Disqualification by Court Intervention Sample Clauses

Disqualification by Court Intervention. The Parties understand that their Collaborative Lawyers’ representation is limited to providing services within the Collaborative Process. Thus, while each lawyer is the advisor of his or her client and serves as the client’s representative and negotiator, the Parties mutually acknowledge that both lawyers, and any one in each lawyer’s office or firm, will be disqualified from representing them in a contested court proceeding against the other spouse.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Disqualification by Court Intervention. The Parties understand that the mediator and the Parties’ collaborative lawyers’ representation is limited to providing services within the collaborative law process with regard to the relevant dispute. Thus, while each lawyer is the advisor of his or her client and serves as the client’s representative and negotiator, the Parties mutually acknowledge that both lawyers, and anyone in each lawyer’s office, will be disqualified from representing them in a contested court proceeding against the other Party in any substantively related matter. Nor may the mediator continue to serve as a mediator of the dispute without the mutual consent of all Parties.
Disqualification by Court Intervention. The Parties understand that their collaborative Lawyers’ representation is limited to providing services within the collaborative law process. Thus, while each Lawyer is the advisor of his or her client and serves as the client’s representative and negotiator, the Parties mutually acknowledge that both Lawyers, and anyone in each Lawyer’s office, will be disqualified from representing them in a contested court proceeding against the other Party.
Disqualification by Court Intervention. We commit to settling our case without court intervention. We understand that our attorney’s representation is limited to the Collaborative Divorce process, and that neither of our attorneys, nor other attorneys from the same firm, can ever represent us in court in a proceeding against the other spouse. In the event a court filing is unavoidable prior to settlement, both attorneys will be disqualified from representing either client, except for filing and assenting to uncontested applicable motions, stipulations, petitions, or orders to which both parties agree. Any resort to litigation prior to settlement shall result in the automatic termination of the Collaborative Divorce process on the date that either party or his or her attorney unilaterally seeks court intervention. In the event that the Collaborative Divorce process terminates, all consultants and experts will be disqualified as witnesses, and their work product will be inadmissible as evidence, unless the parties agree otherwise in writing. See also Sections IX, XI, and XII. We acknowledge that, following settlement, our attorneys may represent us as counsel of record for purposes of filing a joint petition for an uncontested, no-fault divorce.
Disqualification by Court Intervention. We understand that both attorneys, including their respective firms, will be disqualified from ever representing either of us against the other in any adversarial or contested court proceeding. We also understand that all Collaborative Team Members that are or were a part of this Collaborative Team will be disqualified as witnesses and their work product will be inadmissible as evidence in any court proceeding unless we agree otherwise in writing.
Disqualification by Court Intervention. We understand that neither of our attorneys, nor other attorneys from the same firm, can ever represent us in court in a proceeding against the other spouse in connection with this matter except as follows: 1. One may file a complaint for divorce on the grounds of irreconcilable difference only, and the other may file an answer and counter-complaint, if necessary, but such counter- complaint, if any, shall only assert the ground of irreconcilable differences. In the event that any other court filing is unavoidable prior to settlement, both attorneys will be disqualified from representing either client, except for filing and assenting to uncontested motions, stipulations, or petitions to which both parties agree. Any resort to litigation prior to settlement shall result in the automatic termination of the collaborative law process on the date that either party or his or her attorney unilaterally seeks court intervention, provided however that the provisions of this Agreement relating to confidentiality and disqualification/withdrawal of counsel shall remain in effect. In the event that the collaborative law process terminates, all consultants and experts will be disqualified as witnesses, and their work product will be inadmissible as evidence, unless the parties agree otherwise in writing. We acknowledge that, following settlement, our attorneys may represent us as counsel of record for purposes of filing a joint petition for an uncontested, no-fault divorce and at an uncontested hearing on our divorce.
Disqualification by Court Intervention. We understand that the attorneys’ representation is limited to the collaborative family law process and that neither attorney can ever represent a party in Court in a proceeding against the other party. In the event a Court filing is unavoidable (other than the filing of a joint Divorce Complaint and other documents which the parties agree are necessary to effectuate their resolution), we understand the attorneys will be disqualified from representing either client. We acknowledge that each of us has signed a separate retainer letter or contract for legal services with our respective attorneys specifically limiting their representation to the collaborative family law process. By signing their separate retainer letters or contracts for legal services, Xxxxxxx agrees that his attorney shall withdraw representation if the collaborative law process is terminated, and Wife agrees that her attorney shall withdraw representation if the collaborative law process is terminated. In the event that the collaborative family law process terminates, all attorneys and consultants will be disqualified as witnesses and their work product will be inadmissible as evidence unless the parties agree otherwise in writing.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Disqualification by Court Intervention

  • Notice of Disqualification Events The Company will notify the Purchasers in writing, prior to the Closing Date of (i) any Disqualification Event relating to any Issuer Covered Person and (ii) any event that would, with the passage of time, reasonably be expected to become a Disqualification Event relating to any Issuer Covered Person, in each case of which it is aware.

  • Eligibility; Disqualification There will at all times be a Trustee hereunder that is a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the United States of America or of any state thereof that is authorized under such laws to exercise corporate trustee power, that is subject to supervision or examination by federal or state authorities and that has a combined capital and surplus of at least $100.0 million as set forth in its most recent published annual report of condition.

  • No Disqualification Events With respect to the Securities to be offered and sold hereunder in reliance on Rule 506 under the Securities Act, none of the Company, any of its predecessors, any affiliated issuer, any director, executive officer, other officer of the Company participating in the offering hereunder, any beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding voting equity securities, calculated on the basis of voting power, nor any promoter (as that term is defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act) connected with the Company in any capacity at the time of sale (each, an “Issuer Covered Person” and, together, “Issuer Covered Persons”) is subject to any of the “Bad Actor” disqualifications described in Rule 506(d)(1)(i) to (viii) under the Securities Act (a “Disqualification Event”), except for a Disqualification Event covered by Rule 506(d)(2) or (d)(3). The Company has exercised reasonable care to determine whether any Issuer Covered Person is subject to a Disqualification Event. The Company has complied, to the extent applicable, with its disclosure obligations under Rule 506(e), and has furnished to the Purchasers a copy of any disclosures provided thereunder.

  • Disqualification; Conflicting Interests If the Trustee has or shall acquire any “conflicting interest” within the meaning of Section 310(b) of the Trust Indenture Act, the Trustee and the Company shall in all respects comply with the provisions of Section 310(b) of the Trust Indenture Act.

  • Certification Regarding Prohibition of Certain Terrorist Organizations (Tex Gov. Code 2270) Certification Regarding Prohibition of Boycotting Israel (Tex. Gov. Code 2271) 5 Certification Regarding Prohibition of Contracts with Certain Foreign-Owned Companies (Tex. Gov. 5 Code 2274) 5 Certification Regarding Prohibition of Discrimination Against Firearm and Ammunition Industries (Tex.

  • Disqualifying Offenses If at any time it is determined that a person has been found guilty of a misdemeanor or felony offense as a result of a trial or has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, regardless of whether adjudication was withheld, within the last six (6) years from the date of the court’s determination for the crimes listed below, or their equivalent in any jurisdiction, the Contractor is required to immediately remove that person from any position with access to State of Florida data or directly performing services under the Contract. The disqualifying offenses are as follows: (a) Computer related crimes; (b) Information technology crimes; (c) Fraudulent practices; (d) False pretenses; (e) Frauds; (f) Credit card crimes; (g) Forgery; (h) Counterfeiting; (i) Violations involving checks or drafts; (j) Misuse of medical or personnel records; and (k) Felony theft.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!