Effective Constraints Placed on Future Policy Determinations Sample Clauses

Effective Constraints Placed on Future Policy Determinations. Interested parties should conceptually recast concession agreements as matters of public policy, rather than merely as bilateral contracts between private parties, because the agreements affect the countries’ future welfare policies by constraining, shaping, and determining future policy. Concession agreements formally constrain the choices of future actors in the areas surrounding the original concession agreement. Unlike most enacted laws, which allow an administration, legislature, or populace that disagrees with the policy to revoke it fairly easily, concession agreements must legally remain in force for the length of the agreement, often thirty to fifty years, or else the government must make severance payments to the corporation.128 As a result, concession agreements formally constrain government policy long after the agreements’ original governmental signatory has left office or retired. Thus, the concession agreement essentially leaves the future government with only 125. Id. at 8 box 2. 126. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Review of PPI Projects To Identify Potentially “Pro- Poor” and “Anti-Poor” Provisions ç (May 31-June 2, 2000) (unpublished manuscript), available at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/conference/section1-paper5.pdf. 127. See supra notes 64-6ç and accompanying text. 128. Most agreements contain an arbitration clause or a liquidated damages clause so that if the agreement is breached, the nonbreaching party, generally the company, receives damages. There are, however, two notable exceptions to the binding, binary nature of such agreements. First, some agreements contain buyout clauses whereby the government can gradually buy back the concession. Second, some companies have agreed to allow for renegotiation of contracts. two choices in the area governed by the concession if it cannot renegotiate the agreement; it must either continue with its portion of the agreement— regardless of the changed circumstances or uncalculated costs that may now make the agreement unnecessary, unprofitable, inefficient, or bad distributional policy—or violate the agreement and pay damages. Concession agreements also indirectly dictate future policy options by constraining the choices of actors in the economic sectors surrounding the original concession agreement. Concession agreements may lock in a policy that commands resources so as effectively to preclude the pursuit of alternative policies. For example, although the terms of a toll road concession may not expre...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Effective Constraints Placed on Future Policy Determinations

  • ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CONTRACT CONDITIONS A. Special Contract Conditions revisions: the corresponding subsections of the Special Contract Conditions referenced below are replaced in their entirety with the following:

  • Limitation of Vendor Indemnification and Similar Clauses This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, is prohibited from indemnifying third-parties (pursuant to the Article 3, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution) except as otherwise specifically provided for by law or as ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction. Article 3, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution states that "no debt shall be created by or on behalf of the State … " and the Texas Attorney General has opined that a contractually imposed obligation of indemnity creates a "debt" in the constitutional sense. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. MW-475 (1982). Thus, contract clauses which require TIPS to indemnify Vendor, pay liquidated damages, pay attorney's fees, waive Vendor's liability, or waive any applicable statute of limitations must be deleted or qualified with ''to the extent permitted by the Constitution and Laws of the State of Texas." Does Vendor agree? Yes, I Agree Alternative Dispute Resolution Limitations This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, does not agree to binding arbitration as a remedy to dispute and no such provision shall be permitted in this Agreement with TIPS. Vendor agrees that any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement, except those specifically and expressly waived or negotiated within this Agreement, may be subject to non-binding mediation at the request of either party to be conducted by a mutually agreed upon mediator as prerequisite to the filing of any lawsuit arising out of or related to this Agreement. Mediation shall be held in either Camp or Titus County, Texas. Agreements reached in mediation will be subject to the approval by the Region 8 ESC's Board of Directors, authorized signature of the Parties if approved by the Board of Directors, and, once approved by the Board of Directors and properly signed, shall thereafter be enforceable as provided by the laws of the State of Texas. Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees No Waiver of TIPS Immunity This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Vendor agrees that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign or government immunity; nor constitute or be construed as a waiver of any of the privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department. The failure to enforce, or any delay in the enforcement, of any privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department under this Agreement or under applicable law shall not constitute a waiver of such privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities or be considered as a basis for estoppel. 5 Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees Payment Terms and Funding Out Clause This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Vendor agrees that TIPS and TIPS Members shall not be liable for interest or late-payment fees on past-due balances at a rate higher than permitted by the laws or regulations of the jurisdiction of the TIPS Member. Funding-Out Clause: Vendor agrees to abide by the applicable laws and regulations, including but not limited to Texas Local Government Code § 271.903, or any other statutory or regulatory limitation of the jurisdiction of any TIPS Member, which requires that contracts approved by TIPS or a TIPS Member are subject to the budgeting and appropriation of currently available funds by the entity or its governing body. 2

