Correlations (Table 4) Sample Clauses

Correlations (Table 4). When collapsing across the full sample, informant reports were significant, but modest for each scale. Weaker relations emerged for each scale among HCs. Correlations were substantially higher, but largely non-significant given the relatively small sample size, when collapsing across anxiety sub-groups and within each anxiety disorder subtype. Non-parametric Xxxxxxxx Rho analyses largely confirmed findings (see supplementary materials Table S5).

Correlations (Table 4). When collapsing across the full sample, informant reports were highly correlated for each scale (r’s > .50). More modest correlations emerged among HCs and when collapsing across anxiety sub-groups. There was less consistency within each anxiety disorder subtype. There was no relation between informant scores for the Total scale, or among the SAD group for any scale. However, significant agreement emerged for the GAD group on the SA subscale, and the GAD+SAD group on the GA subscale. Non-parametric Xxxxxxxx Rho analyses largely confirmed findings (see supplementary materials Table S5).