Discussion: Verification and Validation Sample Clauses

Discussion: Verification and Validation. ‌ XX advised that verification test cases should be included in the XXXXXX database. A discussion was had on the Method of Manufactured Solutions, which is a way of producing numerical solutions to complex problems not amenable to analytical solutions. As MMS is able to identify coding errors, it was generally agreed that MMS was the responsibility of code developers rather than practitioners. Xxxxx Xxxxxx reflected that the Method of Manufactured Solutions looked very time consuming and even vendors would “run in the opposite direction”. The Xxxxxx consortium needs to reflect this concern in its outputs. SG also pointed out that you have to reflect on the input data that is missing i.e. to be aware of material or boundary or initial condition parameters that are estimated rather than known with certainty. After the presentation on the database by Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, there was a discussion on how to structure the validation database (e.g. categories the experiments). Good categorisation is vital to allow 3rd parties to find what they need. It was noted that data on experimental setup is often limited and sometimes edited out of journal papers. As example, boundary conditions are very important but are often not communicated properly. XX noted that in the US, there was an attempt to build a well-structured and populated validation database (AIAA?) but that this was very difficult and ultimately not successful. While a validation database could be organised by physics, XX advised strongly against organising a verification database by this structure. Instead the database should have a set of data files/cases arranged by: analytical solution, numerical solution etc. The discussion turned to the difference between V&V and calibration. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx advised that if a validation database is available, and it is used by a practitioner for model calibration purposes then it cannot used by the same person as a validation database. In other words, we need to be clear about the difference between model calibration stages and solution validation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Discussion: Verification and Validation

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum.

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • Inspection and Tests 3.8.1 The Procuring entity or its representative shall have the right to inspect and/or to test the goods to confirm their conformity to the Contract specifications. The Procuring entity shall notify the tenderer in writing in a timely manner, of the identity of any representatives retained for these purposes.

  • Application and Operation of Agreement Clause No. Title

  • Inspections and Testing Each Interconnected Entity shall perform routine inspection and testing of its facilities and equipment in accordance with Good Utility Practice as may be necessary to ensure the continued interconnection of the Customer Facility with the Transmission System in a safe and reliable manner. Each Interconnected Entity shall have the right, upon advance written notice, to request reasonable additional testing of an Interconnected Entity’s facilities for good cause, as may be in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • Application and Operation Subject Matter Clause No.

  • Construction and Scope of Agreement The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any party. This Agreement is the only, sole, entire, and complete agreement of the parties relating in any way to the subject matter hereof. No statements, promises, or representations have been made by any party to any other, or relied upon, and no consideration has been offered or promised, other than as may be expressly provided herein. This Assumption of Risk, Release of Claims, Indemnification, and Hold Harmless and Agreement supersedes any earlier written or oral understandings or agreements between the parties. Participant acknowledges that he/she has read this Assumption of Risk, Release of Claims, Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement, understands its meaning and effect, and agrees to be bound by it. Date:

  • Project Monitoring by the State The State may conduct on-site or off-site monitoring reviews of the Project during the term of this Grant Agreement and for up to ninety (90) days after it expires or is otherwise terminated. The Grantee shall extend its full cooperation and give full access to the Project site and to relevant documentation to the State or its authorized designees for the purpose of determining, among other things:

  • PROCEDURE TO CANCEL AGREEMENT BY THE STUDENT ALL requests for cancellation of the housing agreement must be IN WRITING OR REPRODUCIBLE ELECTRONIC FORMAT and submitted to UCF DHRL at the address for official communications shown in this agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.