the distribution of the primary particles is mono-modal, there is no false negative identification for free, agglomerated or softly aggregated samples (Figure 6). This may be a useful and easy tool to identify non-nanomaterials. When the aggregation is much higher by their broad particle size distributions, the sample can be considered as nanostructured or nano-porous. In that case, the pores size and volume could be interesting parameters to identify nanomaterials together with VSSA.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Conclusion of the theoretical study

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Conclusion of the contract 1. An Agreement is deemed to be concluded with the Contractor only after the Principal accepts an offer by the Contractor without reservations or if the Principal receives a written order confirmation from the Contractor or if the Contractor commences the provision of the service. If the Contractor issues a written order confirmation, such order confirmation is decisive in terms of content and scope of the Agreement unless expressly negotiated otherwise.

  • Facilities Study In analyzing and preparing the Facilities Study, and in designing and constructing the Attachment Facilities, Local Upgrades and/or Network Upgrades described in the Specifications attached to this ISA, Transmission Provider, the Interconnected Transmission Owner(s), and any other subcontractors employed by Transmission Provider have had to, and shall have to, rely on information provided by Interconnection Customer and possibly by third parties and may not have control over the accuracy of such information. Accordingly, NEITHER TRANSMISSION PROVIDER, THE INTERCONNECTED TRANSMISSION OWNER(s), NOR ANY OTHER SUBCONTRACTORS EMPLOYED BY TRANSMISSION PROVIDER OR INTERCONNECTED TRANSMISSION OWNER MAKES ANY WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WHETHER ARISING BY OPERATION OF LAW, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE OR DEALING, CUSTOM, USAGE IN THE TRADE OR PROFESSION, OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH REGARD TO THE ACCURACY, CONTENT, OR CONCLUSIONS OF THE FACILITIES STUDY OR THE SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY IF A FACILITIES STUDY WAS NOT REQUIRED OR OF THE ATTACHMENT FACILITIES, THE LOCAL UPGRADES AND/OR THE NETWORK UPGRADES, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that Transmission Provider warrants that the Transmission Owner Interconnection Facilities and any Merchant Transmission Upgrades described in the Specifications will be designed and constructed (to the extent that Interconnected Transmission Owner is responsible for design and construction thereof) and operated in accordance with Good Utility Practice, as such term is defined in the Operating Agreement. Interconnection Customer acknowledges that it has not relied on any representations or warranties not specifically set forth herein and that no such representations or warranties have formed the basis of its bargain hereunder.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing The Employer may, but does not have a legal duty to, request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the Employer or any supervisor of the employee has a reasonable suspicion (a belief based on specific facts and rational inferences drawn from those facts) related to the performance of the job that the employee:

  • Conclusione La presente Licenza resterà xxxxxx xxxx xxxx sua conclusione. Apple porrà termine automaticamente e senza preavviso ai diritti garantiti da questa Licenza in caso di inadempienza di qualsiasi xxxxxxx xxxxx Licenza stessa. In seguito alla conclusione di questa Licenza è fatto obbligo di interrompere l’utilizzo del Software Apple e di distruggere tutte le copie, totali o parziali, del medesimo. I paragrafi 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 e 11 della presente Licenza rimarranno validi anche dopo la conclusione della stessa.

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Intrusion Detection All systems involved in accessing, holding, transporting, and protecting PHI COUNTY discloses to CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY that are accessible via the Internet must be protected by a comprehensive intrusion detection and prevention solution.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.