Cooperative Traffic TSoS Use Case Sample Clauses

Cooperative Traffic TSoS Use Case. Despite the fact that the problem of real-time signal control at the junctions of urban traffic networks has been studied for many decades, and many different urban traffic control strategies have been developed, tested and are operational in a number of cities around the world, it is today a well-accepted fact that urban traffic control systems are not able to cope effectively with the constantly increasing problem of congestion. According to the American FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) “No current generally available tool is adequate for optimizing [signal] timing in congested conditions” (2008). Moreover, the problem of designing effective urban traffic control strategies will become significantly more complicated with the introduction of cooperative traffic/transport systems, whereby vehicles will be enabled to communicate directly with each other and with the infrastructure. Thus, apart from controlling the traffic signals in the junctions, the control system is also called to optimize the routes and speeds of the cooperative vehicles. In general, the existing real-time traffic control strategies can be categorized into centralized strategies, where the junction signals are controlled based on information from the whole traffic network; and local strategies where only the local traffic information is used for controlling the traffic signals at the - respective - local junction. Due to the high complexity of the problem, it is not possible for the centralized strategies to control each and every traffic light on a second-by-second basis (NP-complete problem); for this reason, centralized strategies provide their control decisions on a cycle basis, which practically means that they change their control decisions every 60-150 seconds [PDDKW]. On the other hand, local strategies are able to control the green times on a second-by-second basis but they are unable to incorporate and take into account information from other parts of the network. It has to be emphasized that the second-by-second control of traffic signals leads to significant delay reduction [Sh04, XSLB] at a junction level. In addition, it would be necessary to allow for the efficient cooperation between the junctions and the cooperative vehicles in the near future. An urban traffic network may seem, at first view, to have a steady and constant structure with respect to its subsystems (i.e. the junctions). However, the functional interdependencies between these subsystems are, in realit...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Cooperative Traffic TSoS Use Case

  • Preparatory Contract Negotiations Meetings Where operational requirements permit, the Employer will grant leave without pay to an employee to attend preparatory contract negotiations meetings.

  • Required Procurement Procedures for Obtaining Goods and Services The Grantee shall provide maximum open competition when procuring goods and services related to the grant-assisted project in accordance with Section 287.057, Florida Statutes.

  • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Capability The wind plant shall provide SCADA capability to transmit data and receive instructions from the ISO and/or the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, as applicable, to protect system reliability. The Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected and the wind plant Developer shall determine what SCADA information is essential for the proposed wind plant, taking into account the size of the plant and its characteristics, location, and importance in maintaining generation resource adequacy and transmission system reliability in its area.

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CBB chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CBB’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CBB to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG.

  • Drug and Alcohol Testing – Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Employees required to have a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) are subject to pre-employment, post-accident, random and reasonable suspicion testing in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation rules, Coast Guard Regulations (46 CFR Part 16) or the Federal Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991. The testing will be conducted in accordance with current Employer policy.

  • Red Hat Directory Server Use Cases Subscription Services are provided for Red Hat Directory Server only when used for its supported Use Case in accordance with the terms of this Exhibit and Table 3.1 below.

  • Certification for Federal-Aid Contracts Lobbying Activities A. The CONSULTANT certifies, by signing and submitting this Contract, to the best of its knowledge and belief after diligent inquiry, and other than as disclosed in writing to the LPA prior to or contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Contract by the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT has complied with Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code, and specifically, that:

  • Travelling, Transport and Fares (a) An employee required and authorised to use their own motor vehicle in the course of their duties will be paid not less than the allowance set out in item 21 in Table 2.

  • Reactive Power and Primary Frequency Response 9.6.1 Power Factor Design Criteria

  • Alternate Traffic Routing If CLEC has a LIS arrangement which provides two (2) paths to a CenturyLink End Office Switch (one (1) route via a Tandem Switch and one (1) direct route), CLEC may elect to utilize alternate traffic routing. CLEC traffic will be offered first to the direct trunk group (also referred to as the "primary high" route) and then overflow to the Tandem Switch group (also referred to as the "alternate final" route) for completion to CenturyLink End Office Switches.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.