Educator Plans. Developing Educator Plan
Educator Plans. Self-Directed Growth Plan
Educator Plans. Self-Directed Growth Plan A) A Two-year Self-Directed Growth Plan is for those Experienced Administrators who have an overall rating of proficient or exemplary, and after 2013-2014 whose impact on student learning is moderate or high. A formative evaluation report is completed at the end of year 1 and a summative evaluation report at the end of year 2.
Educator Plans. Directed Growth Plan
Educator Plans. Improvement Plan
Educator Plans. General Educator Plans shall be designed to provide Educators with feedback for improvement, professional growth, and leadership; and to ensure Educator effectiveness and overall system accountability. The Plan must be aligned to the standards and indicators and be consistent with district and school goals. The Educator Plan shall include, but is not limited to: • At least one goal related to improvement of practice tied to one or more Performance Standards; • At least one goal for the improvement the learning, growth and achievement of the students under the Educator’s responsibility; • An outline of actions the Educator must take to attain the goals that include specified professional development and learning activities that the Educator will participate in as a means of obtaining the goals, as well as other support that may be suggested by the Evaluator or provided by the school or district. Examples may include but are not limited to coursework, self-study, action research, curriculum development, study groups with peers, and implementing new programs. It is the Educator’s responsibility to attain the goals in the Plan and to participate in any trainings and professional development provided through the state, district, or other providers in accordance with the Educator Plan.
Educator Plans. Types, Durations, and Special Requirements All Educators will be on Educator Plans. Educator Plans shall take effect upon written approval by the Primary Evaluator and will remain in effect until the end of the period defined in the plan or until the plan is changed in accordance with state regulations and the provisions of this Article. The types, durations, and special requirements of Educator Plans are as follows:
Educator Plans. Improvement Plan An Improvement Plan is for those Educators with PTS whose overall rating is unsatisfactory. The parties agree that in order to provide students with the best instruction, it may be necessary from time to time to place an Educator whose practice has been rated as unsatisfactory on an Improvement Plan of 90 school days. If the Evaluator determines that more than 90 school days are needed to achieve the goals in the plan, then the duration of the play may be extended. The duration of the plan should be no more than one school year. In the case of an Educator receiving a rating of unsatisfactory near the close of one school year, the Improvement Plan may include recommended activities that occur during the summer before the next school year begins. The Evaluator must complete a summative evaluation for the Educator at the end of the period determined by the Evaluator for the Plan. An Educator on an Improvement Plan shall be assigned a Supervising Evaluator (see definitions). The Supervising Evaluator is responsible for providing the Educator with guidance and assistance in accessing the resources and professional development outlined in the Improvement Plan. The primary evaluator may be the Supervising Evaluator. The Improvement Plan shall define the problem(s) of practice identified through the observations and evaluation and detail the improvement goals to be met, the activities the Educator must take to improve and the assistance to be provided to the Educator by the district. The Improvement Plan process shall include: Within ten school days of notification to the Educator that the Educator is being placed on an Improvement Plan, the Evaluator shall schedule a meeting with the Educator to discuss the Improvement Plan. The Evaluator will develop the Improvement Plan, which will include the provision of specific assistance to the Educator. The Educator may request that a representative of the Association attend the meeting(s). The Association will be informed that an Educator has been placed on an Improvement Plan. The Improvement Plan shall: Define the improvement goals directly related to the performance standard(s) and/or student learning outcomes that must be improved; Describe the activities and work products the Educator must complete as a means of improving performance; Describe the assistance that the district will make available to the Educator; Articulate the measurable outcomes that will be accepted as evidence of improvement; Det...
Educator Plans. Directed Growth Plan A Directed Growth Plan is for those Educators with PTS whose overall rating is needs improvement. The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as determined by the Evaluator. The Evaluator shall complete a summative evaluation for the Educator at the end of the period determined by the Plan, but at least annually, and in no case later than May 15. For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is at least proficient, the Evaluator will place the Educator on a Self-Directed Growth Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle. For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is not at least proficient, the Evaluator will rate the Educator as unsatisfactory and will place the Educator on an Improvement Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
Educator Plans. Directed Growth Plan The Educator with PTS, whose overall rating is Needs Improvement, must be observed according to the Directed Growth Plan. The plan will include at least two (2) announced observations, one (1) before January 31st and one (1) after January 31st. The Educator shall have in addition at least two (2) unannounced observations, at least one (1) before January 31st and one (1) after January 31st. The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as determined by the Evaluator. The Evaluator shall complete a Summative Evaluation for the Educator at the end of the period determined by the Plan, but at least annually, and in no case later than May 15th. For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall Summative Performance Rating is at least Proficient, the Evaluator will place the Educator on a Self-Directed Growth Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle. For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall summative performance rating is not at least Proficient, the Evaluator will rate the Educator as Unsatisfactory and will place the Educator on an Improvement Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
