Efficiency of TP-AMP Sample Clauses

Efficiency of TP-AMP. We may consider the number of expensive operations, for example, multiple precision multiplications (MPM) in Zp∗, in order to analyze the performance of TP-AMP. We approximate the number of multiplications on average, by assum- ing the use of a left-to-right binary exponentiation method or a simultaneous exponentiation method (denoted by sim) [27]. A slight computational difference between squaring and multiplication can be ignored for convenience. − Let κj = κjj = κjjj = κ for secure prime p while κj = κjj = κjjj = A 2/3 for safe prime p for simple analysis. Practically we can set κjj = 2κ with intentionally R R smaller exponents, for example, x ← {0, 1}κrr and not ← Z∗q for safe prime − − p though it is not general for security argument. For the client, γ may take 1.5(A κj) while m may need 1.5κjj + 1 MPM. For the server, β may take 1.5(κ + κjj) + 2 or 2κjj + 1(sim) MPM. Finally the client may need 1.5κjjj for α. As a result, the client may need 1.5(A κj + κjj + κjjj) + 1 while the server may require 1.5(κ + 2κjj) + 2 MPM totally. Also if we assume an ideal cipher for γ as like EKE2 and AuthA [3, 4], the client may need 1.5(κjj + κjjj) MPM only. One can easily see that the TP-AMP protocol is efficient especially when we use a secure prime, p, since κj = κjj = κjjj = κ. TP-AMP is comparable to the most closely related protocol PAK-Z (with an efficient instance Y using Xxxxxxx’x signature [30]) [25, 26] and AuthA [4, 8] in terms of efficiency. In general, TP-AMP is more efficient than those related schemes under the same assumption, for example, on a safe or secure prime with group size exponents, or an ideal cipher. However, when we use a safe prime with intentionally smaller exponents, PAK-Y shows better in the client, while TP-AMP does still better in the server. Though TP-AMP is not a direct instance of PAK-Z, we can say it provides efficiency on the framework of PAK in the augmented model. As we mentioned already, TP-AMP can be instantiated on EKE2 [3, 4, 8] and provide efficiency on that framework. Thus, we would like to address that TP-AMP is a practical password authenticated key agreement protocol with sufficient security and generic features in the augmented model.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Efficiency of TP-AMP

  • Frequency of Evaluation Short form employees shall be evaluated one (1) time per year, which evaluation shall be completed no later than June 1.

  • Frequency of Evaluations 36.2.1 Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary and trial service periods and annually thereafter. If the supervisor identifies a performance concern during the evaluation period, the supervisor may provide feedback. The supervisor will provide written documentation to the employee with a copy kept in the supervisor’s working file.

  • Sufficiency of Funds Buyer has sufficient cash on hand or other sources of immediately available funds to enable it to make payment of the Purchase Price and consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Energy Efficiency The contractor shall comply with all mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub.L. 94-163) for the State in which the work under this contract is performed.

  • Agency of Human Services The Agency of Human Services is responsible for overseeing all contracts and grants entered by any of its departments, boards, offices and business units, however denominated. The Agency of Human Services, through the business office of the Office of the Secretary, and through its Field Services Directors, will share with any named AHS-associated party to this Agreement oversight, monitoring and enforcement responsibilities. Party agrees to cooperate with both the named AHS-associated party to this contract and with the Agency of Human Services itself with respect to the resolution of any issues relating to the performance and interpretation of this Agreement, payment matters and legal compliance.

  • Surplus; Shortage and Deficiency of Funds In accordance with RESPA, if there is a surplus of Funds held in escrow, Xxxxxx will account to Borrower for such surplus. If Xxxxxxxx’s Periodic Payment is delinquent by more than 30 days, Xxxxxx may retain the surplus in the escrow account for the payment of the Escrow Items. If there is a shortage or deficiency of Funds held in escrow, Lender will notify Borrower and Borrower will pay to Lender the amount necessary to make up the shortage or deficiency in accordance with RESPA. Upon payment in full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument, Xxxxxx will promptly refund to Borrower any Funds held by Xxxxxx.

  • Insufficiency of Net Proceeds If the Net Proceeds are insufficient to pay in full the cost of any repair, restoration, modification or improvement referred to in Section 8.01, Lessee shall either (a) complete such replacement, repair, restoration, modification or improvement and pay any costs thereof in excess of the amount of the Net Proceeds, or (b) pay or cause to be paid to Lessor the amount of the then applicable Termination Value for the Equipment, and, upon such payment, the Lease Term shall terminate and Lessor’s security interest in the Equipment shall terminate as provided in Section 6.01 hereof. The amount of the Net Proceeds, if any, remaining after completing such repair, restoration, modification or improvement or after purchasing such Equipment shall be retained by Lessee. If Lessee shall make any payments pursuant to this Section, Lessee shall not be entitled to any reimbursement therefor from Lessor nor shall Lessee be entitled to any diminution of the amounts payable under Article IV.

  • Equipment Procurement If responsibility for construction of the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades is to be borne by the Connecting Transmission Owner, then the Connecting Transmission Owner shall commence design of the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades and procure necessary equipment as soon as practicable after all of the following conditions are satisfied, unless the Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner otherwise agree in writing:

  • Maintenance & Repairs 5.1 Lessee shall at all times be responsible for maintaining at its own expense the leased premises in a clean, orderly and safety condition, except as hereinafter provided. Lessee shall be responsible, at its own expense, to clean and maintain all trade fixtures, machinery and equipment furnished by Lessee within the leased premises. Lessee shall be responsible to deposit normal office waste and rubbish at a location at the Central School as designated by Lessor.

  • Required Coverages For Generation Resources Of 20 Megawatts Or Less Each Constructing Entity shall maintain the types of insurance as described in section 11.1 paragraphs (a) through (e) above in an amount sufficient to insure against all reasonably foreseeable direct liabilities given the size and nature of the generating equipment being interconnected, the interconnection itself, and the characteristics of the system to which the interconnection is made. Additional insurance may be required by the Interconnection Customer, as a function of owning and operating a Generating Facility. All insurance shall be procured from insurance companies rated “A-,” VII or better by AM Best and authorized to do business in a state or states in which the Interconnection Facilities are located. Failure to maintain required insurance shall be a Breach of the Interconnection Construction Service Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.