Common use of Employee's Response Clause in Contracts

Employee's Response. An employee's opportunity to respond to the appointing authority is not intended to be an evidentiary hearing. An employee has the right to have a representative of his/her own choosing at the meeting. The employee need not be accorded the opportunity to cross-examine a departments’ witnesses. However, the limited nature of this response does not obviate the appointing authority's responsibility to initiate further investigation if the employee's version of the facts raises doubts as to the accuracy of the department director's information leading to the discipline proposal . An employee may elect not to respond, thereby waiving any further predisciplinary response. The appointing authority will evaluate the proposed discipline in light of the employees response, if any. Within five (5) business days of the employee's response, or other deadline for response established by the parties, the decision of the appointing authority will be transmitted in writing to the employee. Service of the decision will be in person or by registered mail.

Employee's Response. An employee's opportunity to respond to the appointing authority is not intended to be an evidentiary hearingadversarial in nature. An employee has the right to have a representative of his/his or her own choosing at the meeting. The employee need not be accorded the opportunity to cross-examine a departments’ department's witnesses, nor to present a formal case in opposition to the proposed discipline. However, the limited nature of this response does not obviate the appointing authority's responsibility to initiate further investigation if the employee's version of the facts raises doubts as to the accuracy of the department director's information leading to the discipline proposal proposal. An employee may elect not to respond, thereby waiving any further predisciplinary response. The appointing authority will evaluate the proposed discipline in light of the employees employee's response, if any. Within five (5) business working days of the employee's response, or other deadline for response established by the partiesresponse, the a decision of the appointing authority will be transmitted in writing to the employee. Service of the decision will be in person or by registered mail.

Employee's Response. An employee's opportunity to respond to the appointing authority is not intended to be an evidentiary adversarial hearing. An employee has the right to have a representative of his/her own choosing at the meeting. The employee need not be accorded the opportunity to cross-examine a departments’ witnesses, nor to present a formal case in opposition to the proposed discipline. However, the limited nature of this response does not obviate the appointing authority's responsibility to initiate further investigation if the employee's version of the facts raises doubts as to the accuracy of the department directorhead's information leading to the discipline proposal proposal. An employee may elect not to respond, thereby waiving any further predisciplinary response. The appointing authority will evaluate the proposed discipline in light of the employees employee’s response, if any. Within five (5) business working days of the employee's response, or other deadline for response established by the parties, the decision of the appointing authority will be transmitted in writing to the employee. Service of the decision will be in person or by registered mail.

Employee's Response. An employee's opportunity to respond to the appointing authority is not intended to be an evidentiary adversarial hearing. An employee has the right to have a representative of his/her own choosing at the meeting. The employee need not be accorded the opportunity to cross-examine a departments’ witnesses, nor to present a formal case in opposition to the proposed discipline. However, the limited nature of this response does not obviate the appointing authority's responsibility to initiate further investigation if the employee's version of the facts raises doubts as to the accuracy of the department directorChief of Police's information leading to the discipline proposal proposal. An employee may elect not to respond, thereby waiving any further predisciplinary response. The appointing authority will evaluate the proposed discipline in light of the employees employee’s response, if any. Within five (5) business working days of the employee's response, or other deadline for response established by the parties, the decision of the appointing authority will be transmitted in writing to the employee. Service of the decision will be in person or by registered mail.

Employee's Response. An employee's opportunity to respond to the appointing authority is not intended to be an evidentiary adversarial hearing. An employee has the right to have a representative of his/her own choosing at the meeting. The employee need not be accorded the opportunity to cross-examine a departments’ witnesses, nor to present a formal case in opposition to the proposed discipline. However, the limited nature of this response does not obviate the appointing authority's responsibility to initiate further investigation if the employee's version of the facts raises doubts as to the accuracy of the department directorhead's information leading to the discipline proposal proposal. An employee may elect not to respond, thereby waiving any further predisciplinary response. The appointing authority Chief of Police will evaluate the proposed discipline in light of the employees employee’s response, if any. Within five (5) business working days of the employee's response, or other deadline for response established by the parties, the decision of the appointing authority will be transmitted in writing to the employee. Service of the decision will be in person or by registered mail.