CONTRACT AWARD CRITERION AND DECISION Sample Clauses

CONTRACT AWARD CRITERION AND DECISION. Criterion for selecting the best bid shall be the lowest percentage amount of the difference between the payment and payoff of assets of the participants in the games of chance with deducted charges towards the state (Republic of Macedonia), pursuant to law. The exact manner of calculation shall be described in detail in the Technical Documentation, which is attached to and an integral part of the Public Announcement. The decision on selection of the best bid, on proposal of the Commission that conducted the procedure, shall be made by the General Manager of NVLM. Against the decision, the dissatisfied participant in the public announcement may submit an objection to the Shareholders Assembly of the National Video Lottery of the Republic of Macedonia within 8 (eight) days from the date of receiving the notice of selection. The written objection shall be submitted through the Commission that carried out the procedure, to the Shareholders Assembly of the National Video Lottery of the Republic of Macedonia. The Decision of the Shareholders Assembly of the National Video Lottery of the Republic of Macedonia in the procedure for signing a business collaboration contract with the National Video Lottery of the Republic of Macedonia shall be final. Upon the final Decision for fulfilment of the conditions for business collaboration, the selected participant in the public announcement shall be obliged to sign a business collaboration contract, within 15 days from delivery of the Decision. The Business Collaboration Contract shall be notarized at the expense of the business associate.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CONTRACT AWARD CRITERION AND DECISION. Criterion for selecting the best bid shall be the lowest percentage amount of the difference between the payment and payoff of assets of the participants in the games of chance with deducted charges towards the state (Republic of Macedonia), pursuant to law for all active VLT of NVLM. The decision on selection of the best bid, on proposal of the Commission that conducted the procedure, shall be made by the General Manager of NVLM. Against the decision, the dissatisfied participant in the public announcement may submit an objection to the Shareholders Assembly of the National Video Lottery of the Republic of Macedonia within 8 (eight) days from the date of receiving the notice of selection. The written objection shall be submitted through the Commission that carried out the procedure, to the Shareholders Assembly of the National Video Lottery of the Republic of Macedonia. The Decision of the Shareholders Assembly of the National Video Lottery of the Republic of Macedonia in the procedure for signing a business collaboration contract with the National Video Lottery of the Republic of Macedonia shall be final. Upon the final Decision for fulfilment of the conditions for business collaboration, the selected participant in the public announcement shall be obliged to sign a business collaboration contract, within 15 days from delivery of the Decision. The Business Collaboration Contract shall be notarized at the expense of the business associate.

Related to CONTRACT AWARD CRITERION AND DECISION

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Performance during Dispute Resolution Pending the submission of and/or decision on a Dispute and until the arbitral award is published; the Parties shall continue to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement without prejudice to a final adjustment in accordance with such award.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • METHOD OF AWARD AND PROCEDURE FOR AWARDING A SOW AGREEMENT 5.1. Contractor selection, or the determination to terminate the SOW-RFP without award, shall be done in the best interest of the State.

  • Construction Change Directives 7.3.1 A Construction Change Directive is written order prepared by the Architect and signed by the Owner and Architect, directing a change in the Work and stating a proposed basis for adjustment, if any, in the Contract Sum, or Contract Time, or both. The Owner may by Construction Change Directive, without invalidating the Contract, order changes in the Work within the general scope of the Contract consisting of additions, deletions or other revisions, the Contract Sum and Contract Time being adjusting accordingly.

  • Contract Award Award shall be made on a lump sum basis to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. The lowest bid will be the bid whose price, after incorporating all accepted alternates, is the lowest responsive bid that was received from a responsible bidder. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of thirty-five days after time has been called on the date of opening except in accordance with the provisions of law.

  • Performance Orders A Performance Order:

  • Further Competition Award Criteria 1. Where a Contracting Body may require Suppliers to develop proposals or a solution in respect of its Statement of Requirements or need to amend or refine the terms of the Call-Off Contract to reflect its Statement of Requirements to the extent permitted by and in accordance with applicable laws (including procurement laws and all necessary guidance), the following criteria shall be applied to the Services set out in the Framework Service Providers' compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure:

  • Performance Provisions A. Monitoring

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.