  • DEFENSE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SUPPLEMENT CONTRACT CLAUSES 252.246-7000 MATERIAL INSPECTION AND RECEIVING REPORT (MAR 2008)

  • Initial Forecasts/Trunking Requirements Because Verizon’s trunking requirements will, at least during an initial period, be dependent on the Customer segments and service segments within Customer segments to whom CSTC decides to market its services, Verizon will be largely dependent on CSTC to provide accurate trunk forecasts for both inbound (from Verizon) and outbound (to Verizon) traffic. Verizon will, as an initial matter, provide the same number of trunks to terminate Reciprocal Compensation Traffic to CSTC as CSTC provides to terminate Reciprocal Compensation Traffic to Verizon. At Verizon’s discretion, when CSTC expressly identifies particular situations that are expected to produce traffic that is substantially skewed in either the inbound or outbound direction, Verizon will provide the number of trunks CSTC suggests; provided, however, that in all cases Verizon’s provision of the forecasted number of trunks to CSTC is conditioned on the following: that such forecast is based on reasonable engineering criteria, there are no capacity constraints, and CSTC’s previous forecasts have proven to be reliable and accurate.

  • Program Requirements Provided At No Charge to the Judicial Council A. The Contractor shall provide the following items during the Program at no charge to the Judicial Council:

  • Withdrawal of Property from Market or Termination of Discussions Potential Investor acknowledges that the Property has been offered for sale subject to withdrawal of the Property from the market at any time or rejection of any offer because of the terms thereof, or for any other reason whatsoever, without notice, as well as the termination of discussions with any party at any time without notice for any reason whatsoever.

  • Incorporation of Prompt Payment Policy Statement into Contracts The provisions of this Exhibit shall apply to all Payments as they become due and owing pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, notwithstanding that NYSERDA may subsequently amend its Prompt Payment Policy by further rulemaking.

  • Exclusion of applications on preliminary points of law Any recourse to any Court for the determination of a preliminary point of law arising in the course of the arbitration proceedings is excluded.

  • AIR FORCE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SUPPLEMENT CONTRACT CLAUSES 5352.201-9101 OMBUDSMAN (APR 2014) Para (c). Ombudsmen names, addresses, phone numbers, fax, and email addresses. 'Xx. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, AFLCMC/AQP, Phone: DSN 000-0000 Comm (000) 000-0000, E- mail: Xxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.0@xx.xx.xxx.' 5352.223-9000 ELIMINATION OF USE OF CLASS I OZONE DEPLETING SUBSTANCES (ODS) (NOV 2012) 5352.223-9001 HEALTH AND SAFETY ON GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS (NOV 2012) 5352.242-9000 CONTRACTOR ACCESS TO AIR FORCE INSTALLATIONS (NOV 2012) Para (b), Any additional requirements to comply with local security procedures '"to be cited in each individual task order"' Para (d). Additional requirements. '"any additional requirements to comply with AFI 31- 101, Volume 1, the Air Force Installation Security Program, and AFI 31-501, Personnel Security Program Management"' 5352.242-9001 COMMON ACCESS CARDS (CAC) FOR CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL-AF SYSTEMS (NOV 2012)

  • Early Construction of Base Case Facilities Developer may request Connecting Transmission Owner to construct, and Connecting Transmission Owner shall construct, subject to a binding cost allocation agreement reached in accordance with Attachment S to the ISO OATT, including Section 25.8.7 thereof, using Reasonable Efforts to accommodate Developer’s In-Service Date, all or any portion of any System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades required for Developer to be interconnected to the New York State Transmission System which are included in the Base Case of the Class Year Study for the Developer, and which also are required to be constructed for another Developer, but where such construction is not scheduled to be completed in time to achieve Developer’s In-Service Date.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